Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    An Alliance Is Formed: GM Buys 7% Stake Into PSA Peugeot Citroën


    William Maley

    Editor/Reporter - CheersandGears.com

    February 29, 2012

    The rumor of GM and PSA Peugeot Citroën creating an alliance for the past couple of weeks is now true. Today, the two announced a new global alliance in which GM will buy a 7% stake in PSA.

    The alliance would have GM and PSA sharing vehicle platforms, components and modules. Plus, the alliance would give both stronger purchasing power for sourcing components, raw materials and other goods and services. The vehicle platforms in question are will be small and midsize passenger cars, MPVs and crossovers, with the first one arriving by 2016.

    GM says that results from the alliance will save approximately $2 billion annually within about five years.

    Still, analysts and investors are still wondering why GM & PSA are teaming up.

    Press Release is on Page 2


    GM and PSA Peugeot Citroën Create Global Alliance

    Long-term strategic pairing to leverage combined scale and strengths

    NEW YORK – General Motors and PSA Peugeot Citroën today announced the creation of a long-term and broad-scale global strategic alliance that will leverage the combined strengths and capabilities of the two companies, contribute to the profitability of both partners and strongly improve their competitiveness in Europe.

    The alliance is structured around two main pillars: the sharing of vehicle platforms, components and modules; and the creation of a global purchasing joint venture for the sourcing of commodities, components and other goods and services from suppliers with combined annual purchasing volumes of approximately $125 billion. Each company will continue to market and sell its vehicles independently and on a competitive basis.

    Beyond these pillars, the alliance creates a flexible foundation that allows the companies to pursue other areas of cooperation.

    In connection with the alliance, PSA Peugeot Citroën is expected to raise approximately €1 billion through a capital increase with preferential subscription rights for shareholders of PSA Peugeot Citroën, underwritten by a syndicate of banks and including an investment from the Peugeot Family Group, as a sign of its confidence in the success of the alliance. As part of the agreement, which includes no specific provision regarding the governance of PSA Peugeot Citroën, GM plans to acquire a 7 percent equity stake in PSA Peugeot Citroën, making it the second-largest shareholder behind the Peugeot Family Group.

    “This partnership brings tremendous opportunity for our two companies,” said Dan Akerson, GM chairman and CEO. “The alliance synergies, in addition to our independent plans, position GM for long-term sustainable profitability in Europe.”

    Philippe Varin, chairman of the managing board of PSA Peugeot Citroën, declared, “This alliance is a tremendously exciting moment for both groups and this partnership is rich in its development potential. With the strong support of our historical shareholder and the arrival of a new and prestigious shareholder, the whole group is mobilized to reap the full benefit of this agreement.”

    Under the terms of the agreement, GM and PSA Peugeot Citroën will share selected platforms, modules and components on a worldwide basis in order to achieve cost savings, gain efficiencies, leverage volumes and advanced technologies and reduce emissions. Sharing of platforms not only enables global applications, it also permits both companies to execute Europe-specific programs with scale and in a cost-effective manner.

    Initially, GM and PSA Peugeot Citroën intend to focus on small and midsize passenger cars, MPVs and crossovers. The companies will also consider developing a new common platform for low emission vehicles. The first vehicle on a common platform is expected to launch by 2016.

    This alliance enhances but does not replace either company’s ongoing independent efforts to return their European operations to sustainable profitability.

    The purchasing cooperation defined in the agreement allows the companies to act as one global purchasing organization when it comes to sourcing commodities, components and services from suppliers, taking full advantage of the joint expertise, volume, platforms and standardized parts. Combining GM’s robust global processes and organizational structure with best practices from PSA Peugeot Citroën will bring significant value and efficiencies to the purchasing operations at both companies.

    Additionally, the alliance is exploring areas for further cooperation, such as integrated logistics and transportation. To this end, GM intends to establish a strategic, commercial cooperation with Gefco, an integrated logistics services company and subsidiary of PSA Peugeot Citroën, whereby Gefco would provide logistics services to GM in Europe and Russia.

    The total synergies expected from the alliance are estimated at approximately $2 billion USD annually within about five years. The synergies will largely coincide with new vehicle programs, with limited benefit expected in the first two years. It is expected the synergies will be shared about evenly between the two companies.

    The alliance will be supervised by a global steering committee that includes an equal number of senior leader representatives from each company.

    Its implementation is subject to requisite regulatory approvals in certain jurisdictions as well as notification to the appropriate workers councils.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    I think this GM Europe will be the ones mostly affected by this. The only way this affects us here on this side of the pond is that the next iteration of Malibu/Cruze/Sonic et. al could be riding on something that Peugeot/Citroen had a hand in designing. I don't see either making a Fiat-esque return to the US.

    Ultimately this sends a strong message to GME - we've found your potential replacement, so shape up or else....

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Chrysler has Fiat, Nissan has Renault. PSA + GM is not bad if GM wants to expand into that portion of Europe. Perhaps at some point, Opel becomes a sub brand of PSA and that is the way to shed Opel......

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    After researching, I think I am giving a cautious yes to this idea for the following reasons:

    1. Financially I think investing in PSA means GM leveraging PSA than other ways around like how Dr. Z leveraged Chrysler.
    2. Logistically platform and engine sharing means better control over suppliers.
    3. Market wise, give heartburn to VW close to its own battle grounds, who thinks it is indestructible and also keep Toyota under check.
    4. Politically put some fire beneath German government and unions which have been real hard to negotiate.

    • Agree 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I have to agree on the leverage on the Germans. This could be a good bargining chip.

    As for sharing platforms . Peugeot will get help with better and new platforms and GM will leverage it out over a greater number of models. This should help lower the cost per unit they build and increase profits.

    Better product for Peugeot and lower unit cost for GM. I see no down side with only 7% investment. I am sure GM has this also set that they can pull out easily.

    Right now GM is all about incresed profits and this will help in Europe where profits were very hard to come by. With the loss of Saab and the Fiat/Alfa shared platforms GM was not sharing as much as they used to in Europe.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I have to agree on the leverage on the Germans. This could be a good bargining chip.

    As for sharing platforms . Peugeot will get help with better and new platforms and GM will leverage it out over a greater number of models. This should help lower the cost per unit they build and increase profits.

    Better product for Peugeot and lower unit cost for GM. I see no down side with only 7% investment. I am sure GM has this also set that they can pull out easily.

    Right now GM is all about incresed profits and this will help in Europe where profits were very hard to come by. With the loss of Saab and the Fiat/Alfa shared platforms GM was not sharing as much as they used to in Europe.

    +1

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Z made the best points I just agreed for the most part. The Leverage part with the Germans is one I never considered till he pointed it out. I will give him a plus one for that one!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    They could platform share the Peugeot RCZ right into Chevy dealerships and I wouldn't complain. The Citroen C1 and Peugeot 107 would share with the Spark. The Peugoet 206+ and Citroen C3 - C3 Picasso could ride with the Chevy Sonic. Peugeot 308 and Citroen C4 line are a dead ringer for the Cruze platform. The Peugeot 508 and Citroen C5 and C6 go on Epsilon II. Peugeot 407, which is in major need of a makeover could go on Alpha.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Actually there is more synergy like you pointed out than originally perceived because both companies are so vastly different yet play in the same sand box in some key segments. The alliance can really cause a major heartburn to Germans, Japanese and Korean manufacturers and I like the secondary competitiveness it creates for market share.

    Drew and I were talking at Detroit show about consolidation of auto manufacturers in EU and China in next 5 years. Honestly we were expecting EU companies to duke it out not GM coming in. This is the first major move in the middlegame.

    I also like how there are no commitment terms unlike the Fiat fiasco last decade. The Italians docked GM for $2B+ in cash, which honestly saved Fiat from bankruptcy. Obama and Chrysler should thank GM indirectly.

    Frankly the news came so fast that people are still grasping on to the impact that's why no "editorials" or "expert opnions" are flying off at-random. I give credit to Ackerson's team here.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I thnk this is a good example where the money guys are not all bad. Like it or not there is a need for good finance people in a company the problem is not all of them are that good. I think GM right now has a good mix and they are working together well.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Posts

