Jump to content
Create New...

2006 SSR Gets New Paint, More Power


Recommended Posts

Posted

2006 Chevy SSR featuring the custom-look two-tone paint scheme of Smokin' Asphalt over Ricochet Silver. Horsepower is increased to 400 with six-speed transmission and 395 with automatic.

Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image

Posted

That is a super nice colour combo. Too bad the SSR is so expensive it would be nice to see more of these machines around.

[post="593"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]


Well you can take all the ones from Michigan, mmkay? ;)
Posted

That looks pretty good actually. I wonder if Chevy will do any special edition HHR's.

[post="632"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]


Hopefully not one to match every PT. They'd be going on for years...
Posted
hrm. fancy retro convertible built on existing chassis. sales low due to high price and lower power than expected. to boost sales company adds more power and special edition paint jobs. chevy ssr -or- plymouth prowler ??? funny how they are following the same path. both cars that are beautiful and i will never have.
Posted
At first when I saw the SSR, I didn't like it at all, but it has grown on me. GM is trying to sell it as a "limited edition, halo-type vehicle" so no major changes will be made I'm sure...but...Imagine this: Get rid of the retractable hardtop. Make it just a regular cabin like a truck. That will allow it to have a traditional, usable bed, a couple hundred lbs less weight, and I'm sure a few thousand less dollars in price. That is something I would be interested in. A cool looking, slightly more usable, performance oriented Hot-rod truck that costs less than the current SSR due to no retractable hard top.
Posted

At first when I saw the SSR, I didn't like it at all, but it has grown on me.

GM is trying to sell it as a "limited edition, halo-type vehicle" so no major changes will be made I'm sure...but...Imagine this:  Get rid of the retractable hardtop. Make it just a regular cabin like a truck.  That will allow it to have a traditional, usable bed, a couple hundred lbs less weight, and I'm sure a few thousand less dollars in price.

That is something I would be interested in.  A cool looking, slightly more usable, performance oriented Hot-rod truck that costs less than the current SSR due to no retractable hard top.

[post="910"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]


ASC did just that, and added more power too. I think they called it "Razorback" - if memory serves. Similar paint scheme too.
Posted
I just noticed the little GM badge on this guy. When will GM come to its senses? As for the paint scheme, this combo does add to the retro theme and maybe even adds a touch of class. It won't be to everybody's taste, though.
Posted

They need to put the SSR on a diet! Why not build the next SSR on GMT 355. or an extended Kappa to minimize the weight..

[post="886"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]



Agreed, it's too heavy. I really doubt it will be around for more than
a few more years.
Posted

Agreed, it's too heavy. I really doubt it will be around for more than
a few more years.

[post="1564"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]


It was always meant to be a short production run . If you count the '06, it will have had only three full years of production(the '03s are very few) and that's what GM was talking about at the start. Hopefully a new El Camino will quickly follow in the SSR's wake.

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search