Never could a comparison be more off IMO.
The GTO was a "bust" because it was BLAND. It had bland styling and NO PERSONALITY.
It wasn't a bad performing car, it wasn't overpriced, but it sure wasn't a "GTO" from a GTO purist's point of view.
The Challenger is anything BUT bland.
Your "opinion" is completely biased, it has no basis in FACT, only what you WISH.
Many Mopar guys have no interest in the first year cars, aside from the obvious being they ARE first year cars many are waiting for another obvious available with the '09 cars. MANUAL TRANSMISSIONS.
The 5.7 Hemi gets a big boost in horsepower as well as more ecomonomical 5.7 Hemi cars and 3.5 V6 cars in a crazy gas price situation. Plus the markups will fade away.
The Challenger's weight is for the top of the line SRT8 version, with all the doo-dads. It is what it is, but it's a NICE CAR TO DRIVE, has alot of accessories, has top of the line underpinnings such as suspension/wheels/brakes, and it makes no excuses. It doesn't NEED to. Drive the car or read reviews. You'll learn yet. :AH-HA_wink:
The Camaro will be very similar in weight when comparably equipped despite your denial attempts, and it will also be a nice car to drive with lots of accessories and impressive performance if it comes out anything like I think it will.
Neither car will weigh near the Mustang's numbers and neither car will be as small or as light.
All three cars are what they are. I find all three impressive, but I like the Challenger and the Mustang, and you CAN'T.
You know what I mean....... :wink: