Jump to content
Create New...

pow

Members
  • Posts

    7,908
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by pow

  1. The 7-series, back in 2002, was first in the US market to have a six-speed torque converter automatic. Ford, in 2005, had the first non-luxury car - 500/Montego - with a six-speed automatic.
  2. Here ya go... For the 2010 Camaro V6 automatic -- EPA window sticker '08+: 18/29 mpg (23 mpg, combined) EPA window sticker <'08: 21/31 mpg (26 mpg, combined) Unadjusted, pre-2008 (CAFE): 23/38 mpg (30 mpg, combined) (Pre-2008 window sticker figures are estimates that are consistent with vehicles of similar mpg; combined figures are weighted 55% city and 45% highway.)
  3. CAFE isn't calculated with consumer EPA figures, but rather pre-2008 MPG that hasn't been adjusted. The Camaro V6, which gets 23-mpg combined, achieves 29-mpg combined CAFE. The light-hybrid Malibu gets 40-mpg combined CAFE.
  4. As an auto enthusiast, that may be the only part of pollution regulation you notice - but there are tons of other industries as well. Recently there's been a lot of focus on ports, which are a huge source of local particulate matter emissions. And for the record, nobody is taking your cars away - this is all based on corporate average fuel economy, and a Volt can more than offset a ZR1. GM's decision to stop STS-V production and G6 GXP excitement has more to do with those vehicles' poor sales.
  5. Agreed. Fake news sucks when it's not funny.
  6. Those quotes above are all conjecture. I want to see the proof - when exactly did the US government say they do not appreciate the Camaro's success? I might as well create an article reporting that the US government is delighted by the sales of the new Camaro, so that GM can pay off their loan sooner. The entire article, that the Camaro is a "headache" for GM, is based off the author's one sentence assertion that the Camaro doesn't have an eco-friendly image.
  7. Glad to hear it's been fixed. Edmunds had the steering column on their long-term AURA replaced as well.
  8. Editorial disguised as a news story. I've yet to see one quote from the government that singles out the new Camaro as inappropriate. Here's the original article the Financial Times "reported" on: Popularity of Camaro headache for GM.
  9. No, it's because they lobbied for and designed this new proposal - which includes one national standard, delayed implementation, and a footprint-based system that allows, say, GM to have a lower CAFE target because they make larger vehicles. The Auto Alliance has always been in favor of higher fuel economy standards - but only those that are consistent in all 50 states.
  10. After years of fighting fuel economy and emissions rules at both the federal and state levels, the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers is finally coming out in favor of the new regulatory framework that will be announced by President Obama tomorrow. The biggest sticking point in recent years has been the move to block California and other states from effectively setting their own fuel economy standards by regulating greenhouse gas emissions. Tomorrow the president is expected to announce new federal rules that will effectively bring CAFE up to the same standard as California's proposal. Because the new rules will retain the footprint based standards from both the California and 2008 NHTSA proposals, it won't completely eliminate larger vehicles. It will, however, be a tough standard, with cars expected to hit 42 mpg by 2016 and trucks coming up to 26 mpg. The alliance supports the proposal because it will allow automakers to work toward one set of regulations. The next big hurdle will be getting everyone to agree on a common standard for calculating the mileage of plug-in hybrid and extended range electric vehicles. The fuel consumption of those vehicles is highly dependent on the duty cycle, including how often they're charged and how far they are driven past battery depletion. But that's tomorrow's fight. The AAM press release is after the jump. --- Washington, DC – On Tuesday, May 19, automakers will join with President Obama, federal agencies, governors and environmental leaders to announce a commitment to establish a National Program that will reduce carbon emissions and increase fuel economy. "For seven long years, there has been a debate over whether states or the federal government should regulate autos. President Obama's announcement ends that old debate by starting a federal rulemaking to set a National Program," said Dave McCurdy, president and CEO, Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers. "Automakers are committed to working with the President to develop a National Program administered by the federal government." "What's significant about the announcement is it launches a new beginning, an era of cooperation. The President has succeeded in bringing three regulatory bodies, 15 states, a dozen automakers and many environmental groups to the table," said McCurdy. "We're all agreeing to work together on a National Program." A National Program is a priority to automakers because a national fuel economy program allows manufacturers to average sales nationwide, so customers in all 50 states can continue to buy the types of vehicles they need for family, business and leisure. A National Program also avoids conflicting standards from different regulatory agencies, and it gives automakers much needed certainty for long- term product planning. In addition, a National Program delivers overall greenhouse gas reductions equal to or better than those that would be realized under separate programs by different regulatory bodies. EPA and NHTSA intend to initiate a joint rulemaking that reflects a coordinated and harmonized approach to implementing the Clean Air Act and the Energy Policy and Conservation Act. The rulemaking is expected to include several elements important to automakers, including: • Preserving Vehicle Diversity: Harmonized NHTSA and EPA standards would be attribute- based, or based on a vehicle's "footprint." This approach allows for a range of sizes of vehicles to meet consumer needs for passenger and cargo room. • Providing Certainty for Long-term Planning: Automakers would know what standards will be through 2016, which is critical in an industry where bringing a product to market typically takes 5-7 years. The National Program is intended to give automakers sufficient lead-time to incorporate technology as part of existing vehicle design schedules, so manufacturers would not have to incur added costs from redesigning all their models at one time. • Providing Flexibility in Achieving CO2-Reduction Goals: EPA and NHTSA would consider a range of compliance flexibility measures, such as earned credits, credit trading, air conditioning credits, and credits for using additional technologies that reduce carbon dioxide (CO2). "The debate over who sets CO2 and fuel economy standards for autos has been decided, but there is still more to talk about. We have the broad outlines of an agreement, but we will need to work closely with NHTSA, EPA and California in the rulemaking process to resolve multiple issues, trying to fit all the elements together into one program. There is a strong commitment from everyone to move past any hurdles that may arise as we work through differences in the way these two federal agencies set standards," said McCurdy. "We want to finalize a national program so we can move on to policy discussions on what the future of sustainable mobility looks like and how we can get there faster," said McCurdy. "Alliance members are supporting measures that reduce carbon dioxide even more, like low carbon fuels, advancements in battery technology and consumer incentives to get more advanced technology autos on our roads." Autos represent 17% of all man-made CO2 in the U.S, according to EPA. Carbon dioxide is created when any fossil fuel burns, whether it is a car burning gasoline or a backyard grill burning charcoal. Therefore, to reduce CO2, automobiles will need to burn less fuel. That means automakers will need to sell fuel-efficient technologies that will produce less CO2. "All industries will be called upon to reduce carbon emissions," said McCurdy. "Automakers play an important role. Today, there are more than 50 auto technologies on sale that reduce emissions, increase mileage and run on clean fuels." Automakers are selling 130 models of automobiles that achieve 30 mpg or greater on the highway. Consumers can now test drive 35 models of hybrids or clean diesel in dealer showrooms. More technology is on its way to market. "We will need to use every engineer we have and every investment dollar available to make our vision of sustainable mobility a reality. And, we are going to need Americans to buy our clean, fuel-efficient autos in large numbers in order to meet this climate change commitment," said McCurdy. The Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers is a trade association of 11 car and light truck manufacturers including BMW Group, Chrysler, Ford Motor Company, General Motors, Jaguar Land Rover, Mazda, Mercedes-Benz, Mitsubishi Motors, Porsche, Toyota and Volkswagen. For more information, visit the Alliance website at www.autoalliance.org.
  11. There's nothing about the Fiesta that makes it prohibitively expensive. It's got a basic engine (no direct injection, no turbochargers), a simple transmission, safety features that most other small cars have - it's just designed better than cars like the Aveo or Yaris or Versa or Fit. And ours will be made in Mexico, which has lower labor costs than Korea. The MK1 US Focus was a global vehicle, too, and that wasn't pricier than its competitors.
  12. Soulless. That simple crease through the side looks cheap whether on the Cruze, Epica, or this thing.
  13. I can't see why not - there are hundreds of OEM suppliers to BMW, Audi, VW, etc in China.
  14. The engineering is Australian, though I believe there's a 60% domestic (China) parts content requirement.
  15. pow

