Jump to content
Create New...

smk4565

Members
  • Posts

    13,794
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

Everything posted by smk4565

  1. Interestingly enough, the 4-series Grand Coupe outsells the 4-series 2 door. So in reality the best selling 4-series is a sedan. Which is why they might as well just make a 3-series sedan and 3-series coupe like the old days.
  2. Well they still have the 6-series sedan, errr Grand Coupe, which has a higher base price than a 7-series I think, it used to, which made no sense. Journalists are probably hoping for some sort of M860i with a 600 hp V12, but if Mercedes questions whether the S-class coupe will have enough buyers to survive, no way a BMW version will find enough. BMW just said a week or two ago that they would not jump into the hyper car game because even though their engineers would love to, they don't have the resources or money to do it. So makes you wonder why jump into an 8-series? That ties up resources and money as well for a slow seller. And at a time when the 3-series is losing sales fast, and the market wants SUVs. Hell make an X8 crossover coupe, as stupid as that sounds it would outsell any $100k coupe they come up with.
  3. More sales for the E-class coupe. BMW might as well can the 8-series now, no one is going to buy that, even though I liked the 90s 850csi.
  4. Cadenza is both of those things but the Azera is irrelevant, Taurus is in its swan song and will be dead by 2020 and Imapala and Avalon sales are dropping 20-30% each year. There just isn't much reason to stay in this segment unless you are a top 3 or 4 seller.
  5. Stringer could work because it would be a lower price point and a sporty car that they don't have. But Stinger could make the Cadenza irrelevant also.
  6. They can drop the K900 now, that has been a flop.
  7. I'd like it if Lincoln made a great Continental but they didn't. The last Lincoln product that was a hit was the Navigator in 1998 and then fumbled that after about 5 years and haven't done anything since. So back to Tesla this is a reason I think they will surpass Lincoln around 2020, or when ever Tesla gets their 2nd SUV out. Once they have 2 sedans and 2 SUV they will beat Lincoln and never look back.
  8. Agreed, if someone wants a large car they don't going to buy an A4 or C-class. But the Continental is supposed to sell based on interior, ride quality and being quiet. It isn't that quite and it rides on a Fusion chassis. So the interior better be amazing, and it isn't. The XTS is just as nice and well made as a Continental, and the XTS is dated and has one wheel in the grave.
  9. It does look too much like a Q7, they need a more squared off rear end to make it look like a Range Rover if they want a variant of it. I would think a hybrid or electric powertrain should come into play. I wonder if they could do a convertible version. They probably need a long wheel base because Maybach is coming and so is Rolls Royce.
  10. They don't, the 400 hp twin turbo V6 does 0-60 in 5.4 seconds. The base V6 must be lethargic. The E-class V6 does 0-60 in 4.2 seconds. Gets better gas mileage too. And I know, the Continental isn't about performance, it is about "quiet luxury" but an E-class is quieter than it (63 DBA at 70 mph vs 67 in the Lincoln), and has air suspension. Give the Continental another year and it will be a fleet car like the MKS or Town Car were. The Continental should be priced like a Lexus ES, more like $38k base and $55k for a loaded 400 hp Black Label with free maintenance. Then maybe it is a worthwhile buy.
  11. A C-class has a better interior than a Continental though, unless you are talking rear seat room. CTS does have a bad center stack, Continental has a bit more in luxury than CTS, but CTS has it in chassis and transmission, call the engines a tie without the V. You can run a Continental up to $70k, that is a well equipped E-class. I'd still take the A6 which is from 2012 I think over a Continental interior. Plus the Fusion underpinnings and 6-speed auto from 2010 are huge down grades to the Continental. With how little they spent on the mechanicals, the Continental should have an A8 level interior because they $25k sedan under pinnings.
