Jump to content
News
Reviews
Discussons
Activity
Create New...
Close

smk4565

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    13,726

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    11

 Content Type 

Everything posted by smk4565

  1. smk4565
    I am not saying badge job a Mustang. The Mustang is bigger than a 3-series though. Mustang has a 107 inch wheelbase, are Ford engineers not smart enough to put a 3-4 inch stretch on that wheel base to make it 110 inch and make a small rear drive sedan that is a 185 inches long? Engines are no problem you have the 2.3 turbo 4 that Lincoln already uses, you could use the 2.7 turbo V6. Lincoln's problem is everything they make is a Ford chassis and they even share some body panels and hard points on the interior. How about Lincoln create a car from scratch?
  2. smk4565
    The door slabs seem really high, there is hardly any glass to the side windows. Although that is plaguing many cars now. I can't wait to see what the 2018 Audis look like, so I know what Lincoln's new design language will be for 2020.
  3. smk4565
    You could argue that the last good Lincoln was made in 1963. I'd listen to that argument that the Continental Mark V was a good looking car. Jock Ewing had one after all. Since 1980 Lincoln has pretty much been making lackluster product.
  4. smk4565
    XT1 on Gamma, XT3 on Delta and XT7 on the next gen Lambda platform. Clone all those Chevy and Buick crossovers into Cadillacs so they can be like Lincoln. Sounds like a viable plan.
  5. smk4565
    Agreed on 2 new products by 2020. Some luxury makers put out 2-3 new products per year. I bet one of the new products is a Lincon version of the Explorer. That will be the the 3 row crossover bigger than MKX. Then Lincoln will have an Escape, Edge, Explorer and Navigator clone. Which will help with their mission to distance themselves from Ford. The 2nd product I bet is a Focus based Lincoln sedan that they will try to call a 3-series competitor. When you look at luxury market sales, 3-series is by far the #1 seller, C-class and Lexus IS are up there too. Still shocked as to why there isn't a rear drive Lincoln using the Mustang platform.
  6. smk4565
    I'd rather try to market a 4-cylinder and electric hybrid in a $35,000 pick up than a $90,000 performance-luxury sedan. Plus if you figure the take rate on the plug-in hybrid rate of either product might be 5%. Even if 5% of Silverado buyers pick the hybrid, that is 30,000 units a year. If 5% of CT6 buyers take the hybrid that might be 500 cars a year. You aren't getting much return on investment out of 500 units. If you scale it to 50,000 vehicles of year, you drive the cost down.
  7. smk4565
    CAFE is stupid because it factors in footprint. They should remove that out of the equation and go strictly on miles per gallon, regardless of vehicle size. That would force auto makers to make all vehicles more efficient and demand for pickups and SUVs is huge. If people want a pick-up bad enough they will pay an extra $5,000 for it. And manufacturers will also cut margins on pick ups to keep the volume up. Just as they have cut margins on family sedans due to competition. If the CT6 can get 65 mpg-e, I don't see why the same technology couldn't yield 40 mpg-e on a Silverado or Escalade, and near 30 on gas-hybrid combo.
  8. smk4565
    Even that new MKZ has a ton of plastic on the dash, you can tell it is a Fusion underneath. A 400 hp twin turbo V6 is great, but without a rear drive chassis it is wasted.
  9. smk4565
    You could argue that top to bottom, Mazda has the best car line up of any manufacturer. There isn't a bad or dated product in their entire line up. It is too bad more people don't buy their cars, because the 3 is probably the best in the compact segment, the 6 probably the best mid-sizer. And this CX-9 looks well done also.
  10. smk4565
    I think it is a pretty good refresh. New powertrains and updated styling and interior. Some refreshes they barely do anything, Ford did a lot for it just being a mid-cycle refresh. But surprisingly (or maybe not) this is the #2 selling Ford behind the F150, so obviously they are going to keep it competitive.
  11. smk4565
    I like the Miata more. I don't think the Fiat really looks all that good, and it doesn't really scream Fiat to me other than the grille opening. But they need product to keep the dealerships open.
