Drew Dowdell

Call it the Cadillac Escalade 16. I like the Blackwing name for an engine, but it is too contrived for an opulent trim a la Denali.

Paying for 50mbps, getting 60mbps when hard wired. Sometimes I can get 60mpbs over wifi, but often it will drop to 1.5mbps. I regularly drop Zoom and Teams calls if I'm in my office. I have the Extreme as the router on the first floor, I have another Extreme that was surplus equipment set up as an extender in my second bedroom on the second floor, and have an Express as an extender on the third floor that also acts as a network port for my big color laser.

I should add that it is only on Wifi that the speeds are slow. If I hardwire into the router, I get faster than the speeds I'm actually paying for.

I have been using Apple Airport Extreme plus an Express as a wifi extender for years now. The one I have is from 2013. Lately I've been having trouble with it in that even if I have full signal, my speeds are laughably slow. This isn't good for working from home. Unfortunately, Apple stopped making the Airport series after 2016, which is a shame because they really the best routers of their day. The problem that I'm encountering is that most routers have absolutely garbage reviews. Here's what I'm looking for: 1. Wifi6 and Mesh with at least one additional access point - I buy bleeding edge because I want the product to last me many years as my Airports have. 2. Cost no more than $300 - even this amount is high, but I'm realizing that if I don't want garbage, I can't be spending $89 on a router. 3. At least 2 lan ports on the base station. What I don't want: 1. ISP based router - I have Verizon Fios. Their router is $299 but is so locked down you can't really do much more with it. You cannot change the DNS servers it uses which is a privacy concern. 2. A router that is going to collect my personal information for Chinese companies or anyone for that matter. This eliminates the TP-Link brand as it has been revealed that their routers are storing your information and browsing history in order to sell ads. (Verizon does this too, but you can change the DNS settings to avoid it) 3. Google Wifi/Nest or Amazon Eeos routers - I may end up going with the Google Wifi because that's what my parents use and its been very good for them, but I have privacy concerns with Google and I'm trying to DeGoogle my life. I don't trust Amazon/Alexa and that is built into the Eeos routers. Google Wifi/Nest uses older Wifi technology and is not very future proof, the Nest versions have Google Assistant built in and I have the same concerns there as with Alexa.

I've done this for the Toronado as sometimes parts for it are hard to source. I have a collection of some of the hard to source parts from when they end up in the virtual clearance bin at RockAuto. Weird stuff like turn-signal switches, suspension parts, etc. When I first bought it I snagged a pair of front shocks, AC Delcos, for it for $8 each on clearance and had a local shop put them on. I did it for the Encore a couple times when I bought the parts intending to do the work myself, but then couldn't find the time to do it. The Buick dealership didn't give me any lip about it because I had bought genuine AC Delco still sealed in the box.

I'm surprised I didn't answer this thread when it was started, but I'm sure NONE of you can guess my lineup. /s 1. Olds - Torque 2. Buick - Torque 3. Chevy - Ease of service and easily sourced parts. 4. Pontiac

Do what @balthazarsaid, but on supply line valves, I always replace them with quarter turn valves. They don't seem to have the problem you described. Much more reliable.

I still have yet to figure out if I have a locking transfer case or not. The difference between Auto and 4H for me is that the front wheels are engaged, but the front diff is not locked in Auto. 4H locks the front diff. At least that’s my understanding.

In Sweden, all of their ships have barcodes. So when they return to port they scan da navy in.

Hey @balthazar, do you have 2H/Auto/4H/4L on your truck or just 2H/4H/4L? If you have auto, do you notice any difference in your truck when you're running that way verse 2H?

I started looking at these with an eye on 4-5 years down to road to replace the Chrysler 300C (Yes, I'm aware I just bought it and I'm aware I have a problem). But the interiors are terribly blah.... why can't we get an EV with a decent interior?! Right now the Defender and Rivian R1S are tops on the list. I did go test drive a Defender with my best friend on Friday.

I'm sure of it. 65 - 70 was the sweet spot for MPG for that car.... 32ish mpg highway was possible if it was just me. Put some people in it and it would drop because of the mountains around here. I could see as much as a 5mpg drop by going 75 instead of 70.

Denver to Columbus is downhill. Lee Iacocca pulled the same trick in a Mustang 60ish years ago.

A lot of the Anti-EVers like to say "Well, your EV is powered by coal! Coal is what is used to generate your electricity!" Well... that's become less and less true. It's time to start retiring that line. According to the Energy Information Administration - U.S. Renewable Sources Generate More Electricity Than Either Coal or Nuclear and Begin to Close the Gap with Natural Gas For the period January - September, solar-generated electricity – including distributed solar - expanded by 22.1% (compared to the same period in 2019) and provided more than 3.4% of the nation’s total. Wind grew by 12.2% and accounted for 7.9% of total generation. Combined, net electrical generation by wind and solar was 15.0% greater than a year ago. Electrical generation by geothermal energy and hydropower also increased - by 3.3% and 0.1% respectively - while that from biomass fell by 2.1%. Together with wind and solar, renewables provided 20.5% of total electrical output - up from 18.4% a year earlier. Moreover, renewables' share of U.S. electrical generation has eclipsed that of nuclear power (19.4%) and coal (18.6%). Renewables produced almost a tenth (i.e., 9.8%) more electricity than coal through September 2020. In fact, electrical generation by coal was 23.5% lower than a year earlier. In addition, renewable energy sources produced 5.2% more electricity than did nuclear power whose output fell 1.8% during the same nine-month period.

