Jump to content
Create New...

  

5 members have voted

  1. 1. Yes or no?

    • Yup, when do we raid it?
      3
    • Nah, looks like a scrap metal run to me.
      2


Recommended Posts

Posted

Found on Craigslist

For sale a pair of 61 Pontiac Ventura's 1 was an original 425A car with drag Racing history from new in Florida. The other is a complete running 389 auto. The 425 A car has PHS , 8 Lugs, HP manifolds, 3:64 posi, still on it but it is good for parts to build the other car. Worth well more than the asking price in parts alone.

Also selling off a 1963 Grand Prix 1 owner from California complete with A/C and 8 lugs for $2400.00

http://philadelphia....3036308980.html

5N25G15H23Ec3M53J2c5o29034fae70db1969.jpg

5If5N95Y63Ef3K83Jbc5o7ff3a6fb7b64109b.jpg

5L65Ib5M63Kc3m53Hcc5o8fe8db95a3b01eeb.jpg

5N25K25J23Gf3M53H2c5oca7d5e15ed2f115a.jpg

Posted

Head is the same for all non-SD '61-62 Pontiacs; 538177, but yep, that's a 425A manifold.

425A cars were either 333 HP (4bbl) or 348 HP (3x2bbl) 389s, very strong performers, and not common.

Silver Ventura looks to be decent, curious (via the photos) that the seller claims the red car is the builder.

Complete powertrain in the 425A car plus the 2nd car is well worth the $4K, IMO.

Posted

I'm forever scared of a convertible parked with no top. They get enough water damage even WITH a top. Although the silver car lacks a back glass...

Posted

Head is the same for all non-SD '61-62 Pontiacs; 538177, but yep, that's a 425A manifold.

425A cars were either 333 HP (4bbl) or 348 HP (3x2bbl) 389s, very strong performers, and not common.

Silver Ventura looks to be decent, curious (via the photos) that the seller claims the red car is the builder.

Complete powertrain in the 425A car plus the 2nd car is well worth the $4K, IMO.

I was hoping you'd shed some light here, seemed to me that there was value in this deal - glad you could confirm my guess.

And I agree, the silver car looks far more viable.

Posted

I'm forever scared of a convertible parked with no top. They get enough water damage even WITH a top. Although the silver car lacks a back glass...

Red one looks to be a coupe also, w/ a back window rolled down (roof obscured by the tree).

Posted

Srsly? *checking*

Well, nothing in the ad said it was a convertible, and that looks like a coupe A-pillar to me (convertibles had all chrome trim on the A-pillar).

Posted

There's so much light on the interior though. I cannot really tell. Will need to google to check A-pillar trim.

Posted

There's so much light on the interior though. I cannot really tell. Will need to google to check A-pillar trim.

convertible:

1961_Pontiac_Bonneville_Convertible_1.JPG

coupe:

1960-1961-pontiac-ventura-1961-3.jpg

Posted

Yup, I see that, I was over at one of the "old car brochure" sites, noted the full stainless windshield post trim on ragtops, and no mention of a Ventura convertible, only Bonneville.

I guess with a breezy bubbletop, there's gonna be a lof ot light coming in. Just looks weird in the photo to me.

Posted

Maybe he should have pruned the jungle away - I thought the red car was roofless too.

'Nother detail - it appears that the backlight for the silver car is sitting on its trunklid.

Posted (edited)

I swear that roof is cut away from the red car. Look how the branches go behind the windshield there. The front window is up, you can see the sash and the tint line where it meets the branches at the top, but the branches overhang the top of the glass and are visible inside it. Am I dreaming? Is this a homemade convertible? Need moar photos.

Edited by ocnblu
Posted

I swear that roof is cut away from the red car. Look how the branches go behind the windshield there. The front window is up, you can see the sash and the tint line where it meets the branches at the top, but the branches overhang the top of the glass and are visible inside it. Am I dreaming? Is this a homemade convertible? Need moar photos.

Not sure..I see the reflection of the branches and leaves on the top center of the windshield...and there is either or a branch or a C-pillar visible (slanting straight line where hte C-pillar should be). I think the roof is either rusted or painted black..don't see any red where the top of the roof would be.

Posted

It's really hard to tell if it has a roof or not, but I don't think it is a convertible.

There is a rusty rear package shelf visible that I don't think a vert would have.

Posted

Leaves inside the side glass could just be trapped from opening/closing the door.

I believe I see the C-pillar kick-up of a hardtop, the converts didn't have that. The rest of the clues posted here aren't definite enough for me.

If it WERE a convert, I could see what appears to be the worse project being implied as the builder, but anyone who knows what a 425A car is should know that car has more potential.

Really not sure which it is, and again amazed in 2012 that pics this poor can still be taken.

Posted

Which is probably why the cars are still listed rather than sold.

Some folks just don't know how to get the job done.

Which can be to our advantage as enthusiasts...

The psychology of craigslist ads can be fascinating.

Posted

I've seen this ad before, as "'61 and '62 Pontiac" is a term I search often. Would love to own a restored '61 like the one Cubical posted above :lovey:

I agree!

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search