
smk4565
Members-
Posts
13,743 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
11
Content Type
Forums
Articles
Garage
Gallery
Events
Store
Collections
Everything posted by smk4565
-
3 mechanical locking diffs would be better, but for what these will probably be used for the off road stuff they put in them will probably suffice. These engines are getting dated, the Jeep inline six is 420 or 510 hp, I have to imagine that ends up in the Ram next year as the Hemi’s days are numbered. The Tundra hybrid has a big power advantage over the GM 6.2 liter as well. I don’t know if GM plans to do anything with these powertrains or just let them die on the vine and put 100% of what they have into EV’s.
-
This car looks better then the EQS and it is more aerodynamic so you can have style and aero both. I think this is a great engineering exercise and this tech will be a nice upgrade over anything in the market now. Question is how commercially viable is this stuff, anything from an F1 car is expensive as hell, carbon fiber is expensive. This is probably like a $250,000 C-class EV, but I think this car styling wise will lead to the EQ c-class.
-
Maybe the OEMs will catch up. But Tesla sold 110,000 cars in the USA in Q1, Ford sold 6,700 Mach-E's, Kia 5,281 EV6 and Hyundai 2700 Ionic 5, VW with 2755 id4's. They aren't really threatening Tesla at all. Although I think for Tesla to hit 20% share, they can't have their cheapest Crossover be $64,000 and their base model a $48,000 rear drive sedan, because the snow belt will want AWD, and an AWD Model 3 is like $55k. They will have to come out with an entry level model to get market share.
-
Compared to this sea of monotone GM plastic, the BMW was better, although I am sure a 5-series cost more.
-
It isn't as good as an E-class of the era, W124 or W210, but was still better built than a Buick and it had real wood trim, not plastic wood like a 90s Park Ave. I am not saying the 1995 5-series was anything great, the E39 made improvements all around, but Cadillac, Lincoln and Lexus all abandoned what they used to do to chase the E39, the G35 arrived to battle the 3-series. That justified the BMW as the benchmark car and in part caused the market shift. And then they all gave up and went on to make front wheel drive crossovers and "American Luxury" basically died in the process, except in the Escalade which is big and plush and tacky/gawdy, in the vein of a 60-70s Cadillac and that is the only American luxury car that sells.
-
I think body style/vehicle type and size is where you start, then price point for comparisons. The Honda Accord and E-class are the same size, but not competitors due to price. I wouldn’t say the A4 and Riviera were competition as one is 2 door and they almost 2 feet in length apart. As far as the BMW goes, it was built with quality where as the Riviera for example had acres of GM plastic in it. And the BMW could handle. In actuality, it is Cadillac, Infiniti, Lexus, Jaguar and maybe some others that made BMW and Mercedes the bench mark. Mercedes and BMW haven’t really changed in 40 years other than it is SUVs instead of sedans and sedans instead of coupes. It is cars like the Gen 1 CTS, Lincoln LS, Infiniti G37, Lexus GS300, etc that made BMW the benchmark because they were telling consumers a BMW-like car is what luxury is, and now all those cars are gone because people just kept buying BMWs.
-
I think that would have to be a merger as GM isn’t big enough or cash rich enough to buy Honda or a large stake. And I doubt the culture of the two would work so probably wouldn’t be a great merger. Although some of these car companies may merge just to survive Tesla and the Chinese brands once they start exporting.
-
Toyotas run forever, I am sure the Corolla GR will be reliable.
-
They aren't stealing from Tesla, Tesla had it's best year ever in 2021, Q1 of 2022 was better than last year. Currently their sales are still climbing. And yes Toyota and the others will move customers from gas to EV. Suppose Toyota sells 10% of their total volume in EVs, that is over 900,000 EVs. They aren't going to do that this year, but what if they are at 10% in 2025 and 30% in 2030, then were are talking like 3 million EV's a year, and if they are all EV in 2040, we are talking about 10 million EV's. I don't know if Tesla becomes a 10 million unit per year car company, maybe they do, but when everyone has EV's, Tesla's novelty will wear off some.
-
Probably because a Corolla hybrid is $23,750 starting price and gets 52 mpg, it is looks better, is probably roomier, sort of makes the Prius pointless. And they have that 300 hp Corolla coming, that will add some spice to the line up.
-
Still nicer than a Model S, and I suspect the 580 will outsell the 450.
-
Brand loyalty is important, but Tesla has sold maybe 4 million cars in their history, Toyota has sold hundreds of millions. Toyota can roll out that electric SUV and have the 10 million RAV4 owners that are out there come in for it. It is an easy conversion for them. Tesla is mostly going after people that never had a Tesla, never had an EV. And they have done a great job of that, but they have been the only game in town. Today Ford, Hyundai, Porsche and Mercedes have 1 real EV, there are the Kona and Niro EV compliance cars, GM. has the Bolt which isn't really being produced and the low volume Hummer. What happens when those companies have 10-20 EV's each and not 1-2? Then we'll see how good Tesla is.
-
Why does it matter that Tesla sold more EV's than Mercedes, Porsche, GM, Ford, Toyota and Audi combined? EV's are not even 3% of global car sales, there is a lot of market space for other car companies to exploit, Tesla has 2 sedans and 2 crossovers. What about people that want a pickup, a van, a full size sedan/SUV, a compact car/suv, an off roader, a coupe, a convertible, etc. And these big OEMs, like Toyota, Ford, VW, GM probably each have 100-150 million current owners worldwide, huge customer bases to pull from, where as Tesla is basically having to always look for first time buyers to their brand, or pull from the maybe 4 million or so current Tesla owners out there. That Taycan outsold the Model S/X combined. So it is possible to beat Tesla, Porsche just did it right out of the gate. Let's see what happens when the Model 3 and Y get direct competition.
