I'm sorry, but that's just stupid.
While I agree that Dodge and Chrysler are too close together as far as price goes, they certainly shouldn't be broken off and given to the highest bidder. And while not all of their vehicles are great, many are far from junk. The Ram is not junk, it's a fine piece of machinery that is supierior to the pre-07 GTM-900 trucks. Sure it's not as good as the new ones now, but it's older so what do you expect? Plus it's still a good truck. The minivan are still the segment leaders asa far as market share and the most innovative (Stow `n Go), and will be redesigned soon. The Caliber is still a compact and is a good car, even wth a plastic interior, plus there's going to be a subcompact at some point soon. The Sebring sedan may be a joke, but the Avnenger looks much better, and the Sebring coupe may be the saving grace of the car. And if it weren't for the LX's...you probably wouldn't be getting your precious Zetas as GM would see no reason to build an RWD platform and would continue to shove V8s in old FWD platforms.
Yeah Chrysler has made some stupid mistakes and bad designs lately, but so has the king of all bad designs and mistakes, GM. You want a joke? How about the current Malibu? The Aztek? The crummy engines in the Equinox, the badge job G5 (no more badge jobs my ass), the SSR (while I like it, it's just as much of a failure as the Prowler was), the Ion when it first came out, and all of the Saturns up to this point for that matter, and all of GM's minivans. The list could go on I'm sure, but that's sufficient.
On another note, I wonder why DCX doesn't push Chrysler further upmarket. Sure it would end up competing with Mercedes, but the profits go to the same place, and they'd probably attract different customers anyway. Plus they'd get higher profits by being able to charge more.