47 Grand, 0-60 in 4.6: MT Tests Mustang GT PP

[ccap41]

DAAAAYYYYYUUUUMMMM

SH** gettin' reeeaaal.

Just joshin' around fellas.

[Guest Wings4Life(BANNED)]

OK, fair enough, even though clearly asked you to ask it in reference to the context of why they are asking it.

 

So the answer is, yes, I have sat in a Camaro.  

Where you ask?

 

Woodward Dream Cruise in August at the Chevy display. They had many models there including a convertible with the top down. 

And no, of course I did not drive one.

 

Now, kindly answer me as to why that question is asked.

 

Waiting,.......

 

 

Surreal,

I eagerly await your reply to my question. 

 

Thanks.

[El Kabong]

"My only point here, that you can't seem to argue against, is that MT stated Mustang was the better all around car. Now, if you want to debate that, I am all about that."

It cannot be the better overall car. IT LOST THE COMPARO. BADLY.

Easiest debate ever :D

Edited October 31, 2015 by El Kabong

[Drew Dowdell]

 

 

 

Shame that GM missed the refinement boat.  Only disadvantage Mustang has to overcome next year, is more power and gears.

 

You've driven the 2016 Camaro extensively then?  Can you do a write up on it?

 

I'm curious what parts you feel need more refining on a chassis derived from a Cadillac. 

 

*hands Wings a bottle of aleo vera*

 

Here's some aleo for that BURN!!! (It helps heal burns, or skin damage in general - DOUBLE BURN FOR PRETENDING YOU DONT KNOW THE BENEFITS OF ALOE VERA ON THE SKIN!!!)

 

 

 

Sorry cap, I proved drew wrong ::::as I hand over an un-opened bottle of aloe, with a grin::::::

 

 

 

You did no such thing.  I asked for your experience with the Camaro, not a parrot of someone else's opinion. I have little faith in the majority of the motor press for any opinions... that's why I own my own site. 

[Guest Wings4Life(BANNED)]

Oh, and the Mustang also has a weight disadvantage going forward.... much harder to make up for than gear ratios or power deficiencies. 

 

 

The Mustang is a bigger car yet only weighs as little as 30 lbs more in base V8 trim.

 

Hardly a disadvantage.  

[Guest Wings4Life(BANNED)]

 

 

 

 

Shame that GM missed the refinement boat.  Only disadvantage Mustang has to overcome next year, is more power and gears.

 

You've driven the 2016 Camaro extensively then?  Can you do a write up on it?

 

I'm curious what parts you feel need more refining on a chassis derived from a Cadillac. 

 

*hands Wings a bottle of aleo vera*

 

Here's some aleo for that BURN!!! (It helps heal burns, or skin damage in general - DOUBLE BURN FOR PRETENDING YOU DONT KNOW THE BENEFITS OF ALOE VERA ON THE SKIN!!!)

 

 

 

Sorry cap, I proved drew wrong ::::as I hand over an un-opened bottle of aloe, with a grin::::::

 

 

 

You did no such thing.  I asked for your experience with the Camaro, not a parrot of someone else's opinion. I have little faith in the majority of the motor press for any opinions... that's why I own my own site. 

 

 

 

MT did the comparison, and I was clearly echoing their opinion.

 

And you clearly asked it as if they had not ever been compared.

[Drew Dowdell]

OK, fair enough, even though clearly asked you to ask it in reference to the context of why they are asking it.

 

So the answer is, yes, I have sat in a Camaro.  

Where you ask?

 

Woodward Dream Cruise in August at the Chevy display. They had many models there including a convertible with the top down. 

And no, of course I did not drive one.

 

Now, kindly answer me as to why that question is asked.

 

Waiting,.......

 

You sat in a very early pre-production model. 

[Drew Dowdell]

Wings, your takeaway from the MT comparison is that the Mustang makes a better Accord than the Camaro does?...... okay. 

[El Kabong]

Wings, your takeaway from the MT comparison is that the Mustang makes a better Accord than the Camaro does?...... okay.

I was going to say "Camry" but yeah, Accord works too.

[Drew Dowdell]

This thread has gone on long enough.