Jump to content
Create New...

smk4565

Members
  • Posts

    13,764
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

Everything posted by smk4565

  1. The 3-series is the go to car for many, reputation alone will get it a ton of sales. The new C-class looks great, I have not driven one, I have driven the last 2 generations. The C400 is only 2 inches longer and 60 lbs heavier than a V6 ATS, still pretty close but Mercedes feel heavier and bigger than they are. The solidness and quietness I think translate to people thinking it is heavier than it is, people think my car is bigger and heavier than it is.
  2. Lexus RC is in this space now too and the V8 RC-F is like $62k so Lexus seems to have priced their car competitively. I think every Cadillac should have an 8 speed transmission standard, a new straight six would be nice also as a Cadillac exclusive engine.
  3. A loaded ATS is priced like a BMW or Mercedes but it isn't as good as those 2. Nor does the badge command the price. I think the ATS interior could be better, for sure roomier, and the V6 has no torque. A new engine and transmission would help. I don't think they should cut the price but I think they need to put more into the car.
  4. The Ford Transit and Transit Connect would have been a good blueprint to copy. There is a noticeable size and price difference between the two, they don't overlap and don't fight for the same customer, and they cover from small and cheap to large and expensive. GM should have done that with the pickups.
  5. "certain S-Class models from the 2011 and 2012 model years, including the S 550, and S 550 4-Matic, S 400 Hybrid, S 63 AMG, S 600 Bi-Turbo and S 65 AMG. 158 examples of the breed built between March 3rd through July 30th, 2011 have a glitch with the tire pressure monitoring system." It is 158 total cars, they don't make 158 model variations of the S-class, plus their factory can only produce a maximum of about 400 S-class per day and this is a 4-5 month time frame when only certain cars were affected. The Corvette, Silverado and Cruze are bread and butter products for GM, and the ATS and CTS are supposed to be import killers and world standard cars, but GM has fallen short on these cars with the build quality, the recalls, stop sales, etc. In W-body Impala, a cheap part that went defective causing a recall would not surprise me, but that shouldn't happen with this new wave or products. Cadillac wants to release a $90,000 sedan, why should anyone think it won't be recalled and have defective parts in it just like all the other GM cars? It is in their DNA to cost cut now and hope no one notices later.
  6. Agreed on the mini pickup, the Canyon/Colorado should have been in the $20-32k range, since the Silverado/Sierra start around $26k. In fact if you go to the GMC website it shows the Canyon with a base price of $26,725 and the Sierra with a price of $26,075. Doesn't make sense.
  7. 376 is a lot less than the 130,000 Toyotas recalled last week or the 25,000,000 vehicles that GM recalled this year. Every car maker has recalls, but the concerning thing of GM is it is almost every model over 10 year span. And after the first round the GM defenders said that the recalls were addressing old problems and the old way of doing business, while the new products were world class. Well the new products designed after bankruptcy are basically no better than the pre-bankruptcy stuff.
  8. MB has nothing to do with it. They recalled under 1,000 cars in 2013 and don't have an image problem. GM has recalled 25 million cars this year, if all of them were 2004-2009 pre bankruptcy cars that would be one thing. But when The Cruze, ATS, CTS, C7 are getting hit with stop sales and recalls that is a problem. Those cars are from the new GM that is supposed to fix the old mess, but it looks like more of the same old GM.
  9. Can GM get any car right? Everything they build has a stop sale or recall. Car and Driver had a long term test Corvette and the engine blew after 6,000 miles.
  10. I'd rather have a diesel GLK.
  11. Wind tunnel and pedestrian impact standards rule all.
  12. Price cut makes sense, the interior on a Viper might be worse than what you get in a Dart. The Corvette interior has always been better than the Viper and the Corvette is cheaper. And there are new sports cars like the Jaguar F-type which have style, the Mercedes AMG GT is coming, old standbys like the 911 are still there. There are a lot of fast cars for $100k that are more of a total package.
  13. I would imagine the 2.0T is the base engine, I would guess $36-38k for base price. An XF starts at $50k, Jaguars aren't priced to be the value leader in the segment. They already confirmed the 340 hp 3.0T for the "S" model and I bet they price that near $50k similar to the C400 pricing. I don't know if they did enough though to price like a Mercedes or BMW and get enough sales to avoid massive discounts to clear them off dealer lots.
  14. The original was ugly, and so is this one. Looks huge too, which sort of defeats the purpose of buying an Aston Martin. The DB5 and DB9 I think are 2 of the best looking cars ever, hard to believe the same people designed this.
