Jump to content
Create New...

Cheers or Jeers: 8,000 Mile 1977 Cadillac Eldorado  

4 members have voted

  1. 1. Cheers or Jeers?

    • Cheers! Lesser car tremble at the sound of 425 cubic inches!
      4
    • Jeers! It's so big he couldn't fit the whole thing into one picture!
      0


Recommended Posts

Posted

Cheers or Jeers: 8,000 Mile 1977 Cadillac Eldorado


Link:1977 Cadillac Eldorado1?ff3=2&pub=5574850503&toolid=10001&camp






You'll be hard pressed to find a 1977 Cadillac Eldorado with less miles than this Beauty. Only 8421 original miles. Very desirable Black on Black survivor. This car has always been stored in a heated garage and has never been driven in winter. Absolutely rust free along with having all original paint.  Only thing not original are the tires. The originals where replaced due to cracking. It still has the original untouched spare in the trunk. The interior is finished in Houndstooth Black and White and is in near perfect condition. It's powered by a 425 cubic inch V8 that runs like the day it was driven off the assembly line. This car truly is as ORIGINAL as you'll find for a 35 year old classic Caddie.                        


Posted Image
Posted

I'm with Oldsmoboi...The 425 had its work cut out for it trying to yank around all that lard. My granny had a '77 Coupe deVille with the 425...seemed to hustle along pretty well but I think it weighed significantly less than the Eldo.

Posted

^ Yep, around 750 lbs less.

Still, there was NOT a great deal of power difference in the 500 by '76, and the 425 in '78.

The last 500 had 190 HP, the 425 had 180. With FI, it was 215 / 195.

Most of the issue was the weight : '78 E ~ 4906 lbs.

To 'fix' the 'problem', you'd want the 400 HP / 550 TRQ 500 from '70 in there.

Posted

^ Yep.

Cadillac did issue dual ratings in '72. 400/550 was on 10.5:1 CR, it dropped to 8.5:1 in '72.

There the ratings there were HP : 365 / 235, so you can guesstimate the net on the '70.

Posted (edited)

nonono- that's 365 HP gross, 235 HP net.

I don't have dual TRQ numbers handy, but rest assured the TRQ was well above the HP.

Shouldn't have typed it out that way.

RECAP~

1970 : 400 HP / 550 TRQ (10:5.1, gross)

1971 : 365 HP / 535 TRQ (8:5.1, gross)

1972 : 235 HP / 385 TRQ (8:5.1, net)

Edited by balthazar

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search