Jump to content
Create New...

TurboRush

Members
  • Posts

    355
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by TurboRush

  1. as far as I thought I knew, GM's partnership with Subaru (fuji heavy industries) was "no-more" but I'm not shure if that terminates any of the plans they had to build vehicles together for Saab....... hope it has put an end to it and hope they'll give Saab the green light to come up with stuff of their own and once again put value behind it's brand!
  2. http://driving.timesonline.co.uk/article/0...1868180,00.html key point:
  3. BV, like wyldman said, I'd take it to shop class...... talk to you shop class teacher and make it a project to figure out whats wrong and then they can fix it. Schools can get prety good discounts on parts and you get the teachers knowledge...... Personaly, I've thought this whole time that the ticking is probably a bad valve (bent, lifter is not lifting or whatever...) and now this.... I believe you also have a failed head gasket and is allowing coolant to seap into the combustion chanber, thus raising temp due to lack of lubrication, then raising coolant temp and coolant pressure goes u and dumps more coolant in the combustion chamber.... vicious cycle that will toast your engine in a jiffy if you don't have another serious look at it before even thinking of driving it again...... If I were you, I'd do an oil change today/ tomorow THIS WEEK END to see what is up.... you could also remove a spark plug and flash a light in there to see if you can possibly notice liquid on top of the piston...... other than possibly an engine related problem.... would a clogged cat converter possibly cause the engine to overheat? I know it backs up exhaust and of course everything will get super hot and performance would diminish.... but if he doesnt find anything in the oil, could checking the cat converter also be in the books?
  4. Ok, good because I'd hate my dad to just go an buy it then realize its junk ....... And yea, the new hoods are realy nice the way they bulge up at the front (kinda like a 3/4 ton pickup's hood on the comercial chev's) And those rims...... aaaaaahhhhh
  5. hey z28Luvr01, is that hypertech thing worth it?
  6. The rims were an option for the truck...... 20 inchers...... :) that was one of my first questions. hehe
  7. Hey guys! My dad just got an '06 Silverado and is already planning on a new dual exhaust system. One day we were waching "Powerblock TV" on Spike and Stacey was tuning some truck and was showcaising a little gadget that you could "up" the hp of the engine if you were towing or you could lower hp and save gas mileage...... anyone know of this device, where it could be found or any other suggestions for engine management tuning? Thanks! here's the subject that will be used :)
  8. I liked the old saturns.... the new ones scare me........ Bring back Olds!
  9. Those are nice pictures....surprised you took the time to look for them.... the MFI 13 (sonett II) in yellow that you have pictured above was apparently the first "production" model and isnt my favorite either....... but I do find it has a nice rear waistline..... it flows a bit better on the last production model (Sonett III). As for your comparison, those are 2 totaly different monsters you are comparing..... that's like putting the corvette z06 against the solstice..... different handling different drive..... the sonett is way lighter, has totaly different choice of engine(s) (over the years) and is different caracter.... you look at lines, I look at the overall car and what it will do for me..... each car has their own caracter..... you seem to have picked yours.... I havent picked any..... I don't like buicks, you dont see me Buick bashing, now do ya <_< To add to the nice pictures, this guy fully restored his Sonett 3 and swaped out the V-4 engine for an I4 Turbo 16v mounted on the rear and slightly extended the rear to "finish" the nice flowing lines of the car:
  10. what the hell was she saying? couldnt make out 90% of the words..... the other 9.99% was screaming... and 0.01% was ... um.... jesus?
