Jump to content
Create New...

Recommended Posts

Posted

I know we've had a LaCrosse eAssist reviewed before but does anyone have experience with an eAssist Regal? Sounds whack but there are some 2014's on the used market here for about 18,5 and about 15k miles on them. Wonder about real mpg and if any reliability issues. Might be an option for a daily driver for me that I did not consider before. Otherwise thinking about Passat 1.8, Malibu, fusion etc as well as some smaller cars. Regal would be a huge upgrade.

Posted

They're quiet. No more hustle then a standard 2.4 liter once you get rolling, but you can feel a little more kick in the 0-25mph range. The electric boost gives them that low end torque feel of a turbo or grunty V6... but it goes away as the rpms increase.

 

forget about trunk space. 

Posted (edited)

There is a glut of used 14's on the market for cheap. Was it possible there were some fleet only regals without turbo OR eAssist?

For the pricing I could live with less go juice for 30mpg everyday. That would be a luxurious 'econocar' alternative at that price. Cobalt only gets 27-28 in winter anyways.

Edited by regfootball
Posted

About a month ago, Blue Knob had half a dozen 14 Regals with the 2.0T for right around S20k. One of them was even $18.9k, I believe. Seemed like a great deal, though Blue Knob mostly deals with ex-rentals and such. 

Posted

About a month ago, Blue Knob had half a dozen 14 Regals with the 2.0T for right around S20k. One of them was even $18.9k, I believe. Seemed like a great deal, though Blue Knob mostly deals with ex-rentals and such. 

 

Any AWDs?

Posted

 

About a month ago, Blue Knob had half a dozen 14 Regals with the 2.0T for right around S20k. One of them was even $18.9k, I believe. Seemed like a great deal, though Blue Knob mostly deals with ex-rentals and such. 

 

Any AWDs?

 

 

I think they were all FWD. Doing a quick search on Cars.com, I'm seeing a few in the same price range. I did notice that all the 2.0T are noted as "Turbo/e-assist", though. I thought it was the other way around...?

 

Edit: Looking around at Buick's website, with the e-assist as an option, Cars.com must just lump the option with that trim level because those are definitely the 2.0T and not e-assist. 

 

2014 Buick Regal $19,461 Cars.com

2014 Buick Regal $19,588 Cars.com

2014 Buick Regal $19,990 Cars.com

Posted

 

 

About a month ago, Blue Knob had half a dozen 14 Regals with the 2.0T for right around S20k. One of them was even $18.9k, I believe. Seemed like a great deal, though Blue Knob mostly deals with ex-rentals and such. 

 

Any AWDs?

 

 

I think they were all FWD. Doing a quick search on Cars.com, I'm seeing a few in the same price range. I did notice that all the 2.0T are noted as "Turbo/e-assist", though. I thought it was the other way around...?

 

Edit: Looking around at Buick's website, with the e-assist as an option, Cars.com must just lump the option with that trim level because those are definitely the 2.0T and not e-assist. 

 

2014 Buick Regal $19,461 Cars.com

2014 Buick Regal $19,588 Cars.com

2014 Buick Regal $19,990 Cars.com

 

 

 

Yeah, I'm wondering if that's what Reg was seeing.  The eAssist Regals are exceedingly rare. You almost have to factory order one if you want one. 

Posted

I have seen 2011 Regals for around $13,000 before, but those would be the base 2.4.  I just looked on auto trader and there are 2012 certified regals with low miles for $16-17k.   Most GM sedans have poor resale value, especially ones like the Malibu, Regal and Impala that have higher fleet rates.  A CXL or premium trim Regal for mid teens is a pretty good deal.  Lincoln MKZ's are great used car deals too, they lose like 50% of their value in 3 years.

Posted

Lincoln MKZ's are great used car deals too, they lose like 50% of their value in 3 years.

 

Sounds like an S-Class.  They lose an entire E-class in depreciation after 3 years. ($55k)

Posted

Good deals for people who do not mind used. only positive I can find on those auto's including the over priced over rated S Class.

Posted

The day I was looking last week, they had one AWD turbo that was listed as an early least return for 21k and 14k miles. Next day it was gone.

My guess is the Buick dealers wouldn't sell or couldn't sell the eAssist models so Buick ate it, fleeted them and is talking a loss and giving dealers a chance to sell them used. Not sure how Buick and gm can take one year old cars like that and watch them lose 40%....in the old days it was expected but the regal is a better car than that. Me and my dad are speculating when the bottom will fall out of Cruze diesel pricing.

Posted

current debate in my head is 'do you give up all wheel drive'?  Chrysler van. vs. Traverse and Explorer.  The extra cost of AWD vehicle and less space in the SUV's are making a tough decision.  And after the debacle replacing 4 tires due to one blowout in the T-rex with AWD, makes me wonder just how much more expense and hassle is worth it.  From a market perspective, the Regal gaining the AWD option is an Ace in the hole.  Buick = AWD is a nice differentiator from Chevy.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

it became apparent to me that looking into some of this glut of 2014's.....

 

I thought on the retail side, the regular 2.4 without eAssist was not available in 2014.

 

However, it seems like maybe some of these vehicles may have been fleet cars or something and they are non turbo and non eAssist.  I have an email in to one of the dealers that is listing the 2.4 to ask if it has eAssist.

 

My understanding is the eAssist cars have different wheels, and from what i see, almost none of these cars I am looking at have the eAssist wheels but do apparently have the 2.4 and strangely enough they don't have epa MPG ratings listed.

 

Did Buick build a bunch of Regals for fleet with just the 2.4?


 

 

 

About a month ago, Blue Knob had half a dozen 14 Regals with the 2.0T for right around S20k. One of them was even $18.9k, I believe. Seemed like a great deal, though Blue Knob mostly deals with ex-rentals and such. 

 

Any AWDs?

 

 

I think they were all FWD. Doing a quick search on Cars.com, I'm seeing a few in the same price range. I did notice that all the 2.0T are noted as "Turbo/e-assist", though. I thought it was the other way around...?

 

Edit: Looking around at Buick's website, with the e-assist as an option, Cars.com must just lump the option with that trim level because those are definitely the 2.0T and not e-assist. 

 

2014 Buick Regal $19,461 Cars.com

2014 Buick Regal $19,588 Cars.com

2014 Buick Regal $19,990 Cars.com

 

 

 

Yeah, I'm wondering if that's what Reg was seeing.  The eAssist Regals are exceedingly rare. You almost have to factory order one if you want one. 

 

this is starting to add up and make sense now.

Posted

confirmed......

 

2.4, WITHOUT E-assist........curiously interesting.   I don't think they retailed the 2.4 cars, these have to be fleet.

 

Most likely.... Rental service only.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/bymodel/2014_Buick_Regal.shtml

 

the epa ratings of the 2.4 never were that good.  Not even better than the turbo really.  Odd that the Equinox with the same motor would have better epa mpg.

 

Gearing.

In the Regal it is geared to feel peppy.

In the Equinox it is geared to not feel slower than a CR-V

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search