Jump to content
Create New...

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
On 4/25/2017 at 2:10 PM, A Horse With No Name said:

Not really sure I agree with this...I could see them getting really good chassis feel with a V6....it isn't all about weight....

I am thinking about weight distribution.  the 2.0 malibu feels front heavy and unbalanced even though the front to rear is pretty close inbetween the 1.5 and 2.0.  a heavier v6 may make it even more lopsided, regardless of how well they can tune it out.

 

 

 

 

Edited by regfootball
Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, A Horse With No Name said:

I wonder if ti would pass modern emissions standards.  They ran forever....

wasn't it at least rated SULEV .. well, maybe not the S/C one, but the N/A was...
if it did have to be updated, raise the CR to ~10+, add DI and keep it with low end grunt.

 

Edited by loki
another idea

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search