    Spyware/pop-up help

    Thanks for the help guys! I ended up using Malwarebytes, and I've had no pop-ups ever since.
  16. And a Grand Cherokee before that. Seems like a Mopar guy.
  17. Now that Ford has announced investing $550m to retool the Expedition plant for global Focus production, I'll get that over the Fiesta, so long as it has similar styling. The Focus will be made in the US (not Mexico, like the Fiesta), and it will undoubtedly be safer, too.
  18. I always overpay for rentals. The underage fee (18-20) sometimes dwarfs the cost for the actual car.
  19. Cars made by BMW, GM, or VW in China aren't necessarily cheaper than those made elsewhere. It's just that China, like the US, imposes tariffs on imported cars, so manufacturers have another incentive to build locally for local tastes. Stuff like Geely and Chery are cheap because they are cheap. BTW, our gas dryer (Maytag) broke, and we've spent a lot repairing it. Anyone know of a good, efficient, made-in-the-USA dryer?
  20. pow

    Spyware/pop-up help

    Right after posting that, I got a pop-up ad telling me to "Download Registry Defender - Repairs hidden system errors, helps eliminate crashes and freezes, improve system performance!" It's scary... reminds me of those Gmail "related content" ads, only from an unknown source, hidden in my computer.
  21. Hey guys, I've been using my parents' PC, which is infested with the occasional pop-up, and it's driving me insane. The pop-ups are related to whatever website I'm viewing. If I'm on a site about, say, internships, then there will be a Yahoo! Jobs pop-up ad. Sometimes if I click on a link from a Google search, it will automatically take me to a different, spam website. If I click "back" and try again, it's usually okay. It seems like Firefox is working overtime to close these pop-ups - the uppermost "bar" turns light blue, and I have to click on the browser to continue scrolling or typing - though several still come through. It's annoying, and I'm concerned about my security and privacy. I've downloaded the free version of Lavasoft Ad-Aware, and I've run through multiple full scans, and it always finds something new (particularly under "cookies"). Even after deleting these files, the pop-ups still continue. Any help would be great! Thanks.
  22. pow

    I dont get it

    For snowboarding in the Alps?? (Gallardo has AWD)
  23. Unless there's something wrong with the CR-V, its performance shouldn't be any different from other four-cylinder cute 'utes of similar age. Frankly I've never heard anybody complain about the CR-V's performance. Hondas tend to be harsher and noisier, with more feedback and less isolation, not numb. The '04 CR-V weighs 3300 lbs and has 162 lb-ft at 3600 rpm, and I've driven cars with similar torque-to-weight ratios and they all drive fine. Perhaps it's the four-speed weighing it down, though it did get a five-speed auto for 2005.
  24. The 18" chrome wheels on the 1LT are part of the "Sun and Wheel" package, which includes the six-speed auto. The 1LT 3.5 V6 is an interesting one - the fleet models in the past have been in LS trim.
×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search