Cory Wolfe

Like non-auto enthusiasts notice, which, was your point.

Err... Are you sure you're not blind? There are clearly differences between the grills of the M and G. If anything, the previous CTS, STS, and SRX's grills are more identical. The new CTS and STS grills pretty much are as well.

Take a look at the fronts of most any brand of the same vintage. You'll find the same damn thing. It's called a family resemblence. Most brands have one. Hell, most cars from the '70s, '80s and early '90s look a like regardless of brand. Your old Cutlass Supreme could easily be mistaken for a Grand Prix or even a Sunbird by the aforementioned "mother test". My mom does it on a regular basis.

From what was shown of the new Mazda6, it will easily be the best looking midsizer, which, certainly warrants more than what you were willing to give it credit for. Also, any self respecting auto enthusiast could tell which was the M and the G... With their eyes closed. Similar design theme or not, its easy to see the differences. As for the greenhouse, again, there is absolutely NOTHING similar between it and a Saab. I'm beginning to think that you're delusional.

I'm thinking your biased ass might. The only thing I nearly come to agreement with are the comments about the interior. That Saab comment was just silly... There is nothing remotely similar about it and any Saab. And if one can't tell the difference between an M and a G, I pull the blindness card. Personally, I wasn't much of a fan of the M, but these slight changes improve upon its looks greatly. I especially like the view from the rear now.

That is besides the point. No one was comparing the PT's interior to anything other than the PT, itself. The HHR is completely irrelevant in this conversation. The point was, the current PT's interior was a huge downgrade from the previous one. Simple. IMO, though, the HHR's is better designed. It may not have a nice steering wheel, that great of a center console, or much brightwork.. but the design is sensible, likable, and best of all: not ugly.

Well that's sort of ironic...

Err.. Who mentioned the HHR? This is about the PT, solely. The current interior is a huge downgrade from the current. Oh wow... "The stylish steering wheel, the well-designed center console, and a nicer radio", such merits for being a nice interior... Not. It's completely cheap. This is in comparison to the pre-refresh PT. Without the eye-sore that is the center stack and that horrible misplaced dash grip, it would be a decent interior, but still lacking in comparison. The design, as a whole, doesn't mesh together well. It's a complete mess, whereas the previous interior looked properly designed and integrated.

I like Rick Rubin as a producer. BTW, Mustang, I like your new GT4 inspired sig. It's snazzy.

Haha... *thinks to himself* Ironic.

Oh come on.. You know that survey is fun.

It's... interesting.

Already posted: http://www.cheersandgears.com/forums/index...showtopic=19211

Can I have some of what you're smoking? Please?

Damn. That is just... Wow. Amazingly dull.

It looks cheesy and doesn't have a true manual. Moving on...

Hmm... If it weren't for the grill and front/rear bumpers, it wouldn't look so bad. I mean, looking at this pic, the front bumper looks like a park bench. It's huge! Otherwise, it looks good.

But... but.. but..

All hail the cosmic muffin!

Well they're gay.

Happy belated birthday, Sirs.

SoCal seems to be more my style, especially the car culture. NoCal seems more stuck-up, but then San Fran is like my dream city.

Hmm.. So far I'm really not liking it.

Oh, I thought of another way even thought you seem to have it figured out. Do a history check on your VIN. Usually it will have the trim listed.