2006 2005 % Chg per S/D 2006 2005 %Chg
Tahoe 10,146 9,151 6.6 120,723 123,202 -2.0
yeah, huge tank there....
because you take joy in seeing GM fail.
Toyota's hybrid strategy, much like their EPA estimates, is much better on paper. Sure it's great for PR, but GM's strategy has a much more favorable environmental impact, much like GM's EPA estimates. Aura brings the hybrid much more mainstream. The Vue hybrid does a better job environmentally than the Highlander and does it for cheaper. So just like the Viper that on paper should kick the Z06's ass, in the real world, the Z06 pwnes it.
The Hybrid game isn't over... simply because Toyota hasn't entered the area where the points count the most.
What kind of logic dysfunction is that? DCX's and BMW's eagerness to embrace Blutec is simply a comfort move. They've been selling diesels for years. They're good at it. It's what they do. I, for one, welcome any advances in fuel economy and environmental impact. Let me flip the question, why hasn't Toyota pursued advanced diesel technology like GM, Honda, DCX, VW, and BMW have?
GM delivered hydrogen Equinoxes to the DoD in Washington DC and to end users in NYC and LA. Delivered..... as in... on the road.
I'm not Kim Il Jong, I'm Mahmoud Ahmadinejad!
GM is doing substantially, measurably, better. The market share losses are slowing, profitability is returning, quality is improving dramatically. Are they done yet? No, but Japan has once again woken a sleeping giant.
which is why it is important to have awesome vehicles at both end of the fuel economy spectrum. Cobalt, HHR, Solstice, Sky are all great, higher mileage vehicles, and sell well, with little to no incentives. The Vette, GMT-900s, V-series are all great lower MPG vehicles.