Jump to content
News
Reviews
Discussons
Activity
Create New...
Close

smk4565

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    13,685

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    11

 Content Type 

Everything posted by smk4565

  1. smk4565
    They have to say that and aim for it, because GM could sell 3 million gas Silverados and Escalades this year and their stock price won't even move. If they sell EV's investors will come and drive the stock price. Electric is all investors care about, see Tesla as an example, they could go 10 more years without a profit and still be worth 20 times what Ford or GM are worth as a company. I agree that it is ambitious, I am not sure where the sales will come from either. Unless GM prices the EV Silverado the same as the gas Silverado and takes a loss on every one of them in the name of building stock price. GM could take an income loss, use the loopholes in the tax code to basically make it not matter, and draw in investor money by the billions.
  2. smk4565
    400 miles would be a lot of range for a pickup, I assume that will be a big battery, so that one will probably be pricey. But I imagine they will also have a smaller battery pack at a lower price point also, and there is a market that will pay big money for a pickup. Shareholders want EV's so car companies are going to build them no matter what.
  3. smk4565
    Toyota/Lexus leave product on market for a long time, and have a slow development time also. This helps with their reliability and reputation for quality, and thus their resale value. But where it hurts is having stuff like the Tundra without a major redesign since 2007, the Lexus GX hasn't had a big redesign since the day dirt was created, and Lexus hasn't come up with a real 3-row crossover when every other car company has them. They have the trucky LX570, but that is dated as can be and not competitive and they said they are killing the Land Cruiser, so that kills the LX off too. $63k for a Camry V6 powered RX is ridiculous, better to get a German product. I've rode in a current gen RX before, you can feel and hear the Camry-ness coming from the engine, transmission and suspension. It just isn't as refined as a Lexus should be.
  4. smk4565
    I am not saying a fly by night start up, it could be any company, Tesla, Stellantis, Daimler, or it could be a Chinese one. My point is that FedEx is going to buy the vehicle that best meets their demands. If the Brightdrop is the best fit, then they'll buy 10,000s of them. But that isn't because it from an American company.
  5. smk4565
    They should buy the best vehicle for their needs. That “Americans will/should buy American” is what doomed GM and Ford in the 70s and 80s. If the Japanese made a better car then Americans should buy the Japanese car because it it a better product. Ford and GM thought they could built crap and people would buy it anyway because it was made in USA. If some Chinese company comes out with an Electric delivery van with 25% lower operating cost and 25% better reliability than the Brighthouse then FedEx would be stupid not to buy it and would be hurting their own business not to buy it. It is up to GM to make the best delivery van if they want customers to buy it.
  6. smk4565
    I forgot I did read about that. I wonder if FedEx will replace all delivery vehicles with the ev600, but I suppose over 10 years or so GM can meet the demand.
  7. smk4565
    I smell a big EV Sprinter order coming.
  8. smk4565
    Well they desperately need new trucks. Those Grumman ones are super old and dated and I am sure not safe at all, probably pollute more than a modern V8 and get crap mileage since everything got bad mileage 30 years ago.
  9. smk4565
    I like the squared off angular DeLorean style look, especially in the front. What I don't get is why it is part hatchback, part SUV. Hatchbacks tend to not sell well in the USA, so I feel like this could suffer like the original Bolt did. The back 1/4 of this vehicle looks odd, needs more of an SUV look there I think.
  10. smk4565
    The Bolt just had a price drop. Tesla cut prices too. Battery tech improvements will help get battery cost down. There will be R&D and production cost savings when there is a scalable EV platform that can be used for everything from a Corvette to a Suburban, you just modify the size of the same design. In 2030 EV’s won’t have as bad as a price gap to ICE. And for luxury cars it won’t be noticeable. Jaguars cost Tesla money right now and offer less performance.
  11. smk4565
    Not 50% more, prices will level off and be pretty similar.
  12. smk4565
    But JLR can't spend R&D dollars on ICE and EV at the same time, they don't have the money to do that. I have also seen estimates that EV will be over 50% market share by 2030. I suspect there won't be a gas powered luxury car in 2030, unless it is like an Acura/Lincoln badge job car. The gas engine can't match the NVH and silent operation off an EV. Also on performance take any V12 super car and it can't match a Tesla. And EV technology is only getting better while emissions restrictions and CAFE are killing V12s and V8s.
