Jump to content
News
Reviews
Discussons
Activity
Create New...
Close

smk4565

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    13,726

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    11

 Content Type 

Everything posted by smk4565

  1. smk4565
    Johan said in an interview that the 2.0 turbo 4 would be standard and the 3.6 liter twin turbo optional. Basically the same power trains in the CTS. He did say in the future there would be a twin turbo V8. I'd imagine that is their V-series. Makes you wonder if this is more of an XTS replacement, can't be an S-class fighter with a 4-cylinder. Even the A7 and CLS have boosted sixes and eights, so what is their competitor?
  2. smk4565
    The A6 isn't quite $400,000. I'd like to see Cadillac spend $2 billion on a S-class/Maybach competitor and put their money where Johan's mouth is.
  3. smk4565
    Why would anyone pay $400,000 for a car with a Corvette motor, when they could just buy a Corvette, for 1/6th the price. All these high dollar cars have a V12 for a reason. Cadillac couldn't even compete with the Mercedes SL, I can't see them pulling off a super car.
  4. smk4565
    That basically looks the same as an XTS or CTS, although with a cleaner appearance and more appropriate front end styling. The CTS LED light bars look a bit over the top and tacky. It looks like a Cadillac should, but it isn't exciting, it just looks sort of slab sided and boring. I guess we are still waiting for the next car to come to really compete with the Germans, and this is just a stop gap replacement to the XTS until it arrives. What is with the Dare Greatly campaign? Another new slogan? Every 2 years they change, BMW has had the same one for like 40 years. Props though for using the kick music from Inception, but that song in French is "I regret nothing" and I am pretty sure they regret the Cimarron.
  5. smk4565
    I'd like to see Cadillac go after Rolls-Royce with a Covette/Silverado engine and see what happens. Or Maybe Cadillac can build a Lamborghini Aventador or Ferrari F12 competitor with a Covette motor. I think people would pay $400,000 for a Cadillac with the same engine in a $60,000 Corvette.
  6. smk4565
    Yes, because Billionaires care about depreciation or gas mileage or operating costs. Not sure where you could even find one used.
  7. smk4565
    Close to 10,000 lbs with armor, a V12 is needed. A V8 in this car would be like a 2.0T in an Escalade ESV Platinum. WRONG! It is a little small 6 liter V12, The GM 6.2L V8 would do a better job than this engine with better gas mileage. Again you are hung up on the badge and not the real facts. That V8 could not produce the NVH standards needed buy a car like this. They Maybach cars don't use Mercedes most powerful engine for a reason, they need smoothness and quietness. The Mercedes-AMG V12 makes 811 lb-ft of torque, but the computer limits it to 738 lb-ft to protect the transmission and reduce wheel spin.
  8. smk4565
    EV2
  9. smk4565
    This thing is about as big as a railroad car. It is 3 feet longer than a Suburban. They will sell every one of these they build I am sure, and probably at $1 million a pop. And they have made previous versions of the Pullman and 6 door limos, I think this is just a better execution of it than what they did on the W140 and W220 chassis. Close to 10,000 lbs with armor, a V12 is needed. A V8 in this car would be like a 2.0T in an Escalade ESV Platinum.
  10. smk4565
    The original Pullman came out in 1965, so Mercedes has had that name for a good while now. I read elsewhere that this car was designed specifically for "governments, rulers, and royal families." So in other words, dictators and monarchs. Clearly the best option is the possibly $500,000 upgrade for the VR9 ballistic protection, which let's be honest, the majority of people that buy this car are getting the armored version. Also important to note that this car has a rear cabin speedometer, so that El Presidente can yell at Jeeves for driving too fast, or perhaps to make sure that Jeeves is traveling at a high enough speed to run over the ifedels.
  11. smk4565
    I mostly agree with Z06, the two clowns are going to try and fix Cadillac with naming schemes, the move to NY and a bunch of PR spin. Marketing and Facebook posts aren't going to turn Cadillac around, product will. These two guys aren't car engineers or designers. The Escalade is the only thing keeping Cadillac alive right now, maybe Alpha-numeric names are not such a good idea.
  12. smk4565
    This guy is all talk, and little action. Cadillac has talked about renaissances multiple times, and after 10 years they aren't really in any better shape than they were in 2005. We'll see what he comes up with, but he even mentions how they will have a consistent naming nomenclature for their products, but then the Escalade which is their most recognizable produce is excluded from that naming system. That makes no sense. Johan was in charge of Audi of America, but Audi perfoms better everywhere else in the world, and he did nothing with Infiniti. If he couldn't tackle BMW and Benz with VW's resources, couldn't do it with Nissan's, I don't see why it will be any different at GM. Granted Cadillac I think is a better brand name than Infiniti, there is a bit more potential there, but why there wasn't a GT-R powertrain Infiniti sedan to take on the M5 just shows how clueless Johan is.
  13. smk4565
