Jump to content
Create New...

RCD

Members
  • Posts

    11
  • Joined

  • Last visited

RCD's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

0

Reputation

  1. From what I have seen of what he writes, I doubt it. That site is quite supportive of current management.
  2. Not to disagree with everything Flint said but I do believe that there is indeed a perception problem. Here is some evidence that it at least exists: http://www.friendsofbuick.com/about.html Scroll to the question "What is the Perception Gap?" Long but worth the read.
  3. Here's the only mention I could find of it: http://www.friendsofbuick.com/news/07-20-2006.html Not a GM site, but still...
  4. from http://www.friendsofbuick.com/news/07-07-2006.html:
  5. I thought this was interesting. The Truth About Cars reviewed the Lucerne at http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=1646. Someone from a site called Friends Of Buick questioned parts of the review in the comments section below it and wrote pages on the Lucerne and its quality, ride and handling. Long but worth a read. Does anybody here own a Lucerne? It is the first Buick I have thought about buying in some time and I would like to hear what the owners think of it.
  6. I will be the first to admit that the GT of the Mid 90's had some problems, however not counting the Cobra because it was SVT would be comparable to not counting the Camaro SS because it was SLP tuned. I hope that GM has the business smarts to involve SLP in the new Camaro when it comes on line. It is still hard to imagine GM without a Camaro, and it is just as difficult to imagine a Camaro line without the SS. As far as the Camaro always being faster than the Mustang, shall I remind you of the restricted 3rd gens. However if the world can forgive Ford for the Mustang II and the King Cobra, then GM can be forgiven for taming down their third Gens for emmissions and fuel sake.
  7. late 90's Camaro to an older Mustang, possible. Did the GT have a stick, was the GT in gear, did it have a driver that knew how to drive, did it have a driver at all. These are important questions I would have about your race with the GT. I think it is more probable that Camaro drivers hate Mustang Drivers more due to the fact That Mustang Drivers can still buy Mustangs, and Camaro drivers will have to hold their breath till 2009. I on the other hand, do not hate Camaros or their drivers and I am sincere when I say I really want the Camaro back....The Mustang can not last forever when it is in a class of its own, and regardless if the Mustang meets the Camaro or the Camaro meets the Mustang, both drivers will have fun. So if you are either a fan of the Mustang or Camaro buy it (Camaro drivers will have a little wait). Atleast they are both American. Lets face facts I would much rather race a new Camaro than any vehicle that consumes rice for fuel, I know I don't want to waste my time on the track.
  8. as I was reading the automobear sight that is going around I found a very indepth article on the GMT900s they had some great pics. http://www.automobear.com/TheNewGMT900s.html
  9. I do have a Cobra, it and its road manners are very livable, and it awaits the new Camaro with great anticipation !!! please bring your choice of rides to detroit it would be fun.
  10. Meet me in Detroit there is a first time for everything, But I am still inspired by the comeback of muscle cars, and even more so the Camaro, the Mustang-Camaro Rivalry is as important as the University of Michigan - Ohio State rivalry, but even more so.
  11. I am a Mustang Driver, and I am not sorry nor do I regret my purchase, but I am delighted that GM is bringing back the Camaro, the Mustang has never been the same since it lost the chance to eat Camaros for lunch. Now that the Camaro is coming back the Mustang will eat once again!!!
×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search