Northstar

I picked the Nomad because you do have to be pretty creative to improve upon it, as it is already very good. I'm guessing we'll see a few convertibles, though that's not what I'm doing.

That is definetly a good sign for GM. If GM can attract young customers with their new products, then they have a great shot at growing market share later on (as the young buyers get older and buy more GM products).

The Solstice should have as much luggage space as the Miata, seeing as how it is a bit bigger than the Miata. I don't think it does have as much luggage space because my Uncle's '92 Miata can easily fit a golf bag, and the only golf bags I've seen put into a Solstice was a tiny bag WITHOUT clubs. BTW, I heard C&D picked the Solstice over the Miata in a comparo in the Oct. issue (haven't gotten it yet so I don't know for sure, but that's what someone posted on another forum).

Interesting, so it's the first Sub-Theta we've seen, meaning it's smaller than the VUE and Equinox. I'm glad it's not the Envoy or Lambda, because they need to apeal more to big families and soccer moms than a sub-Theta would, and I'm not too sure the vehicle pictured would go over well with soccer moms, but might go over better with younger people.

I just saw it on TV last night for the first time, it was a great commercial!

Hopefully this one is a bit tougher than most of the others I've posted.

Yes, it is a '40 Buick.

Well yesterday I went to a little fair type thing where I live and they have a bunch of old cars there... unfotunately I got there too late I guess and there was only one left. I think they must have taken them home for the night or something and I might go back today to see if they're back. Anyways, here's the two pics I took of this car. Tell me what year, make, and model it is.

I found this at C&D forums. From MT (Oct. issue): 0 – 60 MPH: 3.5 sec Quarter Mile: 11.5 sec @ 127 MPH Braking, 60 – 0 MPH: 104 Feet Lateral Acceleration: 1.05 G From C&D (Oct. 2005): 0-60 in 3.6 sec. 0-100 in 7.9 sec. 0-150 in 17 sec. Skidpad = 0.98g ¼ mile: 11.7 sec @ 125 MPH Motor Trend: (June 2005) “Ford GT vs. Ferrari F430” 0-60: Ford GT: 3.6 Ferrari F430: 3.8 1/4 mile: Ford GT: [email protected] Ferrari F430: [email protected] Motor Trend: (June 2003) “Dodge Viper SRT-10” 0-60: 3.9 1/4 Mile: 11.8 @ 123.6 Road & Track: MB McLaren SLR 0-60: 3.5 sec 1/4 [email protected] sec @126.1 0-100: 7.5 sec Here are some comparison numbers between the Z06, Viper, and GT: Z06 0-100 in 7.9 GT 0-100 in 8.6 Viper 0-100 in 9.6 Z06 0-150 in 17 GT 0-150 in 19.5 Viper 0-150 in 24.1 Here is a little blurb from MT: "The most entertaining part of the Nurburgring F1 track is the high-speed kink called Hatzenbach Bogen. While F1 cars car routinely see 180 mph and 2g lateral loads, the Z06 - without the aid of thousands of pounds of downforce - managed a respectable 120 mph while delivering a 1.0g force, sustained for a second and a half. It's that combination of unflappable grip and seemingly endless grunt the Z06 manages so well. Nothing seems too great a task, and only your instinct for self-perservation gets in the way of attempting the impossible." The Z06 some AMAZING! Bravo Chevy! :metal: :bowdown: :bowdown: :chevy:

0-60 in 10 seconds? I think they weren't driving correctly or something. Autoweek had a VERY positive review on it, and if I remember correctly said the ride was more firm than the Miata but didn't ever feel harsh. I think I'd listen to an Autoweek review more than a Toronto star review.

Yeah, the cars don't have to be just GM cars. Hell, you could even do a comparo thing like HHR vs. PT vs. Element vs. xB or something (or some other comparo). I think this is a good idea; maybe it could just go into the Member's Articles section?

Congrats. By all options, do you mean you got all of the accessories too? Also, does it have NAV?

Nope, not a Maserati or Ford.

I've got no idea. How about another hint?

Yes it's a concept. Not from the 70s though.

I think this is the GMC Lambda most likely. I don't think I really like it, but perhaps it will look better in person.

2 8

First, let me say that we had a very successful competition I feel, and there are a lot of very good entries. Also, if you entered the competition, you MUST vote, or you will be penalized (points subtracted). Artists should also not vote for themselves; if they do, they will also be penalized. Here is how voting will work: Each person will get two votes. Their first place vote will count as two points, and their second place vote will count as one point. An example of how to vote is below. Let's say you think entry number 1 is the best and entry number 2 is the second best, you would post this: 1 2 Easy enough? Voting will end when I get home from school on Wedensday (probably around 5PM Eastern Time). Here are the entries: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Let the voting begin!

The competition is now over. Voting will begin shortly.

Well the deadline is EST so it's not 12:01 AM for you (or me), NOS.

There are about 20 mins left before the competition is closed and voting will begin.

He went from Carnage to Sevyrdsoul to C.H.U.D.

Nope, not from the 80s or 90s.

Crispey stepped down on the old board I believe because of lack of time for the site, I haven't seen Scott back, Walt hasn't been back, and I'm not sure what happened with budman and chris.

If it's not too retro (or looks awesome if it is) then I'd consider buying one. I don't want a Mustang knock-off and I don't want it as retro as the Mustang. If the interior is crap like the Mustang's then I probably won't buy it either.