BrewSwillis

If they had cutouts, then they would either have to have two diferent rear clips, or single exhaust vehicles with an unused cutout......as there will be a single exhaust version 2.4L I-4.

2007 Chrysler Aspen $38,610 That's only $42687.22 Canadian.........which is nowhere near $60K.

More: My parents have one, and they love it! The interior is very nice. Much nicer than any Honda or Toyota. They have not had any problems with it.....NONE. It's only been back to the dealership for oil changes. Comparing the Pacifica to the Pilot is not very reasonable. The Pilot is Honda's only mid to large SUV (and the Pacifia is an AWD crossover). You should really be comparing the Pilot sales to the sales of the: Pacifica, Jeep GC, Jeep Commander, and Dodge Durango combined. The Pacifica is a niche vehicle. It's obvious that you know nothing about the Pacifica, and are just talking $h!. You can just say that you don't like instead of trying to create a bunch of reasons why it sucks. Want to talk about failures? What about the multi award winning Honda Ridgeline? Those things are selling like 55,000 a year? That's roughly 65,000 less than the sales dud Pacifica!

"Same sales dud"......huh? The Pacifica has sold 29,235 vehicles through April of this year. Last year through April the Pacfica had sold 27,496 units. I don't have the total numbers handy for last year, but for this year, if you use the almost 30,000 vehicles for the first four months of the year.......that projects out to roughly 120,000 vehicles this year. Sales dud?? Source: http://www.allpar.com/forums/index.php?act...ype=post&id=799

As was already stated by the Chrysler group a few years back (when the LX's came out); they prefer "love it or hate it" designs, to designs that try to cater to everybody......because people who love it, will purchase one even without incentives.....and people who hate it probably wouldn't have had any intention of purchasing one anyway. Why try and win over people who are not even potential customers?

Already being discussed here: http://www.cheersandgears.com/forums/index...?showtopic=9043

Additional pictures here: http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Gener...icleId=115533#2 You can see the dual exhausts and badging for the new 4.0L!

It's not nice calling Paul Lienert a woman! ........oh, you meant Anita

They were going for the look of the Airflite's C-pillar: I believe the "Chrysler" is spelled out because this is a euro spec vehicle. Just look at the size of the license plate.

Ding ding ding........We have a winner! That's the perfect way to put it. In fact, I could use that analogy to suggest that the Camaro is even more retro than the Challenger, because the Challenger is an evolution of it's last production model......and the Camaro has abandoned it's evolutionary styling to go back to a style from 1969.

Well, you can get 17's on a MINI

It's not arguing about personal preference. It arguing about the Camaro being just as retro as the Challenger. I love the Camaro almost as much as I love the Challenger......and I love them both because they are retro!!

Shouldn't it be Fpoon.......the Fit Spoon?? Sorry....too many Wendy's commercials!!

I belong to PETA.........People Eating The Animals!

It's good to see Honda bucking the "big wheel" trend, and going back to 13's! Rollin on 13's.......what what! /they're probably not 13's......but they sure look like it in that picture.

Except for the things that are different......those two cars are "exactly" the same too!

The rear end is kinda "out there". Chrysler is really trying to be different with the little things like badging placement. I guess they were going for a crossfire resemblence. http://www.autospies.com/article/index.asp...7&categoryId=12

Now which is the new one? ?.....I just can't tell

The concept car was the 6.L, and was called an R/T. The SRT-8 (or SRT-10 ) Challenger could be a version of the 392 ci HEMI crate engine that they showed at NAIAS, or a Viper engine for an SRT-10??

How do you plan on passing a 6 speed 425 HP Challenger with a 350 HP Camaro???

A total stripper model for only fourteen hundreds bucks less??? Now it's confirmed that Toyota knows we're stupid. There's no way someone would buy that if they didn't plan on changing it all anyway.......and even then, $1400 is a drop in the bucket of the cost of redoing everything.

Stock Wheel/Tire Sizes: * 14 x ? in., P195/70 R14 * 15 x 6 in., P195/65 R15 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Wheel Sizes: Diameter: 14" - 18" should fit with no trouble. (Some 14" wheels may not clear the brake calipers.) * 19" takes a little work. * 20" requires serious work, although it has been done by at least 2 members. Width: 6" - 7.5" should be OK. * 7" is generally a better choice than 7.5", but many people are running 7.5" with no trouble at all. Lug Pattern: 5 x 100 mm Wheel Offset: + 38-42 mm should fit fine. Anything else may not. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Tire Size - What the numbers mean: P 195 / 70 R 14 P - Passenger Car Tire 195 - Tread Width (in mm) 70 - Sidewall Height (% of Tire Width) R - Radial Tire 14 - Wheel diameter Helpful tips from jhrody about changing your tire size: To calculate the 'right' size tire for your aftermarket wheels, use the Miata Tire Calculator. Tire Sizes for 17" Wheels: * 205/50 R17 [speedo 0.01% fast] * 215/45 R17 [speedo 0.53% fast] * 225/45 R17 [speedo 0.9% slow] It sounds like 215 mm is the best maximum tire width for a cloud car. Anything larger may rub. http://www.stratusphere.net/forums/Tires_Suspension-f43.html

DAMN!! Did you hear that thing?? f@#kin sick!!

Sorry, I can't really help you.....but I think you would get a good accurate answer here: http://www.stratusphere.net/

I would say that they've finally taken the final step to becomming a fully American company.......they have a highly publicized sexual harrassment suit! What's more American than that??