Cory Wolfe

Ouch.

"Starsky and Hutch" Torino.

Yes, you better note the smiley, as I was being facetious.Also, Fiero's are some of the safest cars out there. I don't know what you're talking about. As well, a two seat roadster is quite a bit different than the usual hardtop. Oh, and I didn't mention B-pillars, just hardtops. Fool.

I do it with my Grandpa, the only person in the family I talk cars with. He usually mentions what he's heard on the news or whatnot and I correct him. Plus, he's just old school. He can't grasp that cars make it over 100k miles. *shakes head*

Oh... not that again.

Pfft. Hardtop, lardtop... I'd rather not die when I get t-boned by some red-light-running-redneck.

Cool pic.

No... This is far more than that. To put things into perspective... Let's say Pontiac comes out with a new Fiero. The concept is absolutely stunning. I soon learn it will go into production. I am stoked. It has everything to make it the perfect Fiero. ME layout, sexy styling, flying buttresses, etc. I make it known that I will buy one when it comes out. After a year, speculation is heavy and we begin to find out certain details of the production version. One of those being that the flying buttresses will disappear for an aerodynamically superior glass hatch, but the look will remain very much the same. Because of this and my love of flying buttresses... I state that I will not buy one if this is the case, despite it being the perfect Fiero otherwise. I like quality interiors, yet I've bought a 1995 Grand Am (I think that speaks for itself). I like coupes, yet I've bought a sedan. I like sporty cars, yet I've bought a luxury car. I like manual transmissions yet I've bought a car with an automatic. I like RWD vehicles, yet I bought two FWD vehicles. And so on. These, with cars that I've stated I've liked, but obviously don't compare to my favorite, the Fiero. So, after learning the above, I would state that I wouldn't buy a modern reincarnation of a Fiero, my absolute favorite car, simply because of a lack of actual flying buttresses. Yeah... Are you guys going to tell me that you would not bitch me out over something so petty, so hypocritical, so stupid? I don't think so. Not all modern B-pillars are 4 inches wide and inhibit use of the rear passenger windows.

Impala keeps inching closer to Accord territory, on a random side note. 121k vs. 108k YTD. Minus rental sales it's probably not much of a contest, though.

Agreed. It's my favorite LX car despite being a wagon. The Charger is just decent while the 300 is horrid.

Ever consider submitting yourself into a mental institution? Seriously. You've bought Japanese cars, yet you condemn them. You've bought FWD cars, yet you condemn them. You've bought unibody cars, yet you condemn them. You've bought cars with B-pillars, yet you condemn them. So when it comes to the new Camaro, being styled after your favorite generation of Camaro and being a V8 powered, RWD, American sports car, you won't buy it simply because of the B-pillar. Yeah... That's the absolute most retarded and hypocritical thing I've ever read in the 3.5 years I've been here.

Yeah... Those 88-91 Bonnevilles sure are cars that people would place over Fieros in a list like this.

I'm still flabbergasted that people can actually leave the Fiero off of it. You people suck.

As far as I know it was the cat. converter... Though, I have no idea why it wouldn't start after it was replaced.

Meanwhile, nothing I said implied that you implied any of that. It was a general statement to answer what you were asking. Silly boy.

Do did did.. what? But yes, as of my last post, it seems to be fixed.

Oh wow... B-pillars... Such disappointment.

Lotus Elise. Ironic.

Porn rules.

I think you're nuts.

Park Avenues sales are up 604.2%.