Jump to content
Create New...

Drew Dowdell

Editor-in-Chief
  • Posts

    55,281
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    481

Everything posted by Drew Dowdell

  1. But then certain Mercedes lovers would harp on Cadillac for not selling at the volumes they sell now. I never will understand why people set different standards for Cadillac than they set for Mercedes.
  2. I don't own it yet, but this is what I've decided on if I can ever stop having big bills biting me in the ass and Trump stops tanking the stock market. (That's not a political statement, his actions have a direct effect on the stock market in the past two months, all bad ones)
  3. I would love one. The downside is the gas mileage is sooooo terrible it makes long trips in them prohibitive. It's not like the Avalanche is great, but 21-22mph highway is easier to stomach than 17-18. I really wish Cadillac had kept building them with the new 6.2.
  4. That can be the other car. I'm not riding the motorcycle from Pittsburgh to Florida. That's why I want the mototote. Take it with me to my parents'.
  5. I've got an apathy softy for it. I think GM messed up on the Acadia in styling and interior. They saddled it with the weaksauce 2.5 liter 4-cylinder which I'm sure is only sold to rental fleets. The put a lame base AWD system in it and charge a bunch more for the slick twin-clutch AWD that the XT5 and Lacrosse get. Most trims come with the 6-speed auto instead of the 9-speed (From memory, only the All-Terrain can some with the 9-speed, but I could be wrong) It drives dull, it does nothing special, it gives you no reason to buy it over the competition. It is the epitome of mediocre. I would pick virtually any other vehicle in the class, including the Edge and any of the imports, over the Acadia. I'd even pick the Traverse or Enclave over the Acadia as both are substantially better looking, both come with the 9-speed, and neither get the lame 2.5 liter. It the most forgettable in the sea of forgettable crossovers out there. Yet GM sells about 12k of them a month..... so what do I know. The fact remains that it is only about $1500 more than the Edge and Ford sells about 12k Edges a month. With or without that third row... they compete with each other. Ford has an advantage here in that they also have the best selling Explorer in the same showroom, GMC no longer has direct competition to the Explorer, and the Explorer is about to get a heck of a lot better than it already is.
  6. It would be out of the frying pan into the fire if we moved to a crewcab Taco or Canyonado from the Encore. The Encore does the trip, but it is really snug. Whatever we buy next will have more cabin space. What I really want is some larger long distance cruiser for those trips and something smaller sportier when it is just the two of us or just me. There is a wall there that can drop down ala Avalanche style. But it has a 6,200 lbs towing capacity... so I can use a Mototote.
  7. Every time these come up it makes me want to go find a barely used Bravada, 9-7x, or Rainier. They still are good looking SUVs.
  8. I get that you've had a hate boner for the Acadia since it was released, but really, it is GM's most direct competitor to the Edge. You wouldn't consider the Rogue to be a different segment from the Equinox just because it has a 3rd row. They sell at the nearly the same price and at nearly the same numbers.
  9. It's a luxury item that is hard to live without once you've had it a while. In @Paolino's case, he had it on his old Lacrosse and I believe his parent's Lucerne and is wondering why it isn't on the new one. The easiest way to apply Rainex is to buy the rainex washer fluid and use as normal.
  10. ATS 2.0T RWD - 3,373 lbs ATS 3.6 RWD - 3,461 lbs So 88lbs with that change alone.
  11. Once a month or every other month. We do trips from Pittsburgh to DC to my partner's sisters and his parents no longer do long distance drives.
  12. In the case of the F150, there are still all of the turbo equipment to account for. Most F150s are already sold in Ecoboost form... go going from 2.7EB to 2.3EB is really just dropping one turbo. I have a meeting, but I'll see if I can find an example of what you're looking for. I'm thinking ATS 2.0T v. V6 or Camaro 2.0T v V6 will likely be the examples used.
  13. Yes it would be additional development costs of course... but just like we now have 25 "different" sizes of crossover in a single brand that are mere inches apart in size, I think it would sell. Imagine another Ford truck, the F-100 say, that is 5% smaller than the F150 but has a more light duty build that cuts 10% - 15% of the weight out. If the truck maxes out at 5k or 6k towing capactiy, they can build components lighter. The F150 right now ranges from 5,500 lbs to 12,000 lbs towing, but even on the 5,500 lbs configuration, there is no difference in major components like drive shaft, differential, frame, axle, suspension... etc. So the 5,500 lbs capable truck lugs around a lot of extra weight that it will never be able to utilize. If Ford could swap out a bunch of those components for lighter duty parts, they could save a significant amount of weight, and weight is the biggest killer of fuel economy. The truck could probably be powered by the 2.3 liter 4-cylinder as a base engine and save additional weight over a V6. Once you don't have to engineer the platform to handle such high weights, it cascades a lot of vehicle mass away. Cutting 15% of the weight out of a SuperCrew 4x4 2.7 Ecoboost drops the weight 720 lbs from 4805 to 4085. That would be huge. Even a 10% drop would be 480 lbs. The Ranger is the quick and dirty answer to the problem, however, it doesn't address the needs of passenger space or bed volume that get people into an F-150 in the first place. The Crewcab is not suitable for putting my inlaws in for 5 hour drives.
  14. A Grand Cherokee EXT would be the bomb! Give it a 6,000 lb tow rating and it would be perfect.
  15. Weight, yes, but also capabilities. I'm not against increasing the capabilities of the 150/1500 series trucks, however there is no lower alternative for those who do not need such capacity... the mall runners... etc. A trimmer F150 / Sierra 1000 would be fine for a lot of these McMansion garage queen trucks. Heck, still load them up with the Lincoln level goodies, but they don't need the frame capacity to tow 10,000 lbs. The mid-size trucks are still too small for those who purchase the full sizers. I'm exactly in that demographic. I want a truck capable of putting a motorcycle in the back, but I don't need huge towing capacity. At the same time, I need a real back seat that can be used for long distance travel, the Colorado/Ranger/Taco can't really offer that. The F150 is overkill.
  16. Any further personal attacks will result in warning points being handed out.
  17. Originally, yes it was only on the GLI. They did bring it back to the entire lineup. I don't know when, but I just checked the site and all the '17s have IRS.
  18. Acadia is only an optional 3-row. In terms of overall bulk, they feel pretty darn close. Most of that 5.5 inches lost would be in the cargo area, so to the passengers, they'll feel largely the same. Edge, Grand Cherokee, Acadia, Murano, all sit roughly in the same space.
  19. Titles in general don't impress me... this one though.... If I accept....
  20. It will be a combination of the first two.
  21. Rain sensing wipers aren't about the on-off, though that's nice. Rain sense is that the car automatically adjusts the wipe interval while driving depending on the intensity of the rain.
  22. CAFE is largely what has moved people into crossovers and trucks. If CAFE were to continue, it should be equally enforced on trucks and SUVS. Imagine how fuel efficient an F-150 could be if, instead of inflating it as quickly as American asses are getting fat, they kept it the size of 20 years ago.
  23. The new Jetta is the best new small car for people who don't like the looks of the new Civic.
  24. Ever have an offer for a fantastic job that you would love to do, but the money just isn't there for you to be able to accept? Yeah, that's where I am right now. I realize there is something to be said for job satisfaction, but I still gotta pay my bills in the meantime. Anyway, I've held out so far, not turning them down but telling them that the money isn't there and I would be giving up too many benefits to make a move. They want to meet next week to offer me a 3rd time. Edit: and the job title... oh the job title. I covet that as much as anything else with associated with the job.
×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search