freestar had an uncompetitive v6, a 4 speed tranny, cheap plastic, bad interior design, noisy interior, poor third row seat, lacked AWD option, no second row stow. it was an upgrade over the windstar, but fell short of the curve the others had set.
Minivans would be competitive again if they simply got racier with styling, made the interiors a little more driver oriented, and offered AWD. People in charge at places like Ford though are very short sighted business types. They have no ability to see design possibilities and they never want to develop designs or products, the beancounters kill it the first chance they can. That is what overpaid business leaders do, at least in the US. They like to stifle anything that isn't a get rich quick slam dunk.
i doubt the Flex will sell huge, even if i think its interesting and may end up with one. it is a niche vehicle. it may sell more retail units than the freestar. the thing that the flex has the freestar didn't was an up to date powertrain and AWD. I still think Ford should make a new minivan, with sliding doors. It has the platform and the parts. a 'kinetic design' minivan with an engaging interior for the driver and superior 2nd and 3rd row function would be a no brainer. it makes me beyond upset we see once popular huge sellers like the windstar and ranger get their business stolen by the rice groups because the vehicles were not kept fresh.