  12. Excellent point. You have to review cars for intended purpose. A Lucerne should be reviewed for how well does it haul old folks to bingo. It isn't a performance car. It should be compared to handling and ride of an Avalon. For the Continental though, it can't match performance with any other $50-70k luxury car, so it better smoke them in interior and it does not. To comment on your later post, I'll give you that Continental better lines up price wise with CTS, G80 and A6, S90 also, but I think the only one it beats in that group is G80, it is maybe equal to a CTS, it isn't better than the A6 which is old.
  13. 100% correct. When Audi and Mercedes are selling EV's and get them to production quicker than Tesla, and have better interiors than Tesla, then Tesla has a fight on their hands. So it will be interesting to see how they respond to direct competition.
  14. A Model S interior is on par with a Corvette or CTS, if you like technology and touchscreens it is better, if you like wood trim on doors, maybe a nod to the CTS, so to each their own. Model S isn't a $100k sedan interior, but it selling performance and quietness and no gasoline, so they can get by with a $60k car interior. Continental's interior isn't better than any of the German 3, it isn't better than the CT6, not better than a Genesis G90, not better than an S90. So it is like the worst interior of the $50-70k segment. It is better than a Lexus GS, so maybe 2nd worst interior in the segment. Worst chassis for sure.
  15. I have sat in a Model S, I thought it was like a nice Volvo or almost a Saab-like in the way that it is modern and simplistic. But it feels more like a $50-60k car interior, I don't think it is as nice as some Audis, or the E-class or 5-series. A Model S P100D starts at $140,000 and runs up to $160,00 if you check all the option boxes. Cadillac isn't there. Look at a CT6, base price like $54k and that is their top car. If you max out the options list on an Escalade you get to $100k, but most luxury brands maxed out are nearing or above $200k.
  16. I don't think Tesla has $100k car interiors, or even $65k car interiors, but it isn't like the glorified Fusions and Escapes that Lincoln has are setting any new standard. Even the Continental is pretty weak inside. The CT6 is nicer than a Model S on the inside. I do think Tesla needs to improve their interiors, but they are competitive with other American luxury car interiors, maybe just not the top Cadillacs, but the lower Cadillacs.
  17. Telsa sells $100k sedans, something Lincoln or Cadillac are not capable of. Tesla also makes a car much faster than any Lincoln or Cadillac. Based on performance and price point, and brand image, they mop the floor with Lincoln or Cadillac. I don't think Tesla interiors are the end all be all, but they are on par or better than any Lincoln for sure, and I'd say better than most at Cadillac.
  18. Even if Tesla sells 200k cars and not 500k they are the top American luxury brand.
  19. I think the pricing is good, it is a little more than a Toyota, Chevy or Mazda, but you expect that, GMC is positioned a little higher. GMC needs a vehicle below the Terrain like in the Jeep Renegade segment.
  20. I just read a survey that 30 million people say their next car will be electric. Might take years for those 30 million to buy cars but they are coming. It is actually very possible that Tesla overtakes Lincoln and Cadillac in 2022 to become the top selling American luxury brand.
  21. Except for the gas mileage part of it.
  22. I think Chevy could get a crossover in between Trax and Equinox, and another in between Equinox and Traverse. Not sure if they could go below the Trax with a Spark based crossover. They could give Buick a 4th crossover. There seems to be no saturation point with these things.
  23. Lots of people. They could sell an ADX below the CDX if they wanted. Lexus is building a crossover below the NX. The Rav4 and CRV have grown, they need vehicles a size class below that which opens the door to smaller than NX and smaller than RDX crossovers. And they could probably go a size below that to what the Encore is. I bet Lincoln has a version of the Ford Ecosport within 2 years for $29,900.
  24. XT5 had a great month, anything over 5,000 in that $40-50k lux SUV segment is strong as most sell more like 3500 a month. The Q5 topped 5,000 last month, that is where you want to be in this segment. CTS is supposed to be a direct competitor to the 5 series and it has an $8000 price advantage that is a fair sales comparison. Cadillac's sedans just don't get the job done in sales and I think they will only consolidate them as times goes on. Will be interesting to see what happens to XT5 sales when a cheaper XT4 is available.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search