Cory Wolfe

Holy mother of hercules is that thing ugly!!

I love the Turbo 4 engine. It's worth every penny to me.

Yep.

Well, I'll agree with Siegen on the 90's comment. The interior is nothing but that, and the front styling is no better than the Elantra. Again, I wish it looked more like the SR concept. Now it looked thoroughly modern.

Reg is a marijuana addict.

Eh... it's not entirely ugly, but it's like a bland ugly, as if Toyota tried too hard.

Of course I have, and it's entirely possible. Still, what proof is there? It's still just someone's word against another. And GM, among others, that supposedly get better real world gas mileage than EPA results don't complain about it or anything to that degree. So for all this bickering back and forth about something with virtually no proof is... well... retarded. Hence why I posted. Now... excuse me while I go for a drive in my 33 mpg Millenia...

Okay... in differentiating it from the gasoline powered Equinox, they make the Torrent even less unique. Otherwise... Cool. Great to see the technology expanding and being offered in a fleet, albeit a small one.

Of course... although its the little things that make the difference.

Yeah, that was such a high priority for me. Unless someone works at the plant and inspects each and every Aura that is built and sent out all through out the country, no one has any evidence that anything's been fixed at all. I know what I saw. You know what you saw. He knows what he saw. Others know what they saw. Even then, that's what? .01% of all Auras made? Again... just saying...

Suuuuure... I believe you... I'm obviously not the only one that experienced issues with production Auras. Besides, being that you work at only one Saturn dealership, how can you speak for all Auras delivered across the entire country and into Canada and such? Just saying...

Ironically.. I hate fish. I love LJS's chicken, fries, and hush puppies, though! Luckily, the LJS's around here are pretty good, as are most fast food joints. The one's to avoid, though, are definitely the Taco Bell and McDonald's around. Ugh. Last time I ate at either, I got sick as a horse.

Um... I love Long John Silver's!!!!

Agreed. (Wow.. I think me and Croc have agree more than tonight than ever before! ) Anywho.. This is tough. I see vehicles like the Cherokee, Fiero, MC SS, Caprice Classic, F-bods, etc as quintessential 80's designs. Those like the F-bods again, Explorer, F150, Taurus, Neon, etc as quintessential 90's designs (some regretfully). The 70's? Man... I'd have to say the 77ish Thunderbird, Mopar sedans, and perhaps GM A bodies. The 60's? Easy. 64 GTO, Mustang, 65 Impala, F-bods, etc. The 50's? Another easy one. 59 Cadillacs, 57 Chevies, and 58 Pontiacs.

It's called reality and not being blindly loyal... not to mention everyone has their own opinion.

Um... those are stock wheels. Heh, me too. The M is my least favorite Infiniti sedan. I was just making a point. I always wondered that as well... especially the better looking headlights and fascias and such. That's why my Millenia has a certain dead button. The other's for a missing option.

I bet not. Especially the door glass since its so obviously different.

I said with the previous Altima, smart one.Secondly, as far as the Altima and Maxima... The doors are different, the headlights are different, the panels are different. If you even begin to suggest they are the same, I will begin to suggest that you're not entirely too smart or don't have much for eyesight. The differences are there and pretty notable. Even for the inner structures. Then you must consider different measurements between the Altima and Maxima. I'm not denying some parts are shared, but to suggest it's even remotely similar to the BLS/9-3 twins strategy is absolutely ridiculous. Have you ever heard of shared design cues between vehicles in one brand? These look more different than what BMWs used to... and those certainly werent alike the BLS/9-3 twins. Sometimes Reg, you really make me wonder about you...

Still pretty ugly if you ask me.

Wish it were more like the SR concept... But being that it kept some of the general look of it, I guess it could be riced out to look like it.

Love the interior... and that's about it. The rear is growing on me and sides are decent but that front is just hideous is likely to never grow on me.

Please tell me you're kidding. Any person with any eyesight what so ever could see how its simply an all new styled vehicle than the previous one. Point out one shared part. I dare you.Although, I will agree that the headlights and taillights are overdone, unlike most Nissans. Heh... Actually, I'm not much of a fan of them. Be it that they're stuck there on a hard edged center stack or that the side vents are rectangular and just dont seem to fit in with the general design. As far as the steering wheel, though, I much prefer Nissan's three spokes. This four spoke is ugly. Anywho... Love the exterior design and the interior is starting to grow on me.

Love the ads... As far as real world mileage versus statistics... Anyone can lie. I could say my Millenia gets 33 mpg. I could say my mother's Sunfire gets 42 mpg. Edmunds writers could say a Silverado gets 29 mpg. Who says its true? It's one persons word against another's. While the EPA estimates may not be the most accurate judge of a vehicle's true mileage (Prius' mileage dully noted), it's actual statistics from an actual standardized test that all manufacturers seem to have no probably accepting the figures that result from it. Are there any other systems' recorded mileage out there that are quoted and gloated about by manufacturers? Answer me that.

Wow... that interior is nice.

BV likes. Although... Parts of the dash looks cheap and I agree with the general consensus that the taillights could have looked better.