  15. The LED light bars seem overdone, every Ford or Kia has them, time to move on to all LED headlights then you can just have daytime running light LEDs. That goes for the entire industry. If people are thinking CTS pricing is ambitious, how is Cadillac going to justify nearly double the price of a CTS for the LTS/large car that is coming. LTS could be in the $80-90k range.
  16. Lexus has the worst performance line of any luxury car maker, well at least for the ones that have a performance line, I guess Lexus is better than Lincoln or Acura. But they basically have the IS-F and some trim packages that amount to wheels and a spoiler and stiffer suspension on their cars. Nice performance line. Then they want to make a GS-F with 500 hp and 380 lb-ft or whatever it will have. 0-60 of 4.5 seconds, but does Lexus realize that is what the E550 and 550i can do? Even the Mercedes C400 has been posting 0-60 times of 4.6-4.9 seconds. The big boys are putting out 500-600 hp and torque, running 0-60 in the 3's now. The GS-F performance numbers are about 10 years behind, in fact they sound like a 2004 BMW M5.
  17. It is a nice looking car, but I think the XF looks better and the F-type is way cooler looking than this. The XE has nice proportions and most of the Jag styling cues, but I don't think it has a lot of wow factor like the F-type does. The interior looks average, granted there are only a couple pictures of it, but the doors look plain as can be, like a slab of vinyl, and the dash and everything looks almost like what a well trimmed Hyundai or Kia might have. I don't see this as much of a threat to the 3-series and C-class. But it is a car Jag needs and it is nice to have a lower priced pathway to get a Jaguar.
  18. And this sort of factual nonsense is continually brushed aside as if insignificant. I will state it again, Cadillac is NOT here to push volume, but still people -clinging to Old World Think- believe Cadillac needs to outsell every competitor or it's 'floundering/failing'… yet no such talk about the A6 or GS, for example. Wonder why the standards are so different for some people?? I think it is because in the case of Audi they have had growing sales, up about 10% per year for what seems like 5 years in a row now. Only 30% of Audi sales are A6 and higher, so 70% of their sales come from A3, A4/A5 and Q5. They are selling well on the bottom end, which if those are younger buyers that trade up could mean Audi has a bright future. If they can't get people to move to A6 and higher then the future isn't so bright, I don't think they'd be in trouble, but they'd always be seen a bit as a 2nd tier brand if they can only sell in that $30-45k range. Lexus GS and LS sales are crap, but they sell so many RX and ES, the overall brand numbers look good. But Lexus has sold a lot of those 2 cars for years, and they haven't been able to get people to trade up to a GS or an LS, in fact LS sales are probably worse now than they were 10 years ago. The IS has been a bright spot for them, sales of that really picked up this year. If the RX and ES sales dropped 20% and the brand got in trouble, people would be saying the GS isn't carrying its weight and make a deal out of it. The problem for Cadillac is they don't have an 8 or 9 vehicle lineup, and the ATS and CTS are 2 of their newest products and both are down. Cadillac needs the ATS and CTS to survive, Lexus could sell zero GS350's and it wouldn't really matter.
  19. Ponchoman is pretty spot on. I agree with what he says. As far as the sales advantage the Germans have with multiple body styles and engines, why isn't Cadillac doing that? It isn't like this is some new strategy they just thought up, there have been 3-series and E-class sedan, coupe, convertible, wagon since the 1980s or early 90s. They have been doing it for 25 years. Lexus has been doing hybrids for 10 years or so, the Germans have been pushing diesels big time for the past 5 years. Cadillac only has to blame themselves for not offering more body styles or engines.
  20. According to CNBC Ford is #1 in customer loyalty at 64% and number 2 is Mercedes at 57.8%. Toyota was in 3rd, BMW and Lexus are in the top 10. Chevy is the only GM brand in the top 10, my guess is the Silverado drives that, just like the F150 drives Ford's number. http://www.cnbc.com/id/101800143/page/10 This year Lexus, BMW, Audi and Mercedes all have 9-16% growth (Lexus leading the way), and Cadillac is down. And even worse is the ATS and CTS which are their new products are down the most. The current strategy isn't working, this is like the CTS-STS-DTS trio of 2006 that wasn't working, so they scrapped 2 of those and put the CTS in a different class. They have the same results with ATS-CTS-XTS. Cadillac marketing is I think worse now than it was 10 years ago, and I don't think they have the money to really go toe to toe with the Germans or Lexus, even though most Lexus product isn't that good considering how much money Toyota spends.