  11. Personaly, I find we all have our own taste and what you like and hate is not necesarely the same for your other fellow human beings........ the unreleased sonett that never made to production, I find is not all that great (this was in the 50's and styling was different) The sonett II that this the "MFI 13" I found to be unamusing.... but what Sason created... the "Catherina" was a beauty.... The Sonett III is decent but by far, the Catherina is awesome and I'd have one in my driveway if I could get my hands on one.... again, we each have our own tastes.... B)
  12. source: http://motoring.iafrica.com/carsinaction/shootout/477628.htm Sven meets the Huns By: Mario Lupini; Images: Ciaran Nunan Almost everyone knows that the horse-drawn carriage was the progenitor of the convertible automobile. In fact all cars at the turn of the 20th century were convertibles, but the death-knell of the convertible was dealt by the Dodge Brothers Victory 6 with its revolutionary all-steel monocoque body affixed to a normal ladder type chassis. The convertible has since become the playground for designers who have taken the shape to ever-exciting heights. In fact the convertible became the powder-puff segment of the car market. However with its inherent weakness due to the lack of its tin-top it has lagged in suitable stiffness without its structural support and stiffness. So any arch-car-enthusiast schooled in the ways of top road holding will discern the variances between the tin-top sibling and the open-top version as soon as corrugations are traversed on the road surface. But after all is said and done, wind-in-your-hair enthusiasts will still mumble: "To hell with all that technical jargon… I want a convertible." And they're right. Perhaps the wind-in-your-hair and starry skies above are far more important, not to mention the knock-you-over effect convertibles have on the beholder. Scuttle-shake eliminated Cars now suffer minimally with the 'scuttle-shake' syndrome due to the amount of R&D that has been put into them. The recently arrived Saab 9-3 2.0 TS Aero seems to have almost eliminated 'scuttle shake' with only slightest amount discernible and this only by checking the offending minute vibration on the inside rear-view mirror on the windscreen. To better evaluate the Saab 9-3 Convertible we managed to rustle up two of its most natural rivals, the BMW 330Ci Convertible and Audi A4 3.0 Cabriolet. To the observer there is little to choose between these beautiful, sun-seeking machines with the choice coming down to whether you fancy the now-ageing Bee-Emm over the classic, understated form of the Audi or the sleek, swooping lines of the Saab. Due to the Saab's high waistline its standout feature is the treatment of the comparatively high rear deck with those two, neat 'streamline bulges' behind the rear seat headrests that are suitably hidden from view. They assist in hiding the protruding headrests so obvious on the Audi A4 and even more unsightly on the 330Ci. Superb cockpits The cockpits of the three are superb. And even though the Bee-Emm is the earliest in design terms it still stands out with the fine flowing shapes that ring the interior. The Saab is almost as delectable but the dash lacks flair and the overall interior feel has less flow in it. The Audi A4 is refined but oh-so Audi conservative. Naturally sun-seekers will mostly be driving with the hood down and to them it should be of interest to know that the Saab soft-top can be raised and latched in 20 seconds, the Bee-Emm's in 25 and the Audi's in a more leisurely 30. Road-holding is of a high quality on all three with the Bee-Emm having the edge with the Saab not far behind with its great improvement over its stodgy predecessors in this area. Whatever is said to the contrary, a finely balanced rear-wheel-driven car such as the BMW 330i is better disposed to road holding tuning. The Audi instead is roped with the extra weight of the front-wheel-drive portion of its all-wheel-drive leading to it being less responsive than both rivals. The Saab has overcome the negative idiosyncrasies of its front-wheel-drive set-up with a suspension layout that has been extensively upgraded, in particular the addition of ReAxs self-steering rear end on its advanced multi-link suspension. The Saab is somewhat lighter than its two rivals as both house bigger and heavier 3-litre 6-cylinder mills while the Saab uses a much lighter 4-cylinder 2-litre 16V DOHC motor… with a turbo. And that offers a wonderful power-to-weight ratio, which in turn assists in attaining better dynamic results. As a matter of interest the Aero is some 30kg lighter than the Bee-Emm with 14kW more power. Comparing fuel consumption One need only check out the fuel consumption figures to see the results. At 9.7 litres per 100km it gains a huge amount over the BMW's 11.5 and 11.3 of the Audi. It should be remembered that a turbocharger effectively adds the equivalent 50 percent of cubic capacity and power to an engine while being so much lighter. And when you consider the gains in test performance terms they are particularly pleasing. The Saab 9-3 Aero comes out tops. And as neither the Bee-Emm nor the Audi open-tops has the latest-generation engines under their bonnets they will continue to play second fiddle to the quick Swede. The best way to compare performance is over the standing quarter mile where the Aero's elapsed time of 16.1 seconds and top speed of 147km/h make it a sure challenge to the evergreen 330i's 16.3 and same exit speed. But where the Saab scores well over its rivals here is its EuroNCAP 5-star safety certification gained in June 2004. Its DynaCage rollover system with heavily reinforced windscreen and active pop-up bars that assist interaction with airbags, belts and other features is a big plus factor. Plenty of extra features The three have a host of features to long to mention here. Some of the more interesting on the Aero are the CargoSet Self Expanding Trunk, SAHR (Saab Head Restraints) that assist in reducing serious neck injuries by 75 percent, AVR (Advanced Voice Recognition) and foldable exterior mirrors. To take care of its top performance a Sports Chassis Kit is in also in place with a 10mm lowered suspension and stiffer shocks. At R459 000, the Saab Aero 2.0T Convertible 6-speed competes well in price terms when compared to the R476 000 of the BMW 330i Convertible AT or the R483 000 of the Audi A4 3.0 Cabriolet AT. And with the Saab Convertible you have something else that wind-in-your-hair buyer seeks. The two Germans are old-hat in terms of the market and with the sort of individualism open-top exhibit the rarity value of the Saab Aero is another factor they will find to their liking. And perhaps there has been some turmoil in the Saab market of late, but with the muscle of GM behind this fine marque these minor problems are now a thing of the past.
