Jump to content
Create New...

smk4565

Members
  • Posts

    13,686
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    11

Everything posted by smk4565

  1. Maybe they'll put a 700 hp Ferrari V12 in it, and it will weigh 2,500 lbs, cost $40,000 and go 0-60 in 2.5 seconds.
  2. There is a whole lot of "grow in size" going on with their lineup.
  3. Can't put a V8 in a car that small. Remember the Miata is 1,000 lbs lighter than a Corvette. Even if a V8 fit under the hood, which I'd doubt it does, then the weight would have to go way up, the price would go way up, because you need bigger brakes, bigger transmission, structural enhancements, etc. Interestingly enough, the Hemi V8 doesn't even fit in the Viper.
  4. It is possible of course, I was being a bit sarcastic about CAFE, but that is often a reason as to why they don't do things. GM sells 500,000 pickups that get poor mileage, yet they can't put a V8 in a Cadillac (other than CTS-V) because of CAFE. But then what about a Buick GNX, a Cadillac XT5 V-series, an Escalade V-series, an Impala SS, etc. You can't really build a business case for all these variants, and you probably can't even put 400 hp into a Terrain or similar FWD crossover. They could put a Corvette engine into a Colorado, but then what would that cost, like $50,000+ ? Does anyone want a $50,000 Colorado? And doesn't that steal thunder from the Silverado, their real cash cow?
  5. Oh yeah, Chrysler quality was industry leading when they were owned by Cerebus. And the Dart, Cherokee, Renegade and 200 are on Fiat platforms, the Ram and Jeep V6 turbodiesel is because of Fiat. I think FCA is a bit of a mess as well, but Chrysler would be out of business right now with Fiat. And Fiat might be out of business by now without Chrysler, somehow they are keeping each other alive.
  6. I think it should play the Spaceballs clip when you put it into ludicrous mode. I'd like to see the Model S in ludicrous mode drag race an Aventador or GT-R.
  7. Buick Envision is 183.7 inches long on the D2XX platform, I bet the Equinox moves to that, I think the size could even drop to 180 inches, which is still longer than an Escape or CR-V. The C1XX platform short wheelbase will be XT5, and new Chevy, and the current Lambda trio moves to long wheelbase C1XX. Question is does the GMC Terrain move to D2XX or C1XX? Or does GMC bring back the Envoy as their C1XX, while Terrain goes to D2XX. Personally I think if Buick is going to have Gamma and D2 crossovers, GMC should get a short wheelbase C1 crossover, while Buick does not, to try to reduce overlap in the showroom.
  8. Who cares about quality, it will have passion and soul because it is Italian. I think Fiat needs more models, obviously they need a 500L convertible, a 500X 4-door crossover coupe Abarth and a 500L-XL that is a long wheelbase, 3 row 500L, better make a coupe version of that too.
  9. If you want a roomy 3rd row buy this: Most of these crossovers never have anybody in the back seat anyway. They probably could get a small 3rd row into a mid-size SUV, but then who needs a Traverse or Tahoe, when the mid-size SUV has 3 rows.
  10. Equinox will become Cruze based, share the 1.5 liter turbo as the base, maybe the Malibu's 2.0 turbo optional. This could be 180 inches long, in line with an Escape and CR-V. I smell a Trailblazer return for a real mid-size (around 191 inches long) 5-seat crossover.
  11. CAFE says NO! to a GMC Cyclone or Typhoon. I would like to see a Riviera, but won't it have to have a base 2.5 liter 4-cylinder as not to upstage the ATS? Unless they finally drop that engine from the ATS, then the Riviera can have a 2.0T. I think the 3.6 V6 would be good for the Riviera, I see that as appealing to an older buyer that wants a smooth cruiser, and is probably not interested in a 4-cylinder.
  12. The CLS does look good, in either generation. But it was also the original, and they have an E-class as a sedan so they can make the CLS dramatic. What I hate is stuff like the Chrysler 200 every run of the mill family sedan trying to look like a 4-door coupe, but they still want to be a sedan. And 4-door crossover coupes are the worst, I saw a BMW X4 today, what a ugly vehicle. Go buy a 3-series sedan if you want a 4-door BMW.
  13. RWD doesn't hurt gas mileage or CAFE. Weight, aerodynamics, gearing, engine efficiency etc. Hurt or help fuel economy. Case in point by looking at four common 6-cylinders: RWD BMW 335i gets 21/32 mpg FWD Camry gets 21/21 mpg RWD Charger gets 19/31 mpg FWD Impala gets 18/28 mpg I think What GM is planning is a car and crossover off Gamma and Delta, use Epsilon for middle and full size sedan, Lambda for middle and large crossover. So Chevy gets 8 products out of 4 platforms.
