Jump to content
Create New...

Maserati to Lead FCA's Push For Electric Vehicles :Comments


William Maley

Recommended Posts

Fiat Chrysler Automobiles' CEO Sergio Marchionne made a surprise announcement during the company's second-quarter earnings calls last week. The company is planning to have more than half of its lineup to have electrified powertrains by 2022. Leading the charge will be Maserati which will offer some sort of electrified powertrain (hybrid and electric-only).

What caused Marchionne, a person who hasn't been a fan of electric vehicles for quite a while, to change his tune? A lot of it has to do the various emission scandals on diesel vehicles.

"What has really made the issue absolutely mandatory now is the fate of diesel … especially in Europe. Some type of electrification on gas engines is inevitable," said Marchionne.

Also, the announcement of some European countries announcing bans of gas and diesel vehicles in the coming years caused a change of heart for FCA.

“We [FCA] have been reluctant to embrace that avenue until we saw clearer the path forward," said Marchionne.

There are issues for FCA's electrified future as the variable production costs for various components (batteries, electric motors, etc) will not come down quickly. To shoulder these costs, Maserati will take the lead on this initiative.

"When it completes the development of its next two models, it will effectively switch all of its portfolio to electrification," said Marchionne.

"It's an integral part of the development of all of the group." 

Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required), Autocar


View full article

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Idiot, :duh: You could see the writing on the wall long ago and should have had a plan by now for this not waiting to the last minute. This also tells me he will continue to ignore the american brands as long as he can steal all the profits with outdated products.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have my own stories about FCA...

It starts like this

 

In the year 2021...it is Judgement Day for FCA...blah blah blah...bankrupt....blah blah blah...Jeep sold to the highest bidder....blah blah blah...its a bloody shame...many storied names gone because of one carpet bagging, snake oil salesman buffoon...

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, FAPTurbo said:

only a dozen people in north america know of the maserati brand and they'd all buy tesla's anyways.

so i guess sergio wants to lose money on an electrified vehicle again?

Indeed!

6 minutes ago, oldshurst442 said:

I have my own stories about FCA...

It starts like this

 

In the year 2021...it is Judgement Day for FCA...blah blah blah...bankrupt....blah blah blah...Jeep sold to the highest bidder....blah blah blah...its a bloody shame...many storied names gone because of one carpet bagging, snake oil salesman buffoon...

 

Seems to be a common narrative around here...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They didn't do electric vehicles before for the same reason they haven't updated the 300 and Charger or brought out a capable mid size sedan, they have no money.  

Maserati sells no cars now making them electric will not get them anything.  Why don't they do an electric Jeep Wrangler, something that people buy and could benefit from low end torque.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Damn...saw a Hellcat Charger and a sweet C class Benz...both awesome cars...and all you guys can do is beat each other up over sales figures?

You sound like a couple of geriatric bankers who drive clapped out W body Impalas for fun...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, smk4565 said:

They didn't do electric vehicles before for the same reason they haven't updated the 300 and Charger or brought out a capable mid size sedan, they have no money.  

Maserati sells no cars now making them electric will not get them anything.  Why don't they do an electric Jeep Wrangler, something that people buy and could benefit from low end torque.

Probably because the return on investment would not be there. Most Wrangler buyers are very traditional in what they want.

4 hours ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

I wouldn't say they were common, but I saw Masers fairly frequently around the Phoenix area, esp. in Scottsdale. Usually QPs or GTs...

I see them more often in Columbus than vintage American Iron.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think there are a lot of young people that buy Wranglers though, and you'll have more success selling EV's to millennial than "old school" buyers that want a full size sedan with a V8.  I could see electric Renegade, Compass, Wrangler type vehicles doing well.  Small to mid-size SUVs.  They will sell a crap ton more of those than EV Quattroporte's and Ghibli's, no one buys those cars now.  Not sure why Maserati is still around, other than Sergio loves them since they have a Ferrari derived V6, but they don't even own Ferrari anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally I don't care about sales figures at the luxury level- building 3 million 'luxury' vehicles (including cargo vans & cheap FWD appliances & soon: rebadged 3rd tier pick-ups) is the antithesis of exclusivity, a cornerstone of luxury. I talk numbers because that's one of the few ways one can communicate with smk, and they help point out some of his lunacy. [Watch this:]

Small to mid-size [EV] SUVs.

Yeah! That's a great idea! Something like the Kia Soul- that's very successful; YtD sales are 53K! If only they offered an EV variant— wait... THEY DO! Wow- so cool, bet it sells in HUGE numbers! [looks it up...] oh. nevermind. YtD sales: 836.

