Jump to content
Create New...

Drew Dowdell

Editor-in-Chief
  • Posts

    55,281
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    481

Everything posted by Drew Dowdell

  1. No, the ones that they give out the free oil changes for are more serious than a typical TSB. My point is that just having a recall does not indicate the severity of the issue. The only recall on my Buick has been the passenger seat bolt may not be torqued to spec. Toyota has issued a TSB for brake lights not coming on due to incorrect brake pedal installation and Tacoma tailgates that collapse under weight. Which of those should be a recall and which should be a TSB? That is not the same thing as saying a lower number of problems. And in the case of GM, they recalled vehicles that didn't necessarily need to be recalled to err on the side of caution.
  2. That's overly simplistic and I'm surprised you would suggest that. Toyota and Honda have issued secret recalls for years. They issue a TSB and then send out mass mailers to owners for a free oil change and fix the issue as part of the oil change. None of those numbers show up in the list above. When GM did its ignition recall, they recalled far more than they had to. They recalled the Alero, Grand Am, and Intrigue, but those had dash mounted ignitions which were different than the rest of the fleet and not part of the overall issue. In both cases, it's a matter of PR. GM recalled more than they needed to appear to be doing something. Honda/Toyota hid theirs via TSBs to avoid the publicity. Jaguar recalled vehicles to place a sticker, something that could have been a TSB. In the end, it means the number of recalls per vehicle sold is not an accurate way to judge.
  3. Number of recalls per vehicle sold doesn't tell you anything. Jaguar recalled the S-Type once to place a missing sticker in the engine bay that basically read "Don't drink the antifreeze". I think they should have left the sticker off and let the problem of people drinking antifreeze sort itself out.
  4. A lot more Camryish in these pictures than in the preview picture from last week.
  5. CPO loaded 300S or 300C V6 can be had for about $24k - $27k. Knowing the cars you like, that might suit you.
  6. I hope so!
  7. That is a pretty decent improvement in profile. Now it looks more like a shrunken Sable instead of a shrunken Taurus. The interior looks like a good upgrade too,.
  8. Oh, not as an acquisition for myself. I already know what is on my radar and none of them are CVTs. The CVT isn't the deciding factor though.
  9. I think Toyota did it to counteract and leftover thoughts about their little sudden acceleration issue a few years ago. Sure most people have forgotten about it now, but these production plans would have been put in place that long ago.
  10. It definitely depends on who built it. Toyota's Hybrid Synergy Drive is just a really fancy sounding way of saying "CVT with two power inputs instead of one" and Pruises and Camry Hybrids go over 150k miles regularly. As do the Ford hybrids with the same basic setup. The early Nissan CVTs did have reliability issues.
  11. Well, it's not going to look anything like that. My bet is that Hyundai is just trying to beat VW to market. @dfelt, so much of the R&D is done already. 90% of the interior and mechanical bits are probably found on the Santa Fe.
  12. The Lacrosse has an Eassist. I doubt Paul would want a Regal. He like posh old school luxury like I do.
  13. I'm willing to give this new generation of CVT a chance
  14. Also "don't buy the Buick" is what Paul is lamenting about. He likes the Buick and has been a Buick driver most of his life, but the packages offered aren't competitive. Not being able to keep loyal buyers is a problem.
  15. Don't get sucked into the smk trap of comparing only on base price. Few of the base model Lacrosses are ever even built.
  16. 3800, 4100, 3100, 3900, 4900. Civic back in the 70s was badged that way too.
  17. That's a valid point that gets invalidated by the Avalon and ES, and to a degree even the Mazda 6 now that it got a super nice new interior. Mazda is doing "Quiet Tuning" without calling it that.
  18. None of that is the point. Toyota, Mazda, Accord are offering it standard or option on base models. Buick makes you pick the top of the line trim and then charges you a lot more on top of that. I have the same opinion about Car Play being a $350 option on BMW and Benzes, sometimes requiring an infotainment system upgrade also, but standard on a Sonic.
  19. The CVT is all about cost and fuel economy. As you point out, modern automatics are very seamless these days, so they're not doing it for that reason. I have some suspicion that some vendor came out with a technological advancement to CVT design and is shopping it around to the manufacturers. Hyundai is moving the Elantra to a CVT also and making great claims as to its feel. Toyota did similar. Nissan is claiming advances with their CVT. It's odd they all come up with it a same time.
  20. For me, it's a nice easy Fifty Thirty. 307ci - 5030cc
  21. Yeah, I don't think totally alacarte is the way to go either, but some things need to be decoupled from the high price option packages, especially if they are safety items like blind spot monitoring or automatic cruise control. Accord, Camry, Corolla, Avalon (most of the Toyota line really) are all coming with these things standard now, it's time for GM and Ford and others to step up. The Mazda 6 comes with it standard on the Touring model and it's available for just $625 on the base model. That is a very fair way to do it. On the Regal it is still a $1600 option on the GS! Automatic Cruise and automatic forward braking doesn't become an option until you're in the highest non-GS trim, and then it still costs $2500 in packages to get. It is simply uncompetitive.
  22. I haven't noticed any quality issues with Envision... it is just completely anonymous to me....even as a current Buick owner I can't get excited for it. It's another one that is packaged weirdly compared to the competition. The base 2.5 has to go... GM did "ecoboost" before Ford did, that is turbo with direct injection, putting it attainable cars at the start. The 2008 Cobalt SS is arguably more attainable than a 2010 Taurus SHO. The Regal Turbo (2009) and Verano Turbo (2013) were both out before and at the same time respectively as the Fusion Ecoboost (2013). Your argument is correct however if you are saying that Ford was first to put Turbo+DI at the bottom end of the option packages. the Explorer was the first to get a Turbo+DI as a base engine.
  23. Here's an example: Perhaps the most direct competitor to the Buick Lacrosse is either the Toyota Avalon or the Lexus ES. The Avalon comes standard with active cruise, lane departure, automatic high beams. You can bet the new ES will come with all of that standard as well. You can't get any of that until you option up to the very top non-Avenir package and then it is still an additional $1600 on top of that. To add insult to injury, the Corolla even comes standard with that tech now. Then, as @Paolino has pointed out, rain sensing wipers aren't even an option on the Lacrosse but are available in my Encore. I get that premium brands want to charge extra for things (Benz and BMW charge you extra for Apple Car Play when it is standard in just about every mainstream brand vehicle), but even just forcing people into top of the line trim before making a feature available isn't very good business.... especially safety features. It's not just Buick either. I've seen other GM brands doing this with the newer models also.
  24. Buick lately is being packaged uncompetitively. I get that they're trying to be a premium brand, but many of the combinations don't make sense in light of what the competition is offering.
×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search