Jump to content
Create New...

Recommended Posts

Posted

Before the new Corolla hatchback hits dealers later this summer, Toyota has revealed pricing and fuel economy numbers.

The base SE will set you back $20,910 (includes a $920 destination charge), while the XSE begins at $23,910. That will net you a new 2.0L four-cylinder with 168 horsepower and a six-speed manual. A CVT is available for an additional $1,100.

This is what you get on either trim:

  • SE:  Toyota Safety Sense 2.0 with automatic emergency braking with pedestrian detection, adaptive cruise control, and lane departure warning; 8-inch touchscreen with Apple CarPlay compatibility, and 16-inch wheels.
  • XSE: 18-inch wheels, LED fog lamps, upgraded infotainment system, leather-and-fabric upholstery, and heated front seats. 

As for fuel economy, the SE with the CVT is the mileage leader with EPA estimates of 32 City/42 Highway/36 Combined. The XSE CVT is next with figures of 30/38/33. For the manual, Toyota only has figures for the SE which are 28/37/31. Numbers on the XSE manual are coming soon.

Source: Toyota


View full article

Posted
2 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

give it a 0.33 inch lift, slap some cladding on it, Matrix Returns.

You are so right, This could easily pass for an updated Matrix or Pontiac Vibe! :P 

  • Haha 1
Posted
12 hours ago, riviera74 said:

No need for a Matrix when Toyota already has the RAV4 built on the same platform.

You must not have gotten the memo. Every brand needs 14 crossovers with only 2 inch difference between them in size

  • Haha 2
  • Agree 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

You must not have gotten the memo. Every brand needs 14 crossovers with only 2 inch difference between them in size

Sounds rather wasteful, especially when gas prices are already up 30 cents in a month and will probably get more expensive for the rest of summer.  The real question is whether the crossover thing will peter out if gas prices breach $4 a gallon just like SUVs did in 2008 and the culling began apace.

  • Agree 1
Posted
50 minutes ago, riviera74 said:

Sounds rather wasteful, especially when gas prices are already up 30 cents in a month and will probably get more expensive for the rest of summer.  The real question is whether the crossover thing will peter out if gas prices breach $4 a gallon just like SUVs did in 2008 and the culling began apace.

But we’re assured that is what people want

  • Haha 2
Posted (edited)

Well you should have seen me yesterday trying to haul some PVC picket fence sections in my Compass.  Just call me Jed Clampett.  Only a n00b would get rid of a pickup truck in the name of 8 MPG.

 

Edited by ocnblu
  • Haha 3
Posted (edited)
On 5/26/2018 at 7:19 AM, Drew Dowdell said:

You must not have gotten the memo. Every brand needs 14 crossovers with only 2 inch difference between them in size

That is correct, plus a luxury brand with another 14 crossovers that are 2 inches apart.   The car buying public will not be satisfied until Toyota/Lexus has 50 crossovers to pick from.

As far as the Corolla goes, this looks pretty ugly, the sedan looks better, and the sedan isn't winning any design awards either.

Edited by smk4565
Posted
14 hours ago, balthazar said:

Ask yourself this : When CUV sales were nowhere- did toyoyo/lexus have 50 sedans/coupe to chose from?

That isn’t how it works, it is commonly know that every sedan made by every manufacturer in the past 20 years loses money and every crossover makes at least $10,000 profit.  This statement hangs on the wall of auto execs around the world.

Posted

Sure that's how it works. Plus, at one point, sedans made $10K profit per and all CUVs lost money.

Or not.

As usual, discussing automotive trends is nearly impossible to separate the wheat from the chaff.

Posted

Trends come and go, some types of vehicles are popular at various points in time.  What is popular today may not be popular in 5 years.  Reality occurs. 

Posted (edited)

I like this car. It’s got a decent little motor, NO EcoTurbo bull shyte; and finally Toyota has stylistically a vehicle with effort on design even though it’s still more ‘meh’ than the new Focus, incumbent Cruze, Civic hatch and the Elantra GT.

And I hope it sells like crazy just to prove that Dearborn when it comes to cars has made forever only retarded decisions.

Edited by Suaviloquent
  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)

That was a bit cheeky and trolling by me. Yes. Of course Dearborn has made great cars before!

 

and all automakers do have bad periods, we all know unintended acceleration and the massive recalls that Toyota has. 

 

Panther cars made for badass cop cars and the Mustang is good, but yeah I just had to find some kind of new dig against them, same with General Moronics.

 

my biggest mistake is that in my view I hold domestic makes to higher standards, because I believe they can be much better if they weren’t so short sighted.

Edited by Suaviloquent
  • Thanks 1
Posted
On 5/26/2018 at 7:19 AM, Drew Dowdell said:

You must not have gotten the memo. Every brand needs 14 crossovers with only 2 inch difference between them in size

Including MINI

Guest potluck
Posted

I am sure these will be getting in my way when I am trying to drive. at least I won't have to look at that ugly face

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search