Maybe it's simply that people who prefer EV-powered vehicles have no stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, balthazar said:

Personally I don't care about sales figures at the luxury level- building 3 million 'luxury' vehicles (including cargo vans & cheap FWD appliances & soon: rebadged 3rd tier pick-ups) is the antithesis of exclusivity, a cornerstone of luxury. I talk numbers because that's one of the few ways one can communicate with smk, and they help point out some of his lunacy. [Watch this:]

 

 

Yeah! That's a great idea! Something like the Kia Soul- that's very successful; YtD sales are 53K! If only they offered an EV variant— wait... THEY DO! Wow- so cool, bet it sells in HUGE numbers! [looks it up...] oh. nevermind. YtD sales: 836.

Maybe it's simply that people who prefer EV-powered vehicles have no stuff.

So you think an Electric Jeep is a bad idea but love the Bolt and I assume think the Buick SUV  Bolt will be a hit?   

The first brand FCA should look at for EV's is Jeep.  Jeep is their best brand image name plate and their most profitable.  It is also global and has volume.  Spending a couple billion to make EV Maseratis with no sales is asinine. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, smk4565 said:

Charger sells like 50% fleet.  

There are 54,000 taxis in Germany and 60% of them are Mercedes. That's 32,000 MB taxis. I don't know what sort of fleet percentage that works out to, but it certainly doesn't sound admirable.

- - - - -

Saw another interesting stat- German EV market share in 2016 was one-tenth of one percent. German is WAY behind the US in EV penetration!

8 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

So you think an Electric Jeep is a bad idea but love the Bolt and I assume think the Buick SUV  Bolt will be a hit?   

The first brand FCA should look at for EV's is Jeep.  Jeep is their best brand image name plate and their most profitable.  It is also global and has volume.  Spending a couple billion to make EV Maseratis with no sales is asinine. 

I've consistently stated that EV sales potential are being TREMENDOUSLY overrated, no matter what the vehicle is, and that it will take decades to achieve meaningful market penetration. Jeep, Maserati, Buick or Mercedes, it doesn't matter. Tesla sold 46K last year, that's a record, but it's still only a drop in the bucket. EV sales will rise, I've acknowledged that, but it will take YEARS. That's my take in a nutshell.

Most people seem to think EVs will be at 50% of vehicles sold in like 5 years.

I actually agree with you RE Maserati- that type/brand of car is supposed to be about a visceral, growling V8, not a faint electric hum & a whiff of sulfur. Going all EV not only would likely KILL sales via acceptance in the market, but via acceptance to Maserati's customer base. It's suicidal.

Jeep has the room for a few EV models, but I hope they don't make a stupid announcement "we're going all EV in 5 years!". Every marketer working for an OEM seems to have some sort of brain fever.

Edited by balthazar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, balthazar said:

Personally I don't care about sales figures at the luxury level- building 3 million 'luxury' vehicles (including cargo vans & cheap FWD appliances & soon: rebadged 3rd tier pick-ups) is the antithesis of exclusivity, a cornerstone of luxury. I talk numbers because that's one of the few ways one can communicate with smk, and they help point out some of his lunacy. [Watch this:]

 

 

Yeah! That's a great idea! Something like the Kia Soul- that's very successful; YtD sales are 53K! If only they offered an EV variant— wait... THEY DO! Wow- so cool, bet it sells in HUGE numbers! [looks it up...] oh. nevermind. YtD sales: 836.

Maybe it's simply that people who prefer EV-powered vehicles have no stuff.

Or maybe rodents are just into internal combustion!

6 hours ago, balthazar said:

Those dozen folk who know about Maserati must all be in NJ, I've seen 5 Masers in the last 3 weeks.

I saw five in one day last Saturday here in Columbus!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, A Horse With No Name said:

Or maybe rodents are just into internal combustion!

I saw five in one day last Saturday here in Columbus!

;) Most Rodents do not know they stink and need to clean up their act much like FCA. :P 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, dfelt said:

;) Most Rodents do not know they stink and need to clean up their act much like FCA. :P 

Rodents at least ahve the potential to evolve into a higher life form given a few million years...FCA is pretty much irreparable.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

While it is true that you might find a Maserati in North Jersey or Beverly Hills/Bel Air, an all-electric Maserati is rather pathetic (unless it is one model!).  Now, if FCA were smart, they would build one all electric model for each of their brands, starting with Chrysler/Dodge.  As for Jeep, perhaps a Grand Cherokee EV might work.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, FAPTurbo said:

this pretty much says fca isn't serious on electrics - say they'll do it and then give it to a pretty unknown brand so once it gets cancelled, everyone will have forgotten and shrug. 

but then fca isn't a serious car company anyways. 

Quoted for truth!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, balthazar said:

I dunno- Maser sold a record 36,500 units in 2014, which was a 600% increase over 2 years earlier. I think it's 'known'.

Thanks...did not know their sales were anywhere near that high...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, riviera74 said:

Sorry.  How MANY Maseratis are selling now (2017)?

Sorry...I was being sarcastic... actually my source says roughly 12000 for 2014 and slightly more now.

Did not make sense for them to sell 36000 in my mind.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search