  21. Cadillac ran an average incentive of $7700 last month and their sedan sales are still down. I don't think lower prices are the answer, they are already low. Better product and more importantly better marketing is needed. The thing is Lexus, BMW and Mercedes buyers are loyal, so to get people that spend $60k on a car they need to make something so amazing that those people switch loyalties, or get trade ups form Infiniti, Acura, Lincoln etc. And I suspect the type of people that buy an Acura or Lincoln are never trading up to something expensive.
  22. Problem #1 is the Wreath and Crest (now just the Crest) was neglected and dragged through the mud for too many years. Current buyers probably don't even remember the Cimarron or Allante, but I do think a lot of people have the image of Devilles/DTS that grandpa drives and that is how they see Cadillac. Cadillac has a weaker brand image than Lexus or the 3 Germans. Problem #2 is marketing. Ellinghaus makes a good point that they need to focus on Cadillac's roots and what makes Cadillac Cadillac, and not just compare them to the Germans as they have the past couple years. Other brands are guilty of this too, they run ads like "more standard horsepower than a C300" but who cares their car isn't better than a C300. Notice Mercedes or BMW never talk about other brands in their commercials, they talk about themselves and their brand. Problem #3 is lack of focus. Ellinghaus says they need to focus on roots and being American, but Cadillac admitted to basically tearing apart a 3-series and reverse engineering from that to make the ATS and they copied almost every measurement and dimension. Ellinghaus also says Cadillac's future is RWD, but you have a front wheel drive XTS and SRX, the next gen SRX is confirmed front drive already. So which is it? I don't think Cadillac has a vision of what they want to be, they see the Lexus RX sell well, they think let's copy it, they 3-series and E-class sell well, they think let's copy it. Problem #4 is the CTS itself. They are priced $6,000 below the E-class and you get $3,000 more cash back right now, so price isn't the problem. Styling is subjective, I don't love the front end, but some people might like it, the rear of the CTS looks dull as dirt. Equipment levels need work too, if you get the standard trim, it lacks content, you need the luxury package and then so much of what is on are driver nannies like blind spot monitoring and lane keep assist. Heated/ventilated seats leather seats, rearview camera and HID lights, ambient lighting should be standard even if that means another $1,000 or so added to base price. All the driver nannies go into one package, this is supposed to be a driver's car after all, half the buyers might not care less about radar cruise control and lane keep assist. Performance upgrades like magnetic ride control, bigger brakes, etc go into a package, multimedia or technology upgrades can be a package. There can be a premium package also that has basically what the current premium trim level has, for those that want all the bells and whistles. Makes is easier for the buyer to get what they want.
  23. Honda-Acura, Nissan-Infiniti (but have an alliance with Renault). Ford-Lincoln. I think Toyota could drop Scion and make a Celica, Supra and boxy looking compact SUV off the Yaris platform and get more sales than Scion makes. I think GM has room for a brand in between Chevy and Cadillac, they could do a better job defining the brands and spacing them out though.
  24. Cadillac may be getting an Omega based crossover to go between the SRX and Escalade, so that could fill that void they have. Although one wonders if Omega is supposed to be GM's best platform, why would an Omega SUV be placed below the Escalade which is based on a Silverado? Buick for a while claimed they were targeting Lexus but I don't think they ever really were. I have never thought of Buick as a luxury brand, GM needs to build what is best for Cadillac without worrying what it does to GMC or Buick. You can't compromise Cadillac because you are worrying Buick dealers might lose some sales. Lexus is resurgent this year also, they have sold almost 200,000 cars already.
  25. Cadillac does have a marketing problem and has for a while. They don't have a consistent theme, they jump around year to year, they don't consistently advertise products, they advertise what is new then forget about it for 4 years. They don't really push the attributes of the individual cars or promote the brand name. Cadillac product is getting better, but the Germans are still superior. BMW makes a 45 mpg sedan, Mercedes has a 42 mpg sedan, the diesel C-class should get 45, Cadillac can't come close those numbers. Mercedes E63 AMG S does 0-60 in 3.5 seconds, that is 2015 Corvette Z06 fast. The 2015 C-class doesn't have plastic buttons on the interior, the window switches, fuel release door, power seat adjustments, etc are metal, they raised the bar big time. I bet Cadillac has plastic power seat buttons and fuel filler door release buttons on every model. Cadillac still misses some little details, as well as big things like no hybrids or diesels or convertibles.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search