Jump to content
Create New...

trinacriabob

Members
  • Posts

    11,291
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    145

Everything posted by trinacriabob

  1. I was thinking about the consistency with which I liked GM brands. I was looking through a classic Pontiac magazine at Borders last night. Pontiacs had the most interesting styling, both externally and internally. - My Dad's 70 LeMans coupe (with an inline six) looked better than Cutlass/Skylark/Malibu of the same year. - Except for 77-78, I always liked the Firebird over the Camaro. - The 70s and 80s Cutlass Supremes were cleaner, but the Grand Prix and Grand Le Mans had commendable Pontiac grilles and dashboards. - Pontiac put out nicer full-sizes in the 70s and 80s than did the competition, particularly in 75 and 76 when the Grand Ville and Bonneville sported the 5-spoke Pontiac rally wheels. - The 80s Grand Prix handled a little bit better than did its stablemates. - Lately, the Bonnevilles have been the nicest FWD full-size (2000-2005). - The G8 is outstanding, from every angle. My answer is Pontiac. Next would have been Oldsmobile (for 76-77 Cutlass and 82-84 Cutlass + all Intrigues). Next would have been Buick (for 88-96 Regal coupe and for 08-09 LaCrosse). No Chevrolet or Cadillac products have been of extreme interest to me. What's wrong with my judgment, though? My 2 favorites are no longer around. well, not that funny.
  2. Lower Manhattan
  3. blowhard
  4. working under the table (an expression more so than a word)
  5. I think I say this because the other cars I considered during my last purchase cycle, other than the LaX, looked best in white (IMO): a 2007 Monte Carlo LT with alloys and the upright spoiler a 2008 Grand Prix base sport sedan And cars that I look at today look great in white, though I wouldn't necessarily buy them at this point: the new Mercury Milan the new Lincoln MKS the new Mustang coupe, with its sequential turn signals WOW, to all of them. However, it's always been, when I was in college or living in the ATL, "oh, yeah, Robert drives the blue Cutlass ... or, remember the blue Camaro you had," so I strongly associate the metallic (lighter) blue colors with my first cars. @moltie: absolutely...if I lived in AZ or FL, I would want a white car with a light colored interior...
  6. Boeing 747
  7. always
  8. Very appealing and also unique...a great color for this car...too bad there was no blue interior to go with it...
  9. White is usually effective in showing off a car's good lines... be it a G8, a new Camaro, the last-run of the MC, etc.
  10. insomnia
  11. Ok, so I'll be a curmudgeon, what kind of people personally annoy you (thread readers) in the workplace, or at your school? I've had more criticism that I've had answers, so please feel free to vent.
  12. sweaty palms
  13. It's been a while since we've polled on this...and we usually do it in poll form. So without a poll, pick ONE car color that you could apply to any and all of the cars you like. You can pick: ( a ) color, ( b ) basic depth - light, medium or dark, ( c ) metallic or enamel No need to describe your back-up...just ONE. My pick: Light Metallic Blue Why that choice? Both of the Cutlass Supremes and the Camaro I had were this color. I think it worked on all the cars I've owned, or would consider owning. Unfortunately, Glacier Blue Metallic was no longer a 2008 offering on LaCrosse, or I would have picked it. Why the poll? I went to my local B-(P)-C-GM and looked at the color choices for Cadillac...there was no more Ice Blue Metallic...not even on the more traditional DTS...
  14. Cute dog. How old (remembering I have to "multiply by 7"). Any time that someone jokes around about spiking someone's food, I think of the scene in "The Pope of Greenwich Village" where Mickey Rourke and/or Eric Roberts spike the a-hole cop's food with horse laxative. Though generally a dire movie, that scene was funny and "Summer Wind" is one of the (only) two Sinatra songs I like.
  15. detest
  16. Well, all Italians like a little bit of drama, but, what I find, as a common denominator, is that I have a big problem with people who make other people their "project." Those kinds of people, fortunately, are the minority. Plus, the jerk is a UCLA grad...you think that could be part of the problem?
  17. Wish I could help, DF. In 98 or 99, the firm I was working for got new chairs. The bastard owner was going to go on the cheap, but we ended up with $300 dollar chairs because some of us did the "you must be kidding" routine. Don't remember the manufacturer, or I'd tell you, but they more than paid for themselves in terms of comfort and increased productivity. So, my advice, if it goes over your price point by a little bit and you like the chair, buy the chair.
  18. anger management
  19. wood
  20. ace in the hole
  21. Makes me all that more determined to drive an American car, which I like anyway. And I thrive on being a nonconformist to begin with. I was thinking about these characters at work, anyway...the common denominator is that they are male or female versions of Mrs. Kravitz on "Bewitched" (for those who remember either the original or the re-runs......."Abner, Abner...")
  22. Scarface ("...look at you now") actually more disgusting than funny
  23. Coca Cola from Atlanta Georgia
  24. Pensacola FL
  25. 007, it's that he spends TOO much time dwelling on what I say and do...during meetings or group sessions, I catch him studying/glaring at me and others notice it, too, and pull me aside afterward to point this out. But, back to the question, do you folks have people that are WAY too invested in what others are doing on a non-work level?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search