-
But that doesn't matter because there is no law (so far) that says you can't sell gasoline powered cars. Mercedes outsells Tesla overall, once Mercedes converts their line to EV, I would expect them to outsell them still. Tesla sold 24,390 Model S/X combined in 2021 (down 56%). Porsche sold 41,296 Taycan in 2021. First full year on market and they beat Tesla easily head to head. Q1 in 2022 Tesla sold 15k Model S/X, so if they can keep that pace up it gives them 60k, but that is a sedan and SUV, if Porsche adds an electric SUV, I am sure an SUV and Taycan combined can top 60,000 a year. And Mercedes can sell over 60k combined EQS sedan and SUV per year. And if they can beat the Model S/X, why can't they do the same against the 3/Y? They are going to have to build the Cybertruck, full size pickups are too big a market and there is a lot of profit margin in them. And secondly, off roader vehicles are hot right now, they can't build Wranglers, Broncos and 4Runners fast enough, and since that style vehicle is in demand, and there aren't 47 of them like there are FWD crossovers, there is good profit margin in them too. Cybertruck checks both boxes, full size truck segment and off road/overlander segment, it is just a no brainer.
-
The Mach E is nearly $20k cheaper than the Model Y, which good for it, because the Model Y is over priced. But the Mach-E sales were down 47% in February while the Ford brand overall was down 20%. I don't know if that is supply chain or just buyers not showing up, but it is the 2nd worst selling Ford after the Transit Connect, and sales down twice as much as the rest of the brand. You'd think they would put their supply chain into the Mach-E over the Edge or Escape or something. Ford isn't pricing their EV like Tesla now, nor should they, even with the discount it isn't making a big dent. GM looks to be the one that could get it right if they are way under Tesla in Price, the Equinox EV is half the cost of a Model Y if GM can deliver on that, and I assume the Equinox won't be as good, but it doesn't have to be, it just have to be the best EV out there for $30k+ which right now there is pretty much wide open market space and the cost of most gas crossovers. AMG's are niche cars too. It is 10% of Mercedes volume. He stated the Riven was a league of it's own. If that's true, Rivian should be able to take out the F150. But we all know it won't because EV's are a tiny part of the market, and by the time the masses want EVs, or when 100% of vehicles are EV's, the F150 will be EV and do anything the Rivian does and probably at a lower cost with an actual dealer network.
-
Doesn't matter. They are both selling cars, the powertrain behind them is irrelevant. It is like saying Toyota sells more hybrids than Ford, it doesn't matter, what matters is how many cars are they selling and how much money are they making. EV's are 2.5% of the global car market. Tesla dominates 2.5% of the market and doesn't participate in the other 97.5%.
-
Mercedes has Level 3 autonomous driving, while Tesla does not. Consumer Reports also stated that buyers are paying $30-50k over sticker for the EQS, the dealer mark ups are pretty big on them and people are still buying. There is no sitting on lots. When does the Rivian outsell the F150? If it is so fantastic, it should become the #1 selling pickup in the USA.
-
Why not Mercedes? In 2024 they will have more EV models for sale than Tesla, and Mercedes has brand name too. Mercedes outsells Tesla 2 to 1 right now world wide. Tesla had $54 billion in revenue last year with $5.5 billion in profit. Mercedes-Benz had revenue of $185 billion and profit of $25 billion, although $13 billion of that is from splitting off the truck division. The problem GM and Ford have is you can't price a Chevy or Ford SUV against a Tesla, no one is paying Tesla money for a Chevrolet crossover, when current Chevy crossover sales are tanking, Buick sales down 58% in Q1, probably supply chain issues, but if there was demand for those, GM would allocate resources there, and they obviously didn't. Where the opportunity exists is the Tesla Model Y has a base price of $63k and the Model 3 at $47k. There are a lot of customers who want an electric car and can't afford $47k or $63k, there is a massive untapped market that GM can hit with their $30k EV-quinox and their maybe $45k Blazer EV. Lots of white space under $50k price point for EV's. Then the question is does GM take over this space, or does Toyota, Hyundai, Kia get in there and gain ground, or does a Chinese car company come in.
-
I think GM has a chance to do well in EV, if they can deliver on things like the Equinox EV and other vehicles that are more affordable than Tesla's. The Hummer gets like a 40 MPGe, it is grossly inefficient for an EV, but it is a niche vehicle, so it doesn't really matter, it will have a small market of buyers but a that price point will turn profit. The Bolt is a weak seller, that is going to do any damage on the sales chart. The Bolt was down 96% in Q1 this year, they aren't even building them because they catch fire. If GM goes right at Tesla, they are screwed. But if they go where Tesla isn't then I think GM can gain some traction. I am less optimistic about Ford, because The Mach-E was aimed at the Model Y, it priced cheaper and still gets outsold by the Tesla. And the Mach-E trying to be performance SUV is a niche thing. Ford has to put out electric Escpape and Explorer type SUVs that can deliver on cargo space, fit adults and have a decent price. Ford is quite strong in pick up trucks and vans, especially with commercial buyers. But Ford's SUV business has been declining as Toyota, Honda, Hyundai, Kia and Subaru have grown in the past 10-20 years.
-
I don’t think a matter of months is that important. The Lyric goes on sale this spring, the EQS SUV this summer and they have EQB SUV later this year in the US (already on sale in Europe) and the EQE SUV which is the Lyric competition next year. That’s 5 EV’s within the next year, 3 are SUV, and more coming after that. Audi has 2 electric EV’s now plus sport back versions of both, if you can get one since their supply chain is way messed up. What matters is how fast these companies can bring new product and if they can actually keep their production line running.