  12. smk4565
    Well obviously they won't be making a diesel now.
  13. smk4565
    The reason it wouldn't, in my opinion, is to push the technology out there to more people and then the little better CAFE score if they sell more as well. As small of a bump it would be...a better score is a better score. Which imagine the CAFE help if it was applied to SUVs and trucks. Rather than a low volume Cadillac. They could put a 15 mpg V12 in the CT6 as the base engine and sell it for $60k, they'd still only sell 3% the volume of what the Silverado sells. Cadillac shouldn't have to pay the CAFE piper at GM, let Chevy do that.
  14. smk4565
    If it is more than the 3.0TT it won't sell. Luxury buyers are going to want performance and smooth power delivery over fuel savings. So you are asking buyers to pay more money for less horsepower to get fuel savings. It won't work. If you price it the same as a 3.0TT, then at least you offer the choice or power or economy at the same price. I know there is battery cost, but a 2.0T engine you can find in $25k cars, it can't cost that much to make one of those. This is why I think this technology is better on a Silverado or Escalade that might only get 18 mpg, you can push it to 30 mpg, which is a huge fuel savings.
  15. smk4565
    The 2-mode hybrid Silverados and Tahoes didn't add enough mpg because it was still a V8 (and batteries are getting batter). By switching out a 5.3 liter V8 with a 2.0T 4-cylinder and electric model you could probably cut fuel consumption in half. And the highest margin vehicles GM makes are Escalade, Tahoe, and Silverado and the GMC counterparts. So you can hide the cost better in those. Plus it is a vehicle that could use the fuel economy push. You could push the Silverado to 30 mpg, to me that makes more sense than something like a Malibu hybrid when the Malibu is lower margin and already gets decent fuel economy.
  16. smk4565
    GM should put the plug-in hybrid into the Silverado. 335 hp/432 lb-ft is more than the 5.3 liter V8 makes. There is obviously space for batteries and weight isn't a concern. All these car makers want to introduce hybrids and electrics, but the biggest gas guzzlers are the best sellers. This is why CAFE makes no sense also. Companies make a 40 mpg car that they lose money on to offset a 15 mpg truck they make profit on. Look at GM's best sellers, 600,000 pick ups a year, 350,000 Lambdas and Tahoes/Yukons a year. Almost a million units of trucks that average 20 mpg at best. Why not put the plug in technology there and reap the impact.
  17. smk4565
    I think the interior looks good. It is clean and simple, not overly tacky or loaded with buttons like some Acuras. I think the interior is the strong point of this car, it looks better than the Azera or Cadenza or Avalon.
  18. smk4565
    How many vehicles have start/stop, cylinder deactivation, AND 8-speeds or more? I'll wait, it's a super short list. Start/stop and cylinder cutoff have been around a while. I think every BMW has had start/stop and an 8 speed the past 3 years. Lexus had an 8-speed transmission 9 years ago. I also heard a Ford engineer say that start/stop gave about a 5% gain in city fuel economy. So that is going from 20 to 21 mpg. Not a deal breaker for most people. I think a 300 hp V6 with start/stop, 8 speed auto, 22/31 mpg is what is expected in a $35,000 car. The Chrysler 300 had 300 hp and 31 mpg and an 8 speed n 2012. That is just what is expected of the segment. I think the Lacrosse engine is what the buyers want and expect. That's not what I asked. Here it is again: How many vehicles have start/stop, cylinder deactivation, AND 8-speeds or more? In other words: what vehicles feature all three of those technologies? Not many because most manufacturers don't use cylinder deactivation. The more common path is smaller displacement with turbos. Personally I don't even like start/stop, I turn it off when I get in a car that has it. You can cherry pick 3 attributes from any car to say why don't others have it. I think it is good that the LaCrosse has an 8 speed, since cars like the 300 have 8 speeds, Acura and Chrysler 200 have 9 speeds. This is where the market has gone. I like that they used a V6 in the LaCrosse either, I think it fits the car better than a highly boosted turbo 4. I don't think fuel economy matters a whole lot to most buyers. Look at sales of pick ups, SUVs, crossovers, etc. Cars win in handling, braking, ride, acceleration and fuel economy and still get outsold by the trucks. People will trade that fuel economy away because gas is cheap here.
