Jump to content
Create New...

pow

Members
  • Posts

    7,908
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by pow

  1. http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Drive...ine.promo.3.*#2 It looks suprisingly classy and uptown (is that even a word?) in gray... I think it'll be brilliant in Alpha trim with the 5.3L V8 (GMT900's 325 hp? GMT360's all-alloy block and DoD?), six-speed automatic, and larger alloys. Since it weighs less than the Tahoe, it might even get ~17/24 EPA MPG... ----------------------------------- A truck in sheep's clothing By Kelly Toepke Email Date posted: 01-19-2006 As the trail gets steeper and steeper, rougher and rougher, all I can think about is the proximity of the nearest cell tower, and how I will describe our location to the rescue team. "We're two miles south of the big rock, just past the giant stump that looks like the head of Bob's Big Boy." Despite my paranoia, no 911 call is necessary. The 2006 Hummer H3 gets us up, over and home, proving itself to be a real Hummer. We had our doubts. The H3 is based on the mechanicals of the Chevy Colorado/GMC Canyon pickup truck twins, which are about as cutting-edge as a rotary telephone. This thing has leaf springs for God's sake. But instead of being criticized for its crude hardware, the H3 should be praised for its undeniable off-road skills and unapologetic truckness. Urban cowboy Base price is only $28,935, but our test car had a big bag of optional equipment that dragged its as-tested price up to $37,920. Expensive, yes, but many of those options — like the two-tone leather upholstery, the heated seats and the sunroof — made the H3 livable. More handsome than the dash in Chevrolet's Trailblazer, the H3's dashboard successfully melds Hummer bravado with style. Brushed machine-finished metal trim frames the H3's center stack; and chrome door handles and a shiny H3 badge in the middle of the thick, leather-wrapped steering wheel brighten the sporty interior. Front dual-stage airbags are standard, while roof-rail-mounted side curtain airbags are optional. The seating position is a little awkward, forcing driver and passenger to sit with their legs splayed out in front of them, but the seats themselves are supportive and well shaped. Front passengers get nearly 42 inches of legroom, and rear passengers 35 inches. Both measurements are on par with the space available in a Jeep Grand Cherokee and a Toyota 4Runner. Gauges look cool, and controls are generally well placed with the exception of the heated seat switches which are buried on the outboard area of the seat bottom. Rearward visibility, however, is terrible thanks to the spare tire mounted on the cargo door. This location for the heavy spare tire also dictates that the cargo door opens to the side instead of up, which can be a problem in tight city parking. Plus, the door doesn't stay open if the truck is parked on any kind of incline. Even the slightest slope is enough to cause it to close quickly with a loud slam, hopefully not taking any fingers with it. The H3 also carries less than you'd think. Although the H3 is nearly identical in overall length and rear-seat legroom to the Grand Cherokee, the Jeep has 5 more cubic feet in its cargo hold than the H3. When the rear seats in both SUVs are folded down, that difference triples to a 15-cubic-foot advantage for the Jeep. Part of the problem is that the H3's 60/40-split rear seat doesn't fold completely flat. Tough terrain tackler Move beyond its leather-lined interior and fancy brushed metal trim and the H3's true nature is revealed. Macho men who want to climb rough terrain will find the H3 a willing accomplice. Over 2 feet shorter, 6 inches lower and 6.5 inches narrower than the Hummer H2, the H3 is more nimble on the trail. Also, a wide track, short overhangs, and a turning circle that's a foot tighter than a Chevrolet Malibu's improves the H3's agility. Nine inches of ground clearance help the SUV clear low ruts and rocks. Doing the dirty work underneath is the H3's ladder-type frame, standard electronically controlled four-wheel-drive unit and traction control system. Hard-core rock crawlers will want to opt for the Off-Road package which adds LT285/75R16 rubber (larger tires than those offered on any other midsize SUV), an electronically controlled locking rear differential, a 4-to-1 two-speed transfer case that helps keep the revs up at low speeds, and specially tuned shocks. The ride on those massive 33-inch Bridgestone tires isn't exactly compliant, but we didn't feel jostled about unnecessarily, either. It's a trucklike ride, but it's not excessively harsh. Short on power If there's a shortcoming, it's under the H3's hood. The truck shares the same 3.5-liter, inline five-cylinder engine found in the Chevrolet Colorado/GMC Canyon. It's rated at 220 horsepower at 5,600 rpm and 225 pound-feet of torque at 2,800, which just isn't enough muscle in a truck this size. Although the engine feels more refined in the Hummer, the H3's 0-to-60-mph time of 11 seconds means a larger engine is needed. For the first time Hummer is offering a choice of transmissions — a standard five-speed manual or an electronically controlled four-speed automatic. Our truck had the optional automatic which didn't disappoint on the freeway or the rocky trail. Serious off-roaders may prefer the manual for more control, but most truck enthusiasts will be satisfied with the automatic's gearing. The combo posts a combined EPA mpg rating of 17.5. Our number during a 500-mile test was a disappointing 13 mpg. 4,700 pounds of rolling mass Hauling down the H3's substantial 4,700-pound bulk is no easy task. Even with its four-wheel antilock disc brakes, the H3 stopped from 60 mph in a lengthy 141 feet. There was also more brake dive than we would like. Long stopping distances aren't that uncommon for hefty SUVs, but the H3 might have earned a better mark without the deep knobby tread of its serious off-road tires. Using the power-assisted rack and pinion steering to place the H3 between the slalom cones was equally entertaining. A maximum speed of just 56.4 mph was achieved before the H3 started to pick up its inside front tire while exhibiting major body roll. Still, this is not unusual for a truck-based SUV, and handling is better than expected out on the open road. Like it for all the right reasons It really doesn't matter how fashionable Hummers become, or how many Hollywood bad girls and Sports Illustrated MVPs load 'em up with dope dubs. What matters is that the Hummer H3 is a lone reed in the field of midsize SUVs. It's a truck, and it's proud of it. This is rare in the age of the soccer mom-ized SUV, and for some people, it's not a bad thing. If you want a comfortable, carlike SUV, go buy one, there are dozens to choose from. But if it's a hard-core, go-anywhere truck that lights your fire, the 2006 Hummer H3 delivers.
  2. Depends on what type of V8 and what car it's attached to.
  3. I did some researching, and it turns out he designed the Velite and Z06, too. Another interesting tid-bit: the guy who did the Solstice and Sky, Franz von Holzhausen, now works at Mazda. He designed the Kabura (aka MX-4) for NAIAS.
  4. Nice... the translation from sketch to actuality should have been better, IMO. Hey, it's a friggin' concept! Go beserk!
  5. Still, Pontiac fixed all the complaints I had with the Equinox, notably the chintzy silver trim, the ugly HVAC knobs, the nasty steering wheel, the dreary grey interior (replaced with black), the blingy front grille, and the dated gauges. It's still flawed engineering-wise, but at least they got the aesthetics right.
  6. Exactly. It's getting difficult to voice my thoughts on a concept without being attacked by razoredge for having different opinions.
  7. There... The fact that it's a Camaro is far more exciting than the actual styling itself. I just can't not think about this when it comes to the concept's sheetmetal surfacing, and overall, the thought put into it simply seems a bit... shallow? It'd be ridiculous to say that it's a poor design, but I feel the Camaro name deserves more than what GM gave it. It's as if GM went through all the motions of remaking a Camaro, but without the X-factor or the real deal. Perhaps the Camaro has such high, historical expectations that makes it difficult for anyone to do a timeless interpretation.
  8. They could "just" sell the Astra VXR over here as a Saturn.
  9. No, the cargo cover is one of those roll-out screens, similar to the privacy covers in SUVs used to hide the cargo area. At least this does prove that the G6 convertible has some trunk space with the top down.
  10. Heh, I don't know why, but the upcoming Escalade Hybrid just seems more appropriate than this Tahoe Hybrid.
  11. Bottled 'cause it's more convenient.
  12. An excellent minivan and family sedan
  13. pow

