Jump to content
Create New...

Sixty8panther

Members
  • Posts

    15,916
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Sixty8panther

  1. If I was you I'd go with Katie... but I'm not and for all I know Jn could be really nice. I hate materialistic, shallow girls and even a twinge of that would turn me away form Jen. Just my $0.02
  2. I love the fender scallops, it's the FWD, transverse mounted engine & bland front end that I don't like.
  3. You get waht you pay for. Given the choice betwen a semi-safe car adn NO car most people in the market for a Dacia will go with a cheap new car versus walking.
  4. Still $3.09 around here but I'm hoping we se $1.99 soon.
  5. That double dash is so retarded. What a dum idea. I'd rather have a '78 Pacer.
  6. I love the 1:18 scale cars. Just picked up a 1969 Camaro SS396 in yellow on eBay. It was only $12 + 6 shipping. No box. I already have the exact same model but screw it now I have two yellow '69 SS396. Couldn't resist. I payed $30 for my first one. I've already got like 12 1:18 scale '69s. My favorite is the LeMans blue Yenko.
  7. Don't get us CzechoSloakians involved.... me or GT1750 might get offended. FYI: here's what a Slovakian kit car looks like: Beyond the mid engine setup and killer loks this thing offers ample trunk space. :) http://www.k1-styling.sk/menu.php
  8. Yeah, what they said. Not like this thign will be doign a lot of off-roading anyway. :rolleyes:
  9. Pontiac fanatic, Fiero obsessed & criminaly insane.
  10. I've seen at leatst a few '68 Z/28 RS Camaros at the shows over the years. A few thousand Z/28s were made in 1968, I'm sure there's more than a few RS copies. http://www.classiccarmall.com/carsfs/sale2135.htm
  11. You beat me to it Ocnblu. It was -IE not -Y. And yes, a Galaxie minivan by any spelloing sucks! :angry:
  12. Someone slap some wood paneling on this sucka!
  13. It's a functional Flying Butress. Yes it's necessary.
  14. WTF is up wiht all the neon highlighting? I've gone blind from it.
  15. Yeah, I'm a open minded guy and in the same boat. Because of my consrvative upbringing I used to be a little homophobic. Then in College I made a few gay friends and realised there;s nothing to be "afraid" of. My G/F Marcia has a lot of gay frineds so when we strted dating she dragged me to a couple gay clubs a few times. I would cling to her because if I didn't have her around I'd get hit on. There's this one weirdo nicknamed "Mr.Bean" who frequents all the gay clubs. He's the spitting image of Rowan Atkins and has similar but more atypical manerism. Even this guy was trying to schmooze wiht me. :P One time we're waiting to get in by the door and I grab a Mint out of the complementary dish while standing in line. The very efeminite and semi-creepy guy at the door (club-manager?) says in a dirty old man voice wiht a stereotypical lisp: "Have a candy little boy." That was a little weird. Marcia told me he was just goofing wiht me but either way it was a bit strange coming form a guy twice my age. I was early 20s he was like 52. BTW: Thank god for Lesbian Porn. It's almost better than Camaros. Almost. http://www.cheersandgears.com/public/style_emoticons//AH-HA_wink.gif
  16. Some more Corvair eye candy. http://www.tocmp.com/brochures/Chev/1960/C...vair66d_jpg.jpg
  17. After the boy scout outing I bet Mom & Dad made a wet spot on the rear seat. :booyah:
  18. Good question. I'm known for being a HUGE fan of RWD and I hate most FWD cars. I also dislike Automatics but I can forgive that more easily than FWD. Look at it this way. A 1982 Camaro Iron Duke (4-cylinder) is as slow as piss but at least it's RWD. It may be as slow as a 3-cylinder Metro in 100% stock form but at least you start off wiht potential. I can take an old tired Camaro like this and drop in a nice healthy 350 and be running 13s at the track all days long, or perhaps an LS1?, LS6?, or how about the 502 big blockl crate? Screw it might as well shove in the 9.4 liter 572. See what I mean? all it takes to make an old school rwd car great is a better engine and trans. But on the other hand a FWD 1992 Civic will always be lame even after you spend $20,000 on ground effects, rims, turbos, NOS & paint. To conert a fast car wiht a transverse mounted engine ad FWD to RWD is posible but a huge waste of money in most cases. RWD = performance & proper handeling. Except for a few exceptions I consider FWD to be lame, impractical, annoying and a waste of torque. Most true car enthusiasts agree. Hope that answers things for you. :)
  19. I'm just saying it looks unique. I love designs that stand out and yet blend in at the same time. The Olds Achieva ended up wiht a few styling cues from this car. looks a million times better than the Camry or Maxima from this era. The Accord was still a decent looking car but this was more original.
  20. And due to my recent trip to No. Carolina I was not even around to post whore and help out. :P
  21. Pretty uninspired, I like the Tunda grille but it's a bit "grafted on". Although it's kind of ugly and not very cohesive it still looks better than the 1st & 2nd generations. The Rav4 has always been an ugly stepchild to the Corolla IMO.
  22. Yummy! :D
  23. Funny you should say that. You know who owns Daihatsu, right? BTW: I think it's ugly.
  24. Yup... it's like all my life I thouhgt I was an obsessed freak and no on understood my rants bout Harley Earl, Bill Mitchell, Delorean and all those magical cars they had a part in. When I found C&G (through the Camaro Design Contest) I finaly felt I had found a bnunch of freaks as chemically inbalanced as I am. :P
  25. This aborted Wrangler Fetus must have been beaten with the ugly stick. It makes me want to hurl. The only thing worse than the styling is the horrific paint. * That's coming from someone who LIKES Gm's 60s & 70s puke greens.
×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search