I agree with most of this, however, there are some people who are against progress of any sort and just hate it to hate it. They hold the view that "It won't work for me today, so that means it will NEVER WORK FOR ANYONE EVER!". Tesla was a game changer for EVs. It made EVs substantially more accessible to more people, not just in cost, but in range. Before Tesla, most EVs topped out at 120 miles or 150miles max. It doesn't matter if you were Jeff Bezos, that is a deficit of utility that those EVs could not overcome. Telsa coming out with 250, 300, 350, 400 mile ranges meant that suddenly the vehicle was usable to 99.9% of trips with no range anxiety. Yes they are still more expensive than regular cars, but now you don't have to be Jeff Bezos to own one. EV development will largely be incremental from here on out. There is really no need for a range beyond 400 miles in a standard passenger, so rather than adding additional range, manufacturers are going to start to work on things like charging speed and battery size... neither of which will generate much in terms of headlines. So, you're correct that the next Tesla with a 350 mile range is going to be 105% of the current one, that means the 30 minute charge from 0%-80% will take 28 minutes instead of 30, but also the battery will weigh less and the car will improve its regen efficiency. Battery cost will also stay flat or go down making it more accessible to more people. So, it's really only a matter of time before EVs become ubiquitous even if you don't personally own one.

That was definitely the case with the Encore.

I'll be coming up on the Avalanche's first oil change soon. The Chrysler still has a while to go. I drove it yesterday and Albert has hardly put any miles on it at all.

I’m.... not seeing locomotive in the current crop of Chevy trucks. Where are you seeing it?

The Bolinger is what Gru from Minions would drive if they ever did a live action version of the movie.... except it would be nuclear fission powered or something.

Cool I guess. (see what I did there?) But the other two vaccines don't require that sort of cold storage. The Pfizer vaccine is probably only going to be used for frontline healthcare workers. The third vaccine coming can be stored in a standard freezer purchased at lowes.

I've seen the Bolinger in person. It's what happens when someone gets an EV powertrain and has a bunch of flat sheet metal, an arc welder, a JC Whitney Catalog, and a few rolls of remnant office carpeting laying around. They had a booth at the L.A. show the same year the Rivian debuted.... and I was like, "You can't be serious.... "

There's a number of flaws with this, it makes assumptions that aren't part of reality. It assumes that everyone would plug-in and charge their vehicle at the same time. I think everyone here can agree that would not be the case. Also, most modern chargers are, or have the capability to be, smart chargers. They can be set up to only charge at the rate required to get to the desired level of charge by a specific time and during specific hours. What do I mean by that? I'll give you the scenario... these numbers are made up for this illustration, but the actual numbers work the same way. You drive your Tesla home from work and it has a 60% charge left. You've had a long day and don't intend to go out again that evening when you get home at 6pm. Because you want to preserve your battery health as long as possible, you've already set your Tesla to only charge up to 80% capacity. You plug your car in at 6, but because you get a lower electricity rate starting at 11pm, your charger doesn't start charging the car until 11. You tell the car that you want to be at 80% charge by 7am tomorrow. Once the charger kicks in, it only charges at the rate required to get you to 80% at 7am when starting charging even though the charger can go faster. This is much better for the battery as slow charging is better. So instead of running at the max 11.5 kWh, the Tesla charger will run at say, 8kWh. The reason the electric rate is cheap from 11pm to 6am is because that's when usage is lowest. It's the best time for EVs to charge. It takes a long time for power plants to ramp up and ramp down demand (unless they're NatGas Spiker units only used for unplanned spikes in demand). So a lot of energy gets wasted during this low demand period. A bunch of EVs charging at night would smooth out demand for utilities significantly. Do we still need more capacity? Yes. Do we need as much as this article is claiming? No

@ocnblu Did you see the new color for Jeep for 2021?

You'll probably be shopping for the new platform by the time you're ready to trade, so everything you know about the current vehicle will be out the window. The one I specd out was $79,500 in Forest Green w/Green Interior and 7 seats.

I learned a long time ago to not read Facebook comments as they are generally from people who are unhinged and/or without a firm grasp on reality. A bunch of keyboard warriors who can barely make the payment on their '15 Malibu are not Cadillac's target market. If Cadillac makes a product with a powertrain equal or greater than Tesla and actually puts some style back in their vehicles (unlike the puke worthy stuff they have out now - excepting remaining CT6 and '21 Escalade) then I'll be back in the Cadillac camp.... but they've gotta make the vehicles look GREAT.