Jump to content
Create New...

Recommended Posts

Posted

Autoblog Ural Review Story

ural-electric-prototype-sidecar-motorcyc

Lets get the details out of the way first for the Bike riders.

  • 60 Horsepower
  • 81 pound-feet of torque
  • weight 822 lbs
  • top speed 88 mph
  • Range 103 miles per charge on the 19.5 kWh battery pack
  • Recharge time 13 hours on a 110 wall outlet

Now Ural sells bikes here in America and while some here might say what a wimpy electric motor, the electric bike is very fast as the ICE bikes only have 41 HP and 42 lb-ft of torque. So the EV is a big gain over traditional ICE bikes. To quote the CEO, this bike accelerates very quickly from a hard launch for a Ural.

Ural Electric Prototype sidecar motorcycle

Ural Electric Prototype sidecar motorcycle

Currently these bikes are being developed here in Washington.

ural-electric-prototype-sidecar-motorcyc

ural-electric-prototype-sidecar-motorcyc

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Windstorm said:

That's lovely!

Agreed, it is an awesome bike that I can so see being popular not just on rural day trips but in the inner city. Talk about easy to get around with no smell.

Posted (edited)

For 15-20k I would never consider something like this. 

 

Triumph Street Triple

For Less than 10k, 112hp, 54tq, 53mpg, it is fuel efficient enough for me.

 

Street Triple.jpg

Edited by ccap41
Posted

Yes, 15-20k for a basically utility electric bike is way too much.   Also, it lost 2WD so will be not as good off-road as the original.  

It is cool for the novelty aspect but that's about it.

If anything I would take the original one, even though it is also overpriced at $12-14k if I am not mistaken,

Posted
12 minutes ago, ykX said:

Yes, 15-20k for a basically utility electric bike is way too much.   Also, it lost 2WD so will be not as good off-road as the original.  

It is cool for the novelty aspect but that's about it.

If anything I would take the original one, even though it is also overpriced at $12-14k if I am not mistaken,

This is very confusing to me:

"A two-wheel-drive Gear Up runs $16,499"

"And Ural fanatics may very well be disappointed that this EV is powered by a single wheel with no option for on-demand power from the sidecar wheel."

Posted (edited)
28 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

This is very confusing to me:

"A two-wheel-drive Gear Up runs $16,499"

"And Ural fanatics may very well be disappointed that this EV is powered by a single wheel with no option for on-demand power from the sidecar wheel."

In the original Ural there a link from the bike's rear wheel to the sidecar's wheel, making it a 2WD bike.  This makes it to handle off-road (or bad unpaved roads) very well, something that is important in rural Russia.

2014_Ural_Gear-Up_River.jpg

2010-Ural-GearUpa.jpg

Edited by ykX
Posted
53 minutes ago, ykX said:

In the original Ural there a link from the bike's rear wheel to the sidecar's wheel, making it a 2WD bike.  This makes it to handle off-road (or bad unpaved roads) very well, something that is important in rural Russia.

2014_Ural_Gear-Up_River.jpg

2010-Ural-GearUpa.jpg

Oh yeah, I knew what the 2WD was for. I was just saying the wording was funny because within the same paragraph it says you can get 2WD and it also says you cannot get that on the EV Ural. 

Posted

Speaking of 2WD motorcycles, I remember reading about one a long time ago called the Rokon Ranger or similar...really rugged for off road...one Car & Driver article claimed it could climb trees...

Posted
2 hours ago, Robert Hall said:

Speaking of 2WD motorcycles, I remember reading about one a long time ago called the Rokon Ranger or similar...really rugged for off road...one Car & Driver article claimed it could climb trees...

Rokon Scout and Ranger, amazingly they have front wheel powered.

Rokon-Trail-Breaker-action-7-590x393.jpg

Rokon-Trail-Breaker-Dirt-Bike-01.jpg

Posted

If I'm buying old-school and retro I'm buying something like this. 

Royal Enfield2034178455_RoyalEnfield1.jpg.17155e01871998286f26c9966393dde5.jpg909151887_RoyalEnfield2.jpg.c312dbf37ff38fe63c2dc69398e9c974.jpg508172615_RoyalEnfield3.jpg.f8fbcdbd7b985dec19e7d5bfc9b334b7.jpg2064771429_RoyalEnfield4.jpg.90af69ce38aa2ebd18da4a098af2997e.jpg

"Royal Enfield was quick to point out that the bike, as it stands, is a concept and not slated for production. It's still made out of feasible parts, and the badging appears to show that the engine in it is a new 838cc v-twin with oil cooling, rumored to be based on a collaboration with Polaris. "

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search