Jump to content
Create New...

Intrepidation

In Hibernation
  • Posts

    22,750
  • Joined

Everything posted by Intrepidation

  1. That sucks, I always liked the Pacifica, and the update makes it even more attractive, with the nicer headlight design, 4.0 V6 and 6-speed auto. Plus I hear the interior is probably the nicest you'll find in a Chrysler. So it's on it's own platform? Just modify it for the next gen...at least then Chrysler has something that's not just a Dodge underneath.
  2. NIce! I can't wait to see a fresh coat of paint and some nice tires on it!
  3. Your Mom couldn't resist
  4. That makes sense, altthough I do ry to take care of my car to the best of my abilities (need to change the oil this week)
  5. Why would you be watching it if it's in gear? Unless it's for the passenger...
  6. Yeah, I get your point. But I still think it should be recognized more, since it is #3 out of 5, and is one of the top sellers in the US market. Hell, at one time it was #3.
  7. I'd give you that before the 2nd gen, but not since the 2nd gen Ram.
  8. Why is it that when everyone talks abou the truck market, they tend to include GM and Ford but not Dodge? Dodge may not sell as much, but it still sells alot and it's plenty competetive. Granted, it's getting older now and probably needs a redesign, but it's no PoS. ls in regards to brand loyalty, Ram owners are also very loyal.
  9. ...Why? Also as a personal preference I hate vehicles lowered that shouldn't be. It's interesting if pointless I guess...but then that's part of what SEMA is about Nice colors btw.
  10. The `93-`97 Prizm looked better an had a nicer interior design IMO. I hate how the stereo is off center with the rest of the center stack.
  11. I'm not worried. the Ram will always have my vote. Like I said, it looks ok but not that great.
  12. Nope, every truck looks better than it besides maybe the Titan...and the new Super Duty. IMO of course.
  13. What's with those interior colors? Makes it look like $h!! The exterior...still sucks, and their "reasoning" behind it is nothing more than a load of crap, just like how "atrists" with no skill pull some meaning out of their ass to justify it.
  14. it's ugly...too bad. The concept sketches looked so promising.
  15. I don't see the need for a GMC version since it's not a real truck. The Outlook makes perfec sense to revolutionize the lineup and replace the Relay.
  16. I actually like teh Tacoma...I think it was spared putridification, oh and the 4Runner.
  17. Meatball subs, with garlic and parmesan cheese.
  18. Light years ahead of the previous model
  19. Both are damn good looking trucks. Makes it all the more apparent how much better the GMT-900s look than the Tundra
  20. Aww, it says the ad is no longer there...I can't see it
  21. I like that red though...nothing else.
  22. Oh God my Eyes!
  23. I saw a Tundra at the Topsfield Fair last month. In person, it looks ok...better than in the pics. That said, The front is awkward...the headlights are just floating there, the design isn't particularly aggressive and it wouldn't look out of place with a Hyundai badge on it. Didn't get to see the interior much though. I'm also not very impressed with Toyota's representatives. I talked to an official one, and he was going on and on about how the Tundra beat the 5.6 liter Hemi Ram.
×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search