  13. original source: http://motoring.independent.co.uk/features/article325419.ece
  14. How sport combi first started.... info directly from saabmuseum.com
  15. NICE!!!!! hard to make out what is what with all the chrome but very nice!!! This one would be my trim model of preference if I were to buy one and if they produced the Turbo model./
  16. Dido, Right on the money...... Once GM has the time to truily focus on Saab (probably after its done with Cadillac, followed by Buick and Pontiac), then they will be able to build Saab back up the way it should have been a long time ago..... Let's hope that when they get around to Saab that it won't be too late! Sales are already up this year (especialy in europe) and the 9-3 is selling decently..... that's just the beginning...
  17. I'd like to meet prety much everyone on here.... very interesting bunch..... Wouldn't mind meeting up with Sixty8, BlackViper, and other diy'ers in this forum so we can share some knowledge and prolly help eachother diy projects.... (too bad we all live like 800 miles apart or something) Harley earl, Croc, probably be able to shoot an interesting conversation....... I don't post enough on C & G for you guys to realy be able to know me..... (used to be Dans900 before C & G's down time) All in all, most of you guys are all big car buff's like me and would all be interesting to meet! (GM car buffs realy)
  18. Oh god, that's exacly what I think of the infinity burble...... it sounds like a computer generated sound.... so artificial... :angry: Nothing like a true american/european v-8.... they're the only ones who seem to be able to make a decent sounding engine..
  19. -The original Jeep Cherokee -Ford Bronco II -GMC 1500 (Yukon? not shure if it was a yukon or a blazer or something) I'm actualy getting back in the groove of wanting an old truck....... I'm sort of inclined towards a bronco with their inline 6 and possibly adding a turbo to it or something.... that's in my dreams though....not shure if it will reach production in my driveway... hehe
  20. This is the part that got me the most..... all in all, I was sorta blown away at the good review. I realy like the idea of stainless steel bed rails in the cargo area for tie-down of your load..... I'd have to say the car is growing on me too.... Can't wait to see the fully redesigned one in 2009 or 2008...whenever it will be
  21. Ummmmm yeaH I think I fall in this category........ in order of first car to current... 1. '99 olds alero - lease in 2002 2. '88 boneville - bought in 2003 3. '93 cutlass supreme - bought in 2004 4. '02 saab 9-3 SE - financed in 2004 5. '92 saab 900 - bought 2005 6. '89 saab 900 Turbo - bought 2005 (2 months ago) and I'm 21. number 4,5 and 6 are still in my driveway but only two are being driven (number 4,6). I may buy a 4th saab next summer......... possibly next fall...... HELP!
  22. Check out the review on this site...... I find it to be a prety comprehensive review... http://www.parkers.co.uk/choosing/carrevie...x?model_id=1428
  23. I say throw a turbo on the 3500 and make it an ss
  24. I don't realy like the 2.2.......... it's lackluster...... the 2.4 on the other had has better low end grunt and is a much nicer engine to drive...
  25. Dont know if some of you guys have noticed but on a Saab, when you put the car in reverse, the extension of the headlights to the side is designed to illuminate around the car so you can see what is beside you. Look closer on the older 9-3's and 9-5's and you'll se that the lights have an ofset that sticks out and when reverse engaghed, the whole side of the headlight lights up the curb and then some.... mucha safer and kinda neat if you ask me! Check it out:
×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search