Jump to content
Create New...

smk4565

Members
  • Posts

    13,747
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    12

Everything posted by smk4565

  1. They could even do a Tahoe based Rainier Avenier and sell that too. At some point this crossover craze will come crashing down and I will love it. But that seems a way off, the Buick-GMC dealer stable could probably have 10 crossovers and 1 sedan in the showroom and the sedan would be the worst seller out of the 11.
  2. Enclave also went on sale before the Atlas, Ascent, Telluride, and Palisade hit the market. Now you have newly upgraded Mazda CX-9, Ford Explorer and Toyota Highlander too. And Pathfinder, Pilot, Traverse, Durango still in the 3 row space, with Jeep about to enter it. There are over a dozen 3-row SUVs in that $30-40k range starting price.
  3. I don't think they are worried about confusion when they have the Encore and Encore GX as 2 difference vehicles. I would have used Tracker here. Saved Trailblazer for a Jeep Wrangler/Ford Bronco competitor.
  4. It looks like a Volvo XC40 or that little Hyundai, I am over the "floating roof" already. Otherwise it looks fine, looks like a Blazer/Camaro for less money, looks much better than a Traxx. To me "Trailblazer" is better than "Blazer" so I don't know why they wasted the Trailblazer name here. Probably should have called this the Tracker.
  5. Buick could easily do an Envision GX between Envision and Enclave.
  6. Why didn’t they give it it’s own name rather than name it off the smallest car. That is worse than calling it Envision Sport. I imagine Buick will have no sedans post 2021 and will be all Chinese and Korean crossovers plus the Enclave.
  7. We all know you can’t kill a Toyota Hilux, maybe Toyota needs to advertise their durability more.
  8. There is no reason that Toyota couldn't build a chassis for the Tundra as good as F150 or Silverado's and this engine seems to be better than what anyone has now, and Toyota reliability is solid too. Toyota doesn't lack money or resources, they just don't seem to care about the Tundra, if they didn't, the 2019 Tundra wouldn't have the same engine as the 2007 Tundra.
  9. The G-wagon has 3 parts carried over from the old one, everything else is new for 2018.
  10. Tundra powertrains were born in the same day as dirt. They need to do something to to make their truck competitive and this seems like a good first step. What makes no sense to me is Toyota can win any spending battle they want with Ford and yet they let the F150 walk all over them.
  11. Renault has a pretty full line. They won't need Fiat, as Renault has small cars and small SUVs and commercial vans that they can co-develop the next generation Ram vans with Renault and sell those with different badges. Jeeps lets Renault strengthen their SUV line up if they need it. Dodge could be come the American version of Renault. Lot of possibilities here to merge the lineups and stream line it all.
  12. More and more auto companies will merge. I’d say this is a done deal and others will follow.
  13. Not a mistake the the best 2 are from Stuttgart. ? And the answer to this question is Toyota Corolla. Because if you don't care about cars you might as well get a cheap one and the Corolla will get you from point A to B in the most boring way possible.
  14. Boxter/Cayman/718. Mercedes SL, although that will likely become a 2+2 like the 911, only with the engine in front, as a way to replace the loss of other coupe/convertible Mercedes. I think Audi will go electric in a pretty big way, they like to push themselves as being tech focused where as Bentley and Lamborghini are old school big gas engine focused. Obviously they will need gas Audi's in the A4, Q5 level stuff, but the A8 might as well go EV now, they don't sell a lot and the S-class has been out powering and out performing that car forever so they might as well try something new.
  15. Kill Fiat in the USA for sure. If they want to move their Miata clone to Alfa Romeo with a 280 hp turbo 4 that could work. And they have to do something like that if they contracted with Mazda to build the 124 for a certain number of years. I think they can kill Chrysler also and move the Pacifica to Dodge.
  16. Diesel is going to be a rough go, and emissions will keep getting stricter and stricter so I wonder how long they can keep it going anyway.
  17. Apple should buy them but Elon isn’t going anywhere. He has too much stock, unless they way over pay him for his shares. Their brand equity is soo good they can ship a car with different color door trim and get away with it. If GM or Ford have a hood that is 2 mm off they get roasted. Side note, Doug Demuro says MBUX is better infotainment than Tesla’s.
  18. Tesla would be a great buy for Apple if they want into cars. And Tesla’s electronics are far ahead of the rest. And the real value would be in the data. Apple would be able to take all that driving data, how often people stop at Starbucks, when they charge, what restaurants they go to etc. Just like Google is tracking Internet traffic, Apple could do that with a car because Tesla owns the data on the car. I am sure there are restrictions on how it can be used but insurance companies would love that data for writing premiums and in claims handling.
  19. Time for Apple to buy them up.
  20. Just make more crossovers, problem solved,
  21. I am seeing those crossover coupes more and more, I could see cutting GLC coupe that seems to sell worse than the GLE. SLC is dead, And some of the coupes and convertibles will die because people don’t buy those anymore. They sold 2200 S-class coupe and convertible last year, that is a lot for a $150k vehicle so cutting that is curious but the new SL can replace those. They are also adding GLB, EQC, EQA, EQS and more so they don’t seem to be shrinking just rearranging the lineup.
  22. My statement what you have in bold states my belief that Cadillac is currently losing sales to Mercedes and others that have high performance SUVs. They easily lose 500 units just by not offering the product and I think Cadillac can get 500 people that were going to buy an Escalade anyway to pay an extra $60,000 for a V-series. They could sell 1,000 Escalde-V a year I think, 100 a month on average for a vehicle that has about 2,000 units a month volume I think is doable.
  23. Mercedes could lose sales if there was a 700 hp Escalade. That could eat into GLS63 or G63 sales. The performance SUV market is growing thankfully, I am sure Mercedes has lost sales the the Bentayga and Urus because the AMG SUVs, Cayenne Turbo and X5 M weren't the only game in town anymore. But there is more and more demand for this sort of thing. My point before was Cadillac is losing out on sales opportunity by not offering an Escalade-V or a CT6-V based crossover because all these other guys have ultra SUVs now. For some odd reason there is demand for sub 4 second 0-60 SUVs that can do 190 mph and get around the Nurburgring in under 8 minutes all while offering top end luxury.
  24. 500 a year which at a $60k premium for an engine swap, and beefed up brakes and suspension seems like a way to get an extra $40k profit per unit which is $20 million in extra profit. And they might be able to move 1,000 per year. But also the 500 they sell are not 500 sales lost to Mercedes or Bentley or someone else.
  25. Right, Cadillac doesn't really have any unique attribute or clear mission and that has been going on for 25-30 years. Even with the CT6 they talked about how shedding weight in every way possible was the focus, and yet their most successful product is a an overweight, 6,000 lb truck with a big V8. Then they did this big push how CTS and ATS are going to beat the 5-series and 3-series in performance and no one cared, because Cadillac buyers wants space and comfort, like in an Escalade. No focus, no clear mission.
×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search