Jump to content
News
Reviews
Discussons
Activity
Create New...
Close

smk4565

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    13,686

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    11

 Content Type 

Everything posted by smk4565

  1. smk4565
    A 2007 is a borderline 8 year old car now. Most cars at 7 or 8 years old are only going to hold 1/3 of their original value. I have seen 2008 CTS for $15k, so 1/3 what is what new. An S600 has to depreciate because there aren't many people on the used market that can afford to run a V12. Only crazy rich people can pay that kind of cost, and they can afford a new one. The S-class is still the best car in this class, has the most engine options and they have a coupe and soon to have a convertible.
  2. smk4565
    As much as you like to deny it, every time some soccermom spends $40k on an SRX, that is $40k not spend on an equivalent X3. The two do compete.... and the Cadillac wins in sales most of the time. Agreed that they bought something else, so it is a lost potential customer. But it is sort of like if someone buys an Avalon or Impala instead of an Audi A3, they cost the same, but are different in character. Crossover buyers mostly want generic and fwd, that is why the Rav4 and CR-V sell so well. The SRX is Cadillac's best seller because it capitalizes on what crossover buyers want. The Germans are more into cars, and a midsize SUV from them is $10-15,000 more than what it costs at Lincoln, Lexus or Cadillac, for the typical crossover buyer they don't care about driving dynamics or engineering, so the Lexus RX on the Camry platform is perfect for them.
  3. smk4565
    I'd imagine most that can afford this can afford and S65, even though the S63 is quicker 0-60, I'd want an S65 to have the V12. Once you get into this price strata, why wouldn't you get the V12.
  4. smk4565
    Rather weak mileage for a small engine, sort of surprising. Really the 2.0T should be the entry level engine, most of these should be built with a V6, but I don't know if that is what they are doing. They should also drop a diesel in there, my friend has a 535d, and averages 31.7 mpg and he has 413 lb-ft of torque available from 1800 rpm, there is no power lag at all in his car.
  5. smk4565
    The SRX competes with the Lincoln MKX and Lexus RX350 though in the front drive, mid-size crossover arena. Which is a huge segment because the soccer moms want luxury crossovers that drive like the minivan or CamCord they used to have. There is definitely room and opportunity for Alpha based crossovers, I think a rear drive crossover to compete with the X5 and ML is a no brainer, the SRX can stay at the bottom end, Escalade at the top.
  6. smk4565
    I am curious to see what they do with the CTS-V, I'd assume some variant of the Z06 engine. The ATS-V and M3 are going to be seriously out powered by the C63 AMG, although I know power isn't the whole story.
  7. smk4565
    Well the EPA rates the CTS-V lower than the S63 so I was going off that. But Car and Driver in 2 different comparison tests with a CTS-V, one in 2009 and one in 2011 got 11 mpg each time. So if they got 16 mpg on an S63, that is pretty good.
  8. smk4565
    GM builds pickups, SUVs and sedans. No room for hot hatches or any of this Euro nonsense. Next people are going to say they want a convertible that isn't a Corvette or Camaro.
  9. smk4565
    How many above CAFE cars do they have, the 500 and Dart? Maybe the 200 4-clinder? So that is 3 cars to offset all those Jeeps, pickups, V8 Chargers, etc. It seems like the numbers wouldn't add up. But kudos to Dodge for putting an insane amount of power in a production car and not just playing everything safe and listening to the bean counters.
  10. smk4565
    I guy that lived on my street when I was in high school just bought a 1983 Mercdes 300d, he likes it, it has like 250k miles but runs and drives smooth. Chrysler Pacifica can be had for $5-6k if you get one with 125k miles.
  11. smk4565
    Even a lot of $5,000 used cars are like 04 Dodge Ingrepids with 125k miles and are awful. It is tough to find a decent cheap car.
  12. smk4565
    What about a 2002-2005 era Ford Focus, they had a sedan, hatch and wagon of that car, they are under $5,000 and fuel efficient and cheap to repair. There are a lot of Chrysler Sebrings under $5k and Buick Century type cars that are cheap.
  13. smk4565
    Clue was an awesome movie. A mid-engine Corvette is sacrilege! It has to be front engine rear drive, and the Camaro should stay an affordable sports car, with the Corvette still not outrageously priced. Value is part of the Corvette's equation. Make a mid-engine Cadillac supercar if you want one, then you can go all out and price it high and make it more of an exotic car.
  14. smk4565
    A friend of mine sent me a link to the world's hardest car quiz, and I must say it was very hard but a lot of fun also. I got a 72%. It was made in the UK so a few of these questions are more about European cars, or cars sold in Europe at least. http://www.carwow.co.uk/world-hardest-car-quiz
  15. smk4565
    Part of Cadillac's problem is lack of body styles and lack of engine choices also. There needs to be coupe and convertible versions of the ATS and CTS and V-series in a hurry. The new C-class goes on sale in 2 weeks, but in 2015 calendar year they have the AMG version, a diesel and a plug-in hybrid coming, and coupe and convertible I think for 2016 model year. The 3-series has had multiple body styles for 30 years, so this isn't some new surprise, yet Cadillac seems slow to roll out model variants. Cadillac has sold cars in the $40k range for years though, and they seem to be struggling a bit now at it. So what happens with the LTS when they are really going into uncharted territory.
  16. smk4565
    I am not a BMW fan, but the 3-series outsells the ATS like 5 to 1 and ATS sales are down 20% this year. So Cadillac must have missed the mark on something. I don't think Cadillac really understands the luxury market. They copy the 3-series and the Lexus RX, they threw the ELR against the wall to see if it would stick, they figured there are a lot of "traditional" Cadillac buyers so we need an XTS for them, and they got some hits and misses. But overall they don't have a really good plan of attack. Not enough body style and engine choices, not enough focus on brand image, no core value to cling to. The ATS and CTS are supposed to be hardcore sport sedans, then you pair them with FWD soft riding SRX and XTS. What is Cadillac trying to be?
