Jump to content
Create New...

Cheers or Jeers: 50,000 Mile 1960 Mercedes-Benz 190 Diesel  

5 members have voted

  1. 1. Cheers or Jeers?

    • Cheers! Luxury an economy in a manageable size!
      3
    • Jeers! Why is that oil gauge pegged?
      2


Recommended Posts

Posted

Cheers or Jeers: 50,000 Mile 1960 Mercedes-Benz 190 Diesel

$(KGrHqJ,!iIE9,Y6JEY(BPqu83MK+w~~_3.JPG

$(KGrHqJHJCIE-pUw2Uf8BPqu9CBzLg~~_3.JPG

$(KGrHqJ,!oIE9c50WVMDBPqvEJ(QRQ~~_3.JPG

$(KGrHqZHJ!4E-c,ubw(HBPqvNjh50!~~_3.JPG

*********************************************************************************************

Just for giggles, here's a 1960 Cadillac interior:

InteriorFront.jpg

Posted

WMJ, personal thanks for that last pic.

• • •

Uhh, not much here to like IMO - spartan, dated, grotesquely underpowered, no amenities, it's a sedan but only fits 4..... might as well get a '60 American; same car.

Posted (edited)

Looks like it's in good condition, hard to tell with the brown in the photos though, it could be hiding some sins.

Was this the top Mercedes sedan in 1960 in Germany?

Looking at the comparitive photos, dude we DID