  19. smk4565
    How many vehicles have start/stop, cylinder deactivation, AND 8-speeds or more? I'll wait, it's a super short list. Start/stop and cylinder cutoff have been around a while. I think every BMW has had start/stop and an 8 speed the past 3 years. Lexus had an 8-speed transmission 9 years ago. I also heard a Ford engineer say that start/stop gave about a 5% gain in city fuel economy. So that is going from 20 to 21 mpg. Not a deal breaker for most people. I think a 300 hp V6 with start/stop, 8 speed auto, 22/31 mpg is what is expected in a $35,000 car. The Chrysler 300 had 300 hp and 31 mpg and an 8 speed n 2012. That is just what is expected of the segment. I think the Lacrosse engine is what the buyers want and expect.
  20. smk4565
    The LaCrosse absolutely competes with the Toyota Avalon, that is the car is was modeled after pretty much. The Avalon actually has a higher base price than the LaCrosse, so do the Cadenza and Azera. The Lexus ES costs more than all of those cars, and until a couple years ago the Lexus ES was about the size of a Regal. Buick is not a luxury brand either, it is a premium brand. Cadillac is the luxury brand of GM. If you want more than 300 hp buy a Cadillac. This is also why I have been saying Cadillac should make the 3.6 V6 base in the CTS and CT6, 3.0TT as a mid-level volume engine. Buick doesn't need a 400 hp car, Cadillac makes 400 hp cars. Lincoln can put all the power they want into the MKZ, it is still a Fusion. The 400 hp is to cover up the inferior chassis underneath. And that won't really help sales all that much, it might just get some people that were going to buy an MKZ anyway to spend more money on it.
  21. smk4565
    Start/Stop and 8-speeds have been around for a few years. I saw a Ford engineer say that 90% of 2017 Escapes will be sold with start/stop, this is pretty standard stuff now, I think in 2020 it will be as common as ABS. The Lacrosse will be fast enough for what it is. 305 HP is a lot for front wheel drive. And it is more important that a car like the Lacrosse has enough power to move around with the engine at 3,000 rpm or less. The typical Lacrosse buyer doesn't want to be revving to 6,000 rpm and bearing engine noise all the time.
  22. smk4565
    I made a mistake before, the S-class hybrid is rear drive, not AWD. Even the TT V8 CT6 should be able to start under $90k. If a Platinum turbo V6 is $80-something, adding 2 cylinders shouldn't push the price too much. I think the hybrid has to be cheap or it won't sell at all. People would rather have a V8 than a hybrid. Look at the Escalade, one of Cadillac's best sellers and it is thirsty as hell. Luxury buyers don't care about gas mileage. The exception to the rule is Tesla because it is modern and trendy and the car does 0-60 in 3 seconds, so it can beat all the V8s anyway.
  23. smk4565
    The TT V6 model is probably only the middle and high trims. The hybrid shouldn't cost any more than the TT V6. The cheapest S-class you can buy is the plug-in hybrid, and they probably don't even sell many of them. I think if Cadillac wants to sell any hybrids it needs to be cheap. This is the problem facing all electric cars and hybrids. Gas is cheap and here people don't care about fuel savings, people would rather pay $85,000 for an Escalade that gets 15 mpg than to buy a CT6 hybrid. Until they apply a gas guzzler tax to any vehicle under 25 mpg EPA combined number, people won't look for a hybrid or electric. With the exception of the tree hugger crowd that buy the Prius.
  24. smk4565
    Who says this will be near $100k? If it is they will sell like 5 of them all year. I don't see why they couldn't make a hybrid 4 cylinder model the same price as a turbo V6.
  25. smk4565
    Hopefully they price it or below the TT V6 model, they have to price it cheaper than the ELR. Interesting now the transmission works. Memo to Cadillac, put this drive train in the ATS sedan and coupe, and kill off the ELR.
×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

I've whitelisted
Continue without support

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search