Carguy

Lust think of what a Lucerne Coupe/Wagon would look like! To bad its FWD because THAT would LOOK GOOD! And the G body is NOT out dated YET! Its still a VERY stiff and GOOD platform I just wish it were RWD!

Put them up razermister!-- :P --Put them up NOW!!

HOUSEWIFES MENTALITY??----Its a HOUSEWIFE who would see that PUNY LITTLE V8 and think its CUTE!! Till she DROVE IT THAT IS!! You would need to DRIVE IT LOKE YOU HATE IT meanwhile the LEXUS IS350 would BLOW ITS DOORS OFF!! ((A 3 Liter 7000RPM V8 Wildcat?))----PAAALEEEEEEASE! That would DEGRADE BUICK'S BRAND! Its fine to like ITALIAN sports cars and their tiny HIGHSTRUNG Engines but that fits that market.----((NOT BUICKS!!))----And the WARE and TEAR would be TERRABLE!! Do you REALIZE the amount of fuel that little V8 would use at 7000RPM that it could ONLY REACH with a HORRABLY LOW AXEL RATIO? GAS--HOG---CITY!

FWD,MAN HATERS,FWD,CHILD MOLESTERS,FWD,People who call themselfs LIBERALS but are ACTUALLY COMMIES,FWD,AMERICA HATERS,FWD,FLAG BURNERS and did I say (((FWD!!)))

CAMARO!--------CAMARO!--------WERE ARE THEE??---I miss the scent of thy TIRE SMOKE!---The curve of thy finders!---The HUMM of thy Engine!---OH dear CAMARO were have thee gone? :( Are thee to be reborn in thy former image?---To return to us as before?---Or will ye break our hearts once more? :( :huh:

Make a COUPE version of the next CTS and restyle it for Pontiac as a 35K 450HP SB V8 powered GTO! Then do a 550HP 45K JUDGE version of it also both with styling like the late 1960's versions but MORE DRAMATIC and MEANER LOOKING!!

So you would want say a future Malibu to have a REDLINE up around 8K RPM with its 3.5L 4VPC DOHC 90 degree V8? To get that kind of POWER for normal driveing it would need a VERY LOW axel ratio like 5.00 to 1 witch KILL FUEL ECONOMY! They would be better off with a OHV 4.5L 2VPC DOD 90 degree V8 tuned like the LS2 with 300HP and 310FT/LB of Torque and a HIGHER axel ratio like 3.00 to 1. But then people would JOKE about GM's V8 getting NO MORE HORSEPOWER then COMPETITERS 3.5L V6's! DONT get me WRONG I would LOVE a V8 in something like the Bu but (V8) has a premium image to it and SHOULD NOT be compairable to V6's when it comes to POWER.

At LEAST its NOT a (BIG) 1/18th scale!--- :o ---THAT would TRUELY be (HORRABLE!) :P As small as it is and with a VERY STEADY paint brush hand that (?COULD?) be OK. :)

A three liter V8 tuned like the NS V8 would put out around 225HP and 220FT/LB of Torque at a like RPM! If thats what you want for GM then you MUST desire their DEATH! :angry: <_< You have made TO MANY good posts in the past to ACTUALLY think THAT Razer! Think about what it is you are saying!! A three and a half liter V8 would put out 255HP and 250HP!----And YAH THATS WEAK compaired to the 3.5L ((V6's)) in the compatition. EMASCULATE GM??----I DONT THINK SO!! <_<

A weak small V8 to compete with V6's is a ((BAD IDEA!!))---And Member55's point allong with mine are GOOD! How do these points NOT FIT IN THIS FORUM?? <_<

#66!----Because its ((TRUE!!))----REAL MEN UNITE/REVOLT!!----NO MORE GIRLYMEN!!----MORE GIRLYWOMEN!!

AHHHHHHHHHH-----BUICK!!-----WHAT A HISTORY!-----GM-----PAY ATTENTION!

HAY-------I--------I KNOW THAT GUY!--------HAY!

(((A FREAKIN MEN MAN A FREAKIN MEN!!))) B)

please----((PLEASE!!))----NO SMALL 3.5L or 215CI WEAK V8's!! That would be a HORRABLE IDEA to have a V8 thats NO BETTER then competiters V6's!! I agree with Member55 and have said like things before about useing a SB V8 in the REGULAR CTS. With the PROPER GEARING and DOD a OHV SB V8 powered CTS could get BETTER FUEL ECONOMY then a LOWER GEARED HIGHER REVVING LESS TORQUEY 3.6L DOHC V6 does! Why not KILL the competiters over just competing with them? Let CADDY be a ALL V8 brand AGAIN!!

This must be JOKE!!-------Lexus (((BS??)))--------Come ON!---------Can they REALLY BE THAT STUPID??? :huh:-------(BS?)-------I think BS is BS!!-------They should call it the AS!--- :o ---Yah and a SPORT version could be called (ASS!)--- :blink: ---(NO?)-------WHATEVER!! <_<

Anyone got $25K I can use to buy a SOLSTICE?------I will pay you BACK!------Somehow!------Someway!------Someday! :P

Good thinking! B)

I thought the ALTRA V8's were canceled! :huh:

As long as they keep the weight down bellow todays SIGMA with this SIGMA/ZETA/VE hybrid platform. And offer a Coupe-Base 3.9L 250HP V6--Z28 5.3L 325HP V8--SS 400HP 6.0L -CAMARO! And a Sadan-3.9L 250HP V6--4.8L 300HP V8-CHEVELLE with the PROPER Cami 69/Chev 70 STYLING I will be HAPPY!! :)

This BASTARD has commited AUTOSIDE!!---MOTORMURDER!!---A CADDYKILLING!!------He is nothing more than a.------((EVIL SCUM SUCKING SLIMEBALL who should be forced to RIDE nothing more then a BICYCLE for the REST OF HIS LIFE!!)) :angry: He probibly drives a CAMCORD! And reads CONSUMER REPORTS!! <_< :angry:

HUMOR! :AH-HA_wink: I have a WEARD form of humor!----Marry Christmas to you to. :)

The last of those cars useing Lambo V12's were built here in my home town of Jacksonville Fl.-----((BRAG--BRAG!!)) :P I allwase liked old Jerry Weigert he reminded me of Prestin Tucker a little with his dream of THE AMERICAN SUPERCAR! To bad its NOT POSSABLE for a lone single and creative MAN to find his DREAM AUTOMOBILE COMPANY these days! <_< Its Henry Fords America NO more!! <_<

I dont see many other uses for this Engine line due to its TALL SIZE. And it WAS a waist of $$$ that could have been used BETTER for other things with in GM!-------PS. They could have used the 2.2L then later the 2.4L I4 as the base Colorado/Canyon Engine instead of the $$EXPENSIVE$$ ALL NEW ATLAS LINE! <_< The ..whole idea of this "topic" was to OPINE!----So thats what I did! :angry:

The most used and best of the Atlas line is OBVEIOUSLY the STRONG I6! But I still see NO NEED for these Engines when GM could have saved $$$ by useing the 6.0L V8 block in the same way they did the Older 350/5.7L-to-262/4.3L one to make a new 4.5L V6. Based on a LS6 6.0L V8 it would be a 310HP 4.5L V6 that they could use in the Trailblazer/Colorado ect. Based on lesser 6.0L truck V8's like the 345HP one it would put out 255HP for a base Engine in the big trucks. GM needs to use their $$$ more wisely then they have been in the past with the Atlas line.---Is it good?---YES!---Was an EXPENSIVE completely new Engine line really needed that badly?---((NO!!))