Jump to content
Create New...

Drew Dowdell

Editor-in-Chief
  • Posts

    55,281
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    481

Everything posted by Drew Dowdell

  1. New ways to make an old technology viable for the future is not "living in the past". Keeping the old technology around just because and ignoring the consequences of that technology would be living in the past.
  2. I may be behind a bit, I thought he wasn't governor anymore.
  3. That site is owned by gasbuddy. It's just one of their local urls they use for search engine optimization.
  4. Well they're building Velar 2-door coupes... I'm sure it is just a vanity exercise.
  5. i'm surprised they weren't branded Lancias the way Sergio works.
  6. Happy Birthday @caddycruiser Good meeting you a few weeks ago, hope you have a good one.
  7. This. You know what would turn the ES's fortunes around? The debut of an attractive new grille design that eventually is adopted by the entire brand.
  8. The woman on the right is soooo me..... .not that I'd remember his name anyway
  9. I can't even tell with anything online anymore.... have to be so serious about everything and take it as it as written.
  10. They made them, yes. But they were meant for testing only and they specifically warned VW against using them in production.
  11. Which is exactly why Toyota shouldn't bother spending the money to change it. Sometimes, the status quo really is sufficient and spending money just to change it doesn't have any ROI.
  12. My point is that the numbers you are looking at are unreliable. Both companies use TSBs and Recalls, however what constitutes a recall v. TSB is inconsistent. Thus, only looking at the number of recalls per vehicles sold doesn't give an accurate picture. It could be AMC v. Datsun v. Trabant for all I care... if companies aren't treating the issues the same, then the numbers per brand are meaningless for comparison.
  13. The sedan market as a whole is in decline. Adding a 2.5T isn't going to change that. Fusion sales weren't turned around by the Fusion Sport. Accord sales slid after dropping the V6 in favor of a 2.0t... and in a car that I believe is the current best in class. Mazda 6 sales are not going to explode with the intro of a 2.3t. Altima isn't going to take over the market by dropping their V6. Cherokee is not going to suddenly eclipse the CR-V now that a 2.0T is available in addition to a V6. The previous generation Navigator couldn't be saved by its Turbo V6. The number of vehicles where sales stayed flat or fell after switching to a turbo-4 is far far greater than vehicles that increased in sales after a switch to turbo-4 from a V6. You latch on to these single aspects as if that one single thing is the sole arbiter of the fate of a vehicle. Not only that, but you stake your position on something that is demonstrably wrong.
  14. I do want to correct one thing above. Volvo is not aiming for 100% EV, they are aiming for 100% electrified. That means hybrid, even as little as an eAssist type setup. Ram's Etorque counts as electrified and it's just eAssist.
  15. That should be a recall also, you're making my point for me.
  16. So what? It works. It's reliable. It's cost effective. It performs excellently both in acceleration and MPG. It is incredibly smooth. I don't care if it was designed 1979. You simply want change for change sake. If I buy a 2019 ES, I'm not getting a 10 year old V6.... I'm getting a new V6 that was built just a few months ago. Does it perform the way I want? Yes? Good! Sold. You care about things that no one else who actually buys cars actually cares about.
  17. Engine platforms aren't just an app that you can download...."Oh, I'll just develop a 2.5 liter turbo V6 today!" It takes hundreds of millions of dollars and has to fit with global designs. A 2.5 liter turbo V6 isn't doing to do much if any better than a 3.5 liter naturally aspirated. The Camry V6 does substantially better on the highway than its EPA rating. I have routinely gotten 35mpg highway out of the old Avalon with the 6-speed driving it like I stole it. That 3.5 is used in a whole bunch of Toyota vehicles. The ES being the best selling in its segment, I wouldn't want to change the formula much if I were Lexus. Changing from a 3.5 V6 to a Turbo-4 isn't going to increase sales for them and buyers who want fuel economy will just buy the hybrid. There is literally zero financial or practical reason for Lexus to do what you suggest.
  18. There has always been something slightly redeeming to me about both the Outlander and Outlander Sport. Yes they're dated, but they do their jobs well especially for the price you'll pay and the warranty that comes with it. It's kinda buying a poor man's LR Defender in 2017.... You don't expect much in creature comforts, but you get everything you expect and enough capability to get you there.
  19. can we talk about the naming? I'm getting dizzy....
  20. What is the business case? Sell it to me in cost savings or additional sales. Keep in mind that the ES and Avalon V6 are already capable of Low-mid-30s in mpg on the highway. The full Hybrid without a turbo only manages to increase that to 41. The V6 is in use in a bunch of other cars on this platform. V6es are smoother than 4-cylinders and smoothness is something Lexus has a reputation for. So what is the benefit to Toyota or to the customer to engineer a different engine into it?
  21. Because we all know you need at least 350 hp to get to the Old Country Buffet after bingo. This is the exact target market where enough horsepower is plenty. One thing that I'll give Toyota here is that their 3.5 V6 outperforms its spec sheet. The Avalon is way faster than it ever needs to be. With the 8-Speed and lighter weight over the previous model, this ES should satisfy the performance needs of the target market while still being very fuel efficient. But hey, maybe they should spend $15k more to get a lower power Benz with plastic seats.
  22. I think all of them could should be recalls, but only 1/3rd of them were. The Tacoma tailgate could fail with as little as 150 lbs of weight on it... that means, me standing on the tailgate could potentially collapse it and I would be injured, probably severely.... but it was just a TSB. See now why I don't put much stock in number of recalls per vehicles sold?
×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search