Jump to content
Create New...

Recommended Posts

Posted

Walking to work this a.m., I came across a late-model Cavalier sedan with nice-looking, apparently factory wheels and a badge on the front fender. Bending closer, I saw the badge declared "Z24". Did they make a sedan version of the Z24?

Sure, I could google this, but I'd rather consult with y'all first. :)

  • Agree 1
Posted

Cool! Wouldn't mind having one of those myself.

I enjoy "off the beaten path" models like a 4-door Z24. :)

Posted

We had one of these at work that was a GM pilot car they gave us. John Lingenfelter put a Tubo on it. Nice little car we used at company displays.

I would not waste my time on the Z24 sedan. I would move to the Cobalt SS Turbo Sedan. Not only are they fast and have great handling but they are also very rare. I think less than 500 were made each of the two years on the market. With the GM Turbo upgrade they were around 285 HP.

Posted

Here's the one that's on my way to work:

IMAG0865.jpg

Yeah, a Cobalt SS would be great as well. So would a Dodge SRT-4!

Posted

They were a one year option I believe, until GM replaced the Z24 trim with LS Sport. A 02 Z24 could be an interesting find. They used the same 2.2L Ecotec (less a few enhancements) as the one in the Cobalt.

Posted

Up until '02 Z24s had the twin cam 2.4. For '02 they got the Ecotec.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Mine wasn't a sedan, but I had a 2001 Z24 with the Twin Cam and a 5 speed and it was a really fun car to drive. The Z24 sedans seem to be pretty rare. Mine had the 5 spoke wheels like the ones in NeonLX's pic. The one in ocnblu's pic has the later wheels that the LS Sport had, also.

Now I have a Cobalt SS Turbocharged sedan, which I guess would be the successor to these Z24 sedans.

Posted

Go back farther and they had 2.8 and 3.1 V6 engines.

i'm betting the 3.1 made them quite fun, but also nose heavy. but not like we don't expect that anyway. lol

Posted

Go back farther and they had 2.8 and 3.1 V6 engines.

i'm betting the 3.1 made them quite fun, but also nose heavy. but not like we don't expect that anyway. lol

The weight was not that bad. They were not a bad car for then but looking back now the lack of power really stands out. We used to think the cars in the 80's were really something but 2.8 and 3.1 V6 did not even have 150 HP. You have to remember too that the Camaro V8 did not even have 200 HP.

Posted

I'm a little confused about one thing... everywhere I see information about the J-bodies, it says that the engines were updated in '02. However, I'm 99% sure that my '01 Sunfire had the 2.2 Ecotec.

Can someone confirm or deny that possibility?

Posted

I'm a little confused about one thing... everywhere I see information about the J-bodies, it says that the engines were updated in '02. However, I'm 99% sure that my '01 Sunfire had the 2.2 Ecotec.

Can someone confirm or deny that possibility?

What I find is you are correct.

Year: 2001 Make: Pontiac Model: Sunfire Sub Models: Base Engine Sizes: 2.2L L4 GAS, 2.4L L4 GAS Item: Engine Assembly

OEM Genuine Quality

Posted

dfelt - I don't think that really tells us anything, as the 2.2 Ecotec replaced the earlier "2200 OHV" engine - both were the same size.

From wiki:

  • 1998–2002 – 2.2 L (134 cu in) 2200 (RPO: LN2) I4, 115 hp (86 kW) and 135 lb·ft (183 N·m)
  • 2002–2005 – 2.2 L (134 cu in) Ecotec (RPO: L61) I4, 140 hp (104 kW) and 150 lb·ft (203 N·m)

However, I'm 99% sure that my '01 had the 140 hp engine, not the 115 hp engine.

Posted

GM switched to the Ecotec (calling these LS Sports) 2.2 midway through the 2002 model year. The Z24 sedan was only produced for about half of the 2002 year.....helped to finish what was left of the 2.4s. No ecotecs in the Sunfire in 2001...just the old 2.2 and 2.4 (for the GT).

From 2003 on, J's all had the 2.2 Ecotec......

  • 4 months later...
Posted

if fuel economy is what you want the 2.2 ecotec is better than the 2,4 and more reliable i own a 2001 z24 cav in canada sure its a fun little car with 150hp but rides hard to stiff suspention but hey im 51yrs old and bought mine of an older guy also

Posted

if fuel economy is what you want the 2.2 ecotec is better than the 2,4 and more reliable i own a 2001 z24 cav in canada sure its a fun little car with 150hp but rides hard to stiff suspention but hey im 51yrs old and bought mine of an older guy also

Nah, they are pretty much the same....

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search