  13. smk4565
    Moving to EV won't cause a drop in sales, building bad cars will. Electric propulsion is superior to a gasoline drivetrain. Going EV is the right move, but all their competitors will also, so I don't see what changes for Jaguar. The Germans will still build better cars than them.
  14. smk4565
    But a 2020 E-class doesn’t have an engine from a 2010 C-class. The oldest Mercedes engine right now is the 4.7 turbo V8 in the SL550 which it is in its final year. The next oldest is the 2.0 four that is from 2015 model year and they also just revised it for 2020 model year. The mild hybrid I6 in most Mercedes is from 2019 and the 4.0 V8 2016 and that also just got a redo and mild hybrid added.
  15. smk4565
    I don't like when Cadillac uses Chevrolet switchgear or sells a $60k XT6 with basically the same V6 a GMC Acadia had 10 years ago. And same goes for Lincoln or Acura that use Ford/Honda interior parts or an Accord V6 in a $55k MDX.
  16. smk4565
    The naming system and the 400, 500, 600 numbers is all a disaster. For example the Escalade gas and diesel engines have the same torque so they'd have the same number. Also changing naming schemes and throwing model names away every 10 years is not a good idea. That is why stuff like Camry and Corolla sell, those names have been around forever and people are familiar with them. I would guess 60% of the buying public doesn't even know what an XT6 is. They should also go back to word names. If word names are a bad idea then the Escalade name should be dropped immediately and the product changed to XT7. Also no other GM brand does an alpha-numeric naming scheme.
  17. smk4565
    Sales wise I mean. Tesla is #4 in sales for premium brands in the USA. The EQE and EQS aren’t half assed, they even built a new factory just for them and the S-class. EQC was half assed.
  18. smk4565
    EQC, but that was kind of half baked I think anyway. EQS and EQE are made on a Tesla like chassis while EQA EQB and EQC are batteries put in an ICE platform. They have an EQE SUV in the works but these Mercedes Electric vehicles better be good and have 1,000 hp AMG versions, otherwise Tesla will surpass them like they just surpassed Audi last year (in the USA).
  19. smk4565
    Everyone has announced that. They all have to do it because investors want it. And there is probably some fear about being late to the party, because if you miss out on the EV train your company is basically out of business.
  20. smk4565
    Jaguar might as well go all electric because the sales of the gas powered cars stink. Also it would be a waste of money to further develop their gas engines or to spend hundreds of millions on another XF or XJ or whatever. Better to put 100% of their money into EV's and I suspect the gas power Land Rovers still on sale in 2029 will look a lot like the ones they have now, and will be ancient by then. Also investors want to see EV's. Investors are seeing gas cars as a negative. Also why Tesla is worth more than the 7 largest car companies combined. If you don't do EV's you can't sell stock or get your stock price up, and that is what these CEO's care about.
  21. smk4565
    Lexus ES350 and Acura TLX are the same size as the CT5 and from a luxury make. You can say the CT5 is an E-class competitor, but Cadillac is severely outgunned on luxury and technology on that one.
  22. smk4565
    My point was just because the CT5 is E-class size, doesn't, mean it is E-class competition. Because a Camry or Sonata are the same size as a CT5 or E-class too. There are like 20 mid-size sedans out there, it is the most common size. I am sure Hellcat fans are saying how the Charger is cheaper and more powerful than a CT5 and therefore better, and not factoring in the Charger has a garbage interior and garbage handling.
  23. smk4565
    I imagine by 2030 level 2 autonomy will be mandated the way ABS is now. So every new car will have it. The S-class can go to level 4 on a gel-fenced area next year, so by 2032 I bet many cars are capable of that. I said Cadillac has better interiors than Tesla. But Tesla outsells Cadillac anyway. Not just auto pilot but all self driving systems.
  24. smk4565
    The XT5, XT4 interiors are nothing special, a Tesla Model S is as nice as those. Overall as a brand, Cadillac has better interiors than Tesla. But Tesla has more performance, Tesla's XT6 competitor is faster than a Corvette. Technology will play a role too, EV range, and most importantly brand image. Tesla outsells Cadillac now, I don't see why Tesla won't in 5 years.
  25. smk4565
    Humans kill 35,000 people a year in car crashes in just the USA. If semi-autonomous or autonomous drive even cut that in half, that is a substantial amount of lives saved.
×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

I've whitelisted
Continue without support

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search