Cory Wolfe

Need I remind you, once again, that what you see isn't relative to an entire country. Duh.

Necessities: -Clean, fluid, purposeful styling. -Controlled, capable handling. -Smooth, linear power delivery. -Inviting, high quality interior. -Minimal weight. -Attractive backlighting. -Air Conditioning. -The ability to play CDs. -Powered accessories. -Comfortable, supportive seats. -Performance relative to the weight. -Non-sucky-ness. Wouldn't Minds; Preferred but not deal breakers: -Leather. -Heated seats. -Sunroof. -Projector headlights. -Fog lamps. -Back seat. -Fuel economy. -Manual Transmission. -Lack of amber lenses. -Rear wheel drive layout. -Random, assorted luxury nick-naks. -Random, assorted sporting details. Oh Hell No's; Absolute deal breakers: -Styling that sucks. -Engines that suck. -Interiors that suck. -Features that suck. -Handling that sucks. -Just about anything that sucks, feel free to use your imagination.

You know... the picture of the Shadow's interior actually does sort of look like the Camaro's...

While we're at it, do something with that silly bar at the top of the grill. I can't stand it.

Stop generalizing you obnoxious fool. You think that because one person says one thing, then someone else says another, they all share the same view. Give it up already and realize there's more out there than Chrysler fans. Not everyone is going to like everything you like. You can't say one thing about Chrysler without gushing, not that I've seen from your posts, anyways. You may be too busy just being snide on these forums. Regardless, a good amount of people here can atleast take off their blinders every once in a while... however rare that sometimes is. While I still think it's too much of a copy of the original (sure, it's fatter, but that's not a design element), I never said it was a bad design. Copy or not, an attractive design is an attractive design. I wish the slope of the rear windshield was ever so slightly more fastback like, though. I'd say the taillights are my favorite part. Full width lights need to make a comeback.

The one with the NAV screen at the bottom of the stack is hilariously pathetic. I mean... a screen that low is completely silly.

I'd say.... either a Saab 9-3/9-5 or a Subaru WRX. The few other possibilities don't really fit you.

Well, it's not the Miller Cycle. That one has a supercharger to get around. Mine doesn't. Changing the spark plugs takes about 10 minutes with my Millenia. It took me nearly an hour in the Cutlass. Everything is in the way and they're down on the sides. Plus, there's about two inches of clearance to get at the last two plugs on the right side due all the A/C and heater crap. With my Millenia, their right on top. The back ones have the intake to deal with, but it's not in the way. VS

Autoblog: Suzuki Equator at Chicago Gallery

Again, who cares? Different brands, all the same. Only we would argue for something as asinine as "Oh... well... they're under the same ownership, so it doesn't count." The general public isn't going to notice the difference, either way.

Same as the Lambdas, too...

...Who cares?

So that's what I'm seeing. No wonder it looks long and bulky. I wish they'd off a short wheelbase version. I must say, though... The interior looks mighty nice. Certainly the best feature. Let's hope Chevy keeps getting great interiors and makes them even better. So far, 2 for 2.

Hmm... I guess the more I look at it, it's not that bad.

Oh wow... They ruined it. The original may not have been exciting, but it was attractive. This is just pathetic.

Minus the performance.

Getting back on topic... I hope they offer it in more colors... That is quite the depressing interior, as is. It's needs a burst of color.

Haha, no doubt. I've been looking for a replacement for the past two weeks, but haven't found anything notable and haven't had any revelations.

We all do, at times. Some of us seem to know when to move on more than others.

I can donate the Cutlass for whenever you feel a beating may occur. It's kickable!

Whitney just sings it better, quite simply.

High res pics at Autoblog. http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2009-chevro...raverse/625400/

Oh... and there are alot of pics of the Challenger at Autoblog. http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-dodge-...-srt8-4/625221/

Sure, if you take it out of context. Anything posted by me is likely to be my opinion. My comment was based on the automotive substance behind all this. Likely the lesser evil, but that was point, however vague it was. But, yes, by all means, I included my opinion on him while excluding my opinion of the topic at hand. That's what I meant, it just wasn't very clear. And still, the point behind what I said remains. It's not what Sixty8 says, it's how he says it. You guys are all sitting here defending his wants, but I don't think anyone has a problem with his wants. That, is what I'm trying to say.

I think it would look even better shorter. As is, the ass looks sort of bulky and long. Otherwise, great.