Jump to content
News
Reviews
Discussons
Activity
Create New...
Close

smk4565

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    13,685

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    11

 Content Type 

Everything posted by smk4565

  1. smk4565
    Toyota isn't strapped for cash and I am not saying overnight, but the Toyota 3.5 V6 originally came out in 2004, I had to look it up because the earliest I remember it was the 2006 Lexus GS redesign. And sure they added some VVT or direct injection over the years, but this is the same bones as the engine in this:
  2. smk4565
    The Camry V6 gets 22/32 mpg, the 4 cylinder gets 28/39 mpg. They could add a turbo to the 2.5 liter get the same power and acceleration as the V6 and if they lose 2 mpg with a turbo add they are still at 26/37 mpg, that is a 4.5 mpg gain, that is the benefit to the customer. I can see the age 75+ crowd that buys this thing wanting a V6 because their old ES had one, and their 90s Camry had one and their 80s Buick had one, and buy gosh they are a V6 man. But then why not make an all new small displacement V6 with a turbo that makes 300 hp/300 lb-ft that gets better gas mileage than this 3.5 liter unit from 2008.
  3. smk4565
    Why not use a turbo 4 with or without electric assist with gets better gas mileage and makes the same power and torque? I think a 2008 CTS had a 304 hp V6 if memory serves me correctly, that is 10 years ago, and Lexus hasn't gone past that yet.
  4. smk4565
    Wow a 302 hp V6, how 2011 of them to offer that!
  5. smk4565
    Now they are onto something. The i3 is an ugly looking car with odd proportions and that combined with the small range is why it doesn't sell. This looks like a legit BMW, this will sell. These quirky, goofy EV's were never going to sell, I think car makers though EV buyers wanted something different. What people want is a BMW crossover, and BMW is giving them a BMW crossover.
  6. smk4565
    I think this new A-class looks quite sharp, the inside looks good too compared to others in the segment. I think this will do well in China and in Europe with the small streets as others have mentioned. Doesn't look like an S-class...
  7. smk4565
    A Suburban is not a 3-box design. The Cadillac counter to this would be a 4 seat Escalade with a 63 Corvette inspired split rear window glass behind the 2nd row seats and a small trunk behind that.
  8. smk4565
    The interior is very nice and they can put a fine china tea service with heated trays in any car. Some of this is just stuff to put in a Maybach S-class or GLS for the Chinese market because that is where Maybach sells. I think there is a chance that they make a 3 box design SUV just to be different because when you look a Bentley Bentayga it has the shape of a Q7, the Escalade has the shape of a Tahoe, etc. This is unique and the Uber rich like having what no one else has.
  9. smk4565
    I read in addition to the Defender, Land Rover wants to add 3 more vehicles, so a pickup could be one. They make 4 or 5 Range Rovers, they could make 3 Defenders and 3 Discoveries and Freelander is supposed to come back.
  10. smk4565
    Hyundai definitely needs to build this, I said that when the concept first came out. I am sure it won't look like the concept but they need a pickup. And I think a unibody design that has the same towing and weight hauling ability of a Santa Fe is fine, because for a lot of people that is all they need. I also think there are people that may want a pick up (and possibly a lot of females) but don't want something so truck like and high off the ground or with a 10,000 lb tow rating since they will never tow. The current pick up trucks are almost the SUV equivalent of the 3-row SUV, well not everyone needs a 3-row or can afford it, so all these small SUVs exploded onto the market. Small pickups can make a rise too, and I mean smaller than a Colorado or Tacoma.
  11. smk4565
    I don't think they will build this, but I did get a 1930s vibe from it when I first saw it. They are going to do a Maybach trim of the GLS. If they do a standalone Maybach model, no way will it look like this.
  12. smk4565
    I am on board with the front half of this but I have no idea why an s-class coupe trunk is on an SUV. Mercedes needs to pass on this body style. However, if they built this, at least 5 other car makers will build an SUV with a trunk to copy this.
  13. smk4565
    Why don’t the use a turbo V6? Oooorrrrr, wait for it....... inline turbo 6 with electric assist. That would be much more refined and quiet.
  14. smk4565
    Exactly. This is a fancy Enclave/Traverse, with the corporate 3.6 V6 and transmission. I don't see them doing anything exciting here, at most an optional turbo on the V6, but Lincoln already does that, and to quote Kurt Angle "who did they ever beat, where are their gold medals?"
  15. smk4565
    Looks like a Toyota, which is another way of saying, it looks ugly.
  16. smk4565
    I think just Formula 1 now and next year they are doing Formula E. I think they gave up all the touring car racing stuff to focus on EV racing. But Formula 1 is the #1 Motorsport globally so that is where to be.
  17. smk4565
    I bet they could put leather seats in the back of a Unimog and pass it off as some sort of luxury wilderness exploration vehicle and sell them for $500k here as a Rolls Royce SUV competitor.
  18. smk4565
    It is actually Mercedes has the best racing team Mercedes is the standard everyone is chasing Sales figures are everything and Mercedes is #1 in luxury sales
  19. smk4565
    Not a fan of that grill still. Looking like the LS is good since you could sort of confuse the 2 and think this car costs more than it does. But to me it is still a Toyota Avalon with an ugly grille. I guess it would stand out which is a plus, compared to the forgettable styling of early 2000s Lexuses.
  20. smk4565
    I have not, the most expensive Escalade costs less than the a base model G-wagen. The G65 was like $250,000 in it's final edition. It is ridiculous to compare them on price. I know, I just brought it up because the CTS is now bigger than the STS was when it was here, and a complaint on the STS was it was too big, too heavy, not sporty enough to take on the smaller, more nimble Germans. And Cadillac killed the STS, only to make the same car 4 years later, but with the name of their entry level car. Horrible product planning. That would be like killing the Malibu, only to make the Cruze a mid-size Camry/Accord fighter for $25,000 in 2022 and then wondering why it doesn't sell.
  21. smk4565
    Very good point, is he good or a corporate Yes man that will push the GM agenda and we get big discounts to move old metal. I imagine the XT7 will be out as fast as they can put Cadillac badges on an Enclave.
  22. smk4565
    Because the G-wagon is a mid size SUV it has the same length as an XT5. It isn’t suppose to be a full size SUV.
  23. smk4565
    If Johan didn’t come up with the naming scheme they need to fire whoever did.
  24. smk4565
    No need for Cadillac to worry, when the Maybach SUV goes on sale next year Lincoln will be giving $10,000 off on all Navigators with 0% financing.
  25. smk4565
    There is size creep in all segments, but the CTS is larger than a 5-series. The CTS-V is 197.6 inches long that is bigger than the STS. The 3-series sedan is 184.5 inches long, it also doesn't have a sales problem like the CTS has.
×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

I've whitelisted
Continue without support

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search