    • Very cool read and video on how Tires are made. Where Are Michelin Tires Made And Who Owns The Brand?
    • This is an interesting read. Korea is the only country with EVs that are head-to-head with China and in some ways better. This nanotube technology will allow Korea to move way farther forward than the U.S. in automotive options. Advances in carbon nanotube applications enhance battery dry process
    • I got a better idea for Trump: Instead of Canada becoming the 51st state, Id prefer for the US to become Canada's 4rth Territory.  Not even province status. In order for the United Stated Territories of America to become a full blown province, Americans would have to prove their allegiance and loyalty to the Royalty of King Charles the Third since Canada is a Federal Parliamentary Constitutional Monarchy of the British Commonwealth realm.  Trump's job and title would be a perfect revival for an old tradition.  King Charles the Third's court jester. And we could throw him a bone...and have a playing card named after him since he likes those kinds of things    
    • Im glad to get that off my chest  
    • This is what Andy Palmer said, the dude of what the article in the link is about.     "Hybrids are a road to hell. They are a transition strategy, and the longer you stay on that transition, the less quickly you ramp up into the new world," Palmer said. "If you just delay transitioning to EVs by diluting it with hybrids then you are more uncompetitive for longer, and you allow the Chinese to continue to develop their market and their leadership. I honestly think it's a fool's errand," he added.   And him being the dude that helped engineer the Nissan Leaf and was later the dude in charge of Nissan's EV department, I am 100% in agreement with him.  And I would also like to add: The Chinese government pushed and pushed hard for EVs.  Pushed hard not only on the global stage but MOSTLY got ALL Chinese people ON BOARD with EVs.  They had several reasons to do so.  China has lots and lots of minerals and important ingredients to make said batteries. An essential part of EV transition.  But most IMPORTANTLY, China WANTS to REPLACE the USA for being the defacto country  in political, social, economical influence in the world that the USA enjoyed since the end of WW2 in 1945.  And since they knew they lacked behind in ebery metric that would push them to that status, they had only one move to make. It was a Hail Mary pass, but kit was to dominate in the the tech world and it happened to be in the automobile realm. EVs. And while China was seeking to dominate in this arena, and CAREFULLY nurtured it, the USA phoqued themselves over.  Idiot Americans were fooled to believe ALL the negative commentary on EVs. Uneducated morons liked the drill baby drill commentary. Smart but greedy fools failed to see what was coming next and failed even further to see the threat that is China and ITS technological breakthroughs.  ALL from morons that had biased reasons to be anti-EV. From the Joe Rogans and Alex Jones of the world that thrive from clicks for the podcast youtube and other shytty platforms to anti-EV biases from Big Oil.  And lastly, stupid politicians that failed American citizens in different decades from keeping Americans poor and stupid by not giving them educations. By PURPOSELY DEFUNDING the American school system, by PURPOSELY lying to them on DIFFERENT subjects and while these American politicians were greedily looking to make America into a fascist, oligarch world, they failed to see and acknowledge the OTHER threats the world was giving to the US OTHER than the war threats.  The technological warfare.   Exactly the OPPOSITE of what the Chinese regimes were on about EVs.  And if Trump decides to cut EV subsidies, even of only to allow Tesla to sell, the Chinese are building European factories to build EVs there. Slowly.  They are FLOODING the market with Chinese EVs as we speak in Europe.  The next step is to flood North America with Chinese EVs. The starting point IS Mexico.  If one is educated, one could see the disaster that is to come for GM, Ford.  Stellantis is going to get the disaster first in Europe.  Chinese EVs are going to flood Mexico.  INEXPENSIVE Chinese EVs.  Then WILL come the factories in Mexico.  So much for the "NOBODY WANTS EVs" rhetoric that the uneducated, wrongfully informed Americans (and Canadians to some degree) keep on spewing...   Its really IS a big deal. I SEE that rhetoric play about the failure of VW and Stellantis and even GM when these fools squeal about how they are failing because they have put all their monies on EVs.  The thing is, they didnt put their monies FAST enough on EVs and also concetrated on producing ICEVs when they should have just NIXED them waaaay before.  Of course that is Monday morning quarterbacking from me as I say that, but I ALSO saw the writing on the wall about EVs being THE future.  Had Americans NOT been LIED to about this whole thing about scare tactics about EVs, GM and Ford would have ALL the working EVs RIGHT NOW not ONLY to shut down Tesla, but to even shut down Chinese EVs. Elon Musk could have TAKEN China ALL to himself if he was 5% the visionary he thinks he is.   But he was too busy STILL selling us on colonizing Mars...  Whatever happened to that super loop thing anyway?  Yeah...a billion dollar boondoggle that had everybody fooled.  Chinese politicians, engineers and all around smart folk must be STILL laughing at all the gullible Americans and greedy fools that the US has churned out the last 15 years...    But hey...   Now lets keep on shopping because its the Christmas season and we should all consume because its good for the economy while we wait for tariffs to hit us because Canada and Mexico reasons, because our eggs are expensive while we get fleeced by insurance companies but we dont want healthcare because communism and education education education but Ivy Leaguers  they too smart so they elitist but Democrats wanting to forgive student debt no good but keep on having insanely expensive school tuitions while other areas in the country and young folk not having ACCESS to an education while calling some countries of the world as shytehole countries while ALSO keep on having school shootings because teachers arent packing but also those shytehole country folk  are eating the dogs and they are eating the cats.  
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search