    That is a bad move, they are a luxury car maker, not a sports car or SUV maker. Pretty much guarantees now that there will be a Maybach GL600 to compete.
  14. smk4565
    Cadillac interiors need work, I sat in a CTS V-sport and XTS V-sport the other day, and they are Lexus GS level. They aren't up to Audi A6/A7 levels, they aren't even at C300 level, the whole center stack in a Cadillac feels like it came out of a Volt or Ford Edge with those weird, black touch button controls. The performance specs on this car seem pretty good, but you wonder if it will really hit a 3.8 0-60 time, because that quicker than a Corvette with more weight and not quite the power.
  15. smk4565
    S-class has been the best car in the world for the past 30 years. I don't think the best in the world can be overrated. Few cars have had that long a run at the top of their class, 3-series is probably the only other one. The Phaeton can't even compete with the A8, there is no point in VW making it. They should put those resources into the Jetta and Passat and get them more competitive.
  16. smk4565
    Priced where you'd expect, but it seems way higher than the base ATS. I still think they need to drop that 2.5 liter base model. I figure the CTS-V will be around $85k base, this way they still undercut the Germans but are moving the price point up. I wonder how many they'll sell though, the ATS isn't really a hot item as it is, to me this car will be like the IS-F and fairly rare.
  17. smk4565
    That has always been a weak spot for Cadillac, not enough body styles, and not enough engine choices. Not like it is hard to add a diesel or hybrid to an existing model. Lexus launches most models with a hybrid right away. Cadillac needs to learn how to move faster, especially if they are going to add more products, because then you need to mid-cylce refresh 8 or 9 vehicles, not just the 5 they have now.
  18. smk4565
    The Quatroporte and XJ are barely competing. Really they should just give up. Since the A8 platform gets used for Bentley too, they might as well take the $737 million for the Phaeton and put it into the A8, maybe they can sort of catch up to the S-class. Because now Mercedes is coming for Bentley too with the Maybach S600. VW should have a $30-40k sedan above the Passat as their Maxima/Avalon competitor, sort of a poor man's Audi A6 I guess.
  19. smk4565
    I'd agree with that. Cadillac's advertising is fairly week, espeically on the ATS and CTS and what are supposedly the future of the brand.
  20. smk4565
    No point to this car, they need to let it die already. They thin a VW can compete with an S-class? That is a waste of $737 million. They could make it compete with the Equus or K900, but that isn't enough sales volume, and no point to do that. If someone wants a $75k luxury car from VW, they can buy an A8. The other problem is a Passat starts at $22k and then the Phaeton is one step up at $75k? A $50k price difference and they look the same! I think VW could use a sedan larger than the Passat, priced in the $33-43k range, as more of an Azera, Maxima, Impala and LaCrosse competitor. But by no means should they make a $75k sedan. That would be like Chevy making a $75k full size luxury sedan to compete with Cadillac.
  21. smk4565
    There are 2 nice things about a self driving car, it takes stress away from the driver, and you could read a book, watch a tv show on your tablet or work on your laptop while the car drives you somewhere. The other nice thing would be on a long car trip, you could go to sleep for a couple hours and perhaps arrive at your destination. But for those to happen you need a level of autonomy like KITT in Knight Rider, where the car could almost think for itself. Personally I would still rather drive myself, with the exception being a long high way drive where the car could drive overnight while the driver slept.
  22. smk4565
    #2 Mustang #4 Jaguar as they made motorcycle side cars before they made cars, but I guess they never made cars and bikes at the same time #5 Riviera I don't know the others.
  23. smk4565
    Cadillac and Buick are getting a bit more individual attention as of late. I think GM is trying to make it more about those brands and what they are doing to strengthen them. Which has to be done, because I think people buy the brand more than anything when they buy a car. Pickups are a good example, there are Ford guys and Chevy guys, and not many people could care less about the brand and just buy based on appearance or horsepower. I think a big mistake GM did back in 2005 or 2006 was when they put those Silver GM badges on every car to show how these are all made by GM. People don't buy a corporation, they buy a brand name. That is why they don't sell Proctor and Gamble toothpaste.
  24. smk4565
    But the other cars with NA V6s are Lincoln, Acura, Lexus and Infiniti. And look how dated that Lexus 3.5 liter V6 with 306 hp looks, that engine came out around 2007. The Infiniti V6 still has high rev power to it, but is low on torque, and that engine has been around forever too.
  25. smk4565
    It is a massive amount of torque, it might beat that 0-60 in 5.9 seconds estimate, because the C400 can do 0-60 in 4.8 seconds with the V6. For me I'd have to see the performance data and fuel costs and pricing of the C350 plug in and compare to the C400 V6, or ATS V6 or 335i or other near $50k cars.
×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

I've whitelisted
Continue without support

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search