  17. smk4565
    The ELR can't be compared to an R8 or SLS AMG (which is getting replaced next year), because those are high end sports cars, they aren't going to sell they are more there for marketing purpose and engineer exercises. The ELR is a Volt coupe, the engineering was already there and it isn't creating some sports car halo effect that makes Cadillac a cool brand. As far as moving goal posts go, yes they do move and it is BMW and Mercedes who move them. Going back to 1990 when Lexus came out they copied Mercedes, but then Mercedes came out with soft closing doors, double glazed glass, power folding rear headrests, a V12 engine, etc. Then the target moved. Lexus tried to copy the 3-series with the first IS300, but what they really had was a dressed up Toyota Altezza, and when BMW put the twin turbo I-6 in the 3-series the rest of the segment was like 50 hp behind, so the goal post became 300 hp in 2007. The 3-series was so dominant in that class, that even though the 2014 model might not be as good as a 2010 3-series, what BMW builds is still better than what the copy cats have. Mercedes is about to attack the segment from a different angle, but by doing what their core traits are, luxury, engineering, ride quality, etc. The leaders set the goal post, the copy cat brands try to get there, only to find the leader moved it again. Cadillac benchmarked the 3-series for the ATS and bought 3-series and took them apart and tried to build a better mousetrap so to speak, but then you are also benchmarking a BMW of a couple years ago since it takes a few years to develop a car. When Mercedes designs a new S-class, they don't go out and benchmark and A8 or 7-series, the set out to build the best car in the world, they create their own benchmark and set what the new standard will be.
  18. smk4565
    ??? These are 3 letter names--CLA, CLS, SLS, SLR...pay attention. Yes Mercedes is doing a lot more 3 letter names now I guess I didn't realize how many, now that I think of GLK, GLA, CLA. But they pretty much only had C, E, S classes and ML, SL back when the other guys went to alphabet soup names. Lexus clearly has tried to copy Mercedes since the very beginning, but I still think Cadillac, Lincoln and Acura would have been better off sticking with word names rather than going to alphanumeric, I think they lost some of their identities when they did that.
  19. smk4565
    The 3-series may have drifted from the core values, and it does seem a bit big and fat now (as do all BMWs), but the 3-series still has enough of the BMW traits to keep people buying. Steering isn't as good, but they still have BMW suspension and BMW brakes, it is bigger, but they give you more interior room, it is heavier than it was 10 years ago, but they have an 8-speed and turbo inline 6 that is super smooth with great low end torque. BMW still does enough and the 3-series is sort of evolving or aging with its customer base. The ATS can't match the 3-series acceleration, and the ATS can't match the NVH. And the 3-series has a diesel that gets 45 mpg. The C-class is going to put the "luxury" back into luxury sports sedans, they aren't going to copy BMW like Cadillac and Lexus have done, Mercedes is doing what Mercedes does best and I think they are about to stick it to BMW. Cadillac needs to do what Cadillac does best, and not just try to copy the E90 3-series, because people aren't going to buy the copy.
  20. smk4565
    The ELR in May had a 725 day supply on dealership lots, I wouldn't say they are moving. I guess with the big discounts though (and probably them not building any) has got it down to 194 days now. But that is still over 6 months. The CTS has a 215 day inventory supply. BMW and Audi have supplies less than 45 days by comparison. The ELR selling 60 a month or whatever they are getting is what makes it a flop. Had they priced it at $54,000 maybe they could have sold like 250 a month and it wouldn't have been as embarrassing. Either way they should drop the car.
  21. smk4565
    Agreed that the CTS name should have been used on what is now the ATS, people are used to "CTS" being the entry level Cadillac. The STS name could have been brought back to be what is the current CTS. Now you have to convince people to pay $50k for what was an entry level $35k car 5-10 years ago.
  22. smk4565
    I read there are dealers giving $20,000 off to sell ELR's. This car is a flop, the idea of the car itself was bad, to charge $76k for it was a horrible idea. Had they priced it at $55k from the start, maybe they would have sold a few, but this car is tanking faster than the Allante or XLR did.
  23. smk4565
    New C-class goes on sale August 25th though, and Road & Track said the interior is possibly better than any other German car except for the S-class. That could be a game changer in the small luxury segment. But the CTS is mid-size, actually the CTS is one of the biggest cars in the mid-size segment. the current CTS is the same length as the 2005-2010 STS. I would like a back up camera, that is something my car doesn't have that I think is useful. I also could care less about blind spot warning systems, maybe in a big SUV that does have huge blind spots it is useful, but I don't need the side mirrors lighting up every 10 seconds when a car is there. These nanny systems almost encourage distracted driving, although I would be in favor of self driving cars.
  24. smk4565
    Call me crazy, but I found a 2005 Pontiac Aztek with 85k miles for $5,250. It was FWD, 19/26 mpg. The Buick Rendezvous's seem to go for a little bit more. The Aztek would have cargo space, although Pontiac Aztek and reliability probably don't go hand in hand. Chevy HHR and PT Cruiser could be a possibility. Oldsmobile Alero has sort of a contemporary look, so even now they don't look too old or dated.
  25. smk4565
    I thought that too, the connectors for the DVD screens look from the 90s. Why not have a couple holders for integrated iPads or something that would look more slick.
×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

I've whitelisted
Continue without support

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search