    Chevrolet SSR

    I'm not sure if this is cost efficient, but if GM wanted more sales, they could've converted it into an SUV by adding two extra doors, more side glass, and a roof.
  14. What GM should do is offer a short wheelbase version of the Enclave with an inhospitable third row, a la MDX, SRX, and Tahoe.
  15. pow

    IS350 Review

    Wish I could have explained that to razoredge...
  16. That depends on brand, not necessarily octane. Interesting link: http://www.toptiergas.com
  17. GTI, preferably 5-door, or MINI Cooper S.
  18. $57K sounds like a lot for a glorified truck, but actually, that's just $7K more than a Tahoe LTZ, and the Escalade has a lot to offer -- better interior quality, more horsepower, more gears...
  19. Exactly, and the top operation isn't exactly fast. Half a minute to get the top up, a few seconds to put something in the trunk, and another half minute of waiting for it to get back down.
  20. My initial reaction to it was positive, but as time wore on, the styling began to bore me. The sharp lines of the concept are almost generic-looking and sterile, and I think it would seriously benefit from more muscle and sculpting. IDK, I just don't think it'll age well; by '08, it'll be old news. Interestingly, the Challenger, which I panned originally, is growing on me, and DCX seems to be in a more suitable position than GM's to accept a limited-appeal niche car. GM can build brilliant Corvettes, Solstices, Skys, and Cadillacs, but why not brilliant mainstream family sedans?
  21. *puke* Personally, I think that looks horrible, as do most aftermarket stick-on "wood."
  22. pow

    Navigation system

    Depends on the car... any car that costs more than $30K should have one. I wouldn't want one on a MINI, but it's a must-have on a 3-series.
  23. My votes: Camaro - bag Challenger - build Scion F3R - bag C30 & Roadjet - bag Imperial - bag AM Rapide - build
  24. After seeing both in person, I have to say that the Lucerne just doesn't feel like a $40K luxury car, and that the Impala SS does a better job at being what it's supposed to be. Yes, it uses cheap materials, but at least it has its own character, unlike the heavily derivative, Buick Avalon.
×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search