  14. Right now a Trax is $20k, an Equinox $22k, and Traverse $31k. Downsizing the Equinox I think would make sense, it is bigger than a Rav4 or CR-V. They could still charge $22k, but that makes the Equinox and Trax really close in rise and price then. Then you have a 5 seat Equinox at $22k, and a 5 seat short Traverse for $27k? They are jamming a lot in close together. I'm sure a new middle crossover will sell well, but will probably cannibalize a lot of sales out of the Equinox and Traverse.
  15. I hope they get a crossover coupe. Those are even better than 4-door coupes!
  16. Perhaps more of a brakes, suspension tuning and appearance package is available. But no new engine. A way to get V-sport looks without the twin turbo motor.
  17. Easier to make the Buick Malibu the new LaCrosse at $32k, and a Park Avenue at $39k, than to push the LaCrosse up there. CTS didn't do so great going from 3-series price to 5-series price. The current Regal/Insignia is probably short lived, I imagine Buick is going to go to a 3 car line up based off Cruze, Malibu, Impala, and a 3 CUV lineup based on Trax, Equinox and Traverse as these platforms all get streamlined. Unless the Buick Malibu is going to be $27k and the Buick Impala $31k again, to keep the Buick price premium over a Chevy at $4,000. I see larger sedans as a dying breed though, a $33k mid-size (193 inch long) sedan would match up really well against Cadenza, Avalon, MKZ, and ES350.
  18. I still think the full size Buick (ie the Buick Impala) should be a Park Avenue, not a LaCrosse. I think you would have an easier time with a $38k base price on a Park Avenue, rather than a LaCrosse, because the LaCrosse is like $31k now, they have to get it farther away from the Impala, and when the XTS dies, Buick can sort of fill the void.
  19. On second thought, I would rename the Verano to Regal, and keep the LaCrosse name for the 193 inch long car. The Regal name has heritage, and dopes will think they are getting what used to be a $30k Regal for just $25k and will think it is great value. But in reality, the Regal will just be a fancy Cruze.
  20. What about 500 hp V8 in a small CUV? It's coming.
  21. Buick needs a Riviera, the brand is boring. A 2-door a bit bigger than Camaro, turbo 4 and V6 engines, maybe like $35-45k price range, that could be a nice personal luxury coupe, problem is the pricing is pretty close to ATS coupe, but if you keep the focus on luxury, and not performance, you can differentiate and keep the price down. I also think the XTS should die, and become a Park Avenue, at a $40,000 price point (only $5,000 less than XTS, decontent it a bit). Make the next Verano (which I assume will grow in size as all cars do) $25,000 base, and then you merge Regal and LaCrosse into one car ( I don't care what name they use) at like 193 inches long, $32,000 base. Then you have a 3 sedan lineup that is about $8,000 more than the Chevy counterparts. You get the XTS out of Cadillac so they can be upscalde Cadillac, not "traditional" Cadillac. And you keep Buick's focus on quite luxury, 200-300 hp engines, you aren't building a sports car, you are going after people that bought CamCords, Rav4s and CR-V's in the past that are happy with mediocre performance but want a smooth ride and luxury and some technology that is better than what a Chevy/Ford would have.
  22. The old Rogue was pretty small, I was behind a new one the other day and it seemed like a midsize, it just looked big.
  23. Wasn't the Malibu "the car you can't ignore?" And that was forgettable and people ignored it. I just prefer ads that are brand image focused or product attribute focused. Lexus back in the 90s had the ad with the wine glasses stacked on the LS400 and that nailed both how smooth the car was, and how Lexus brand was about precision engineering. I think Dodge does a pretty good job now trying to craft out a brand image of classic American, and performance.
  24. The current Rogue does look sort of big, looks more midsize than small anyway. So I can see need for a smaller one because of the CX-3, HRV, Trax, etc.
  25. It better not be really expensive. I don't get how Toyota, maybe the largest car company in the world, has so much trouble building and marketing sports cars. There hasn't been a sporty Toyota in like 15 years, and that was the entry level Celica. Pretty sad that they make zero fun to drive cars, and even with Lexus, their sporty cars are a far cry from the Europeans.
×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search