Automotive News, Reviews, and Discussion

I think that is with Employee pricing and not including the $1695 destination charge. $29,840 + $1695 destination is the new price without the employee pricing.

I read that and it's really too bad. Some of them have great goofy personalities that shine through. The only cat we had when I was a kid was a black female and she had a great personality.

The Ranger Raptor has a timing belt that is problematic, that is a no go for me. The motor in my Ranger has a timing chain. I really want 400 plus miles of Range, would like more in my Ranger to be honest.

Saw this at around noontime. It's not the very last-gen MC, hence 2005 and before. It's not my color, but it's in incredible condition ... This would have the 3400 V6 instead of the final 3500 VVT. I was always sort of "meh" on the Chevy high-value 60 degree V6, but they have been long lasting workhorses for so many. And, on the highway, they'd return 33 or 34 mpg on rented MCs and Impalas. Now put that in your pipe and smoke it!

F150 owners don't as much either. Maverick owners very likely are buying because of efficiency. I'm sure they didn't exactly want a teens city number for fuel economy. Raptors also probably have 28-36 gallon tanks. My MKC with it's little 15.1 gallon tank couldn't get 300 miles out of a tank unless you were driving all highway and also drove it to E. Sub-300 mile tanks is pretty annoying, to be honest. I know these Mavericks have 16.5 gallon tanks, so that is a pretty good improvement, and a 2.3 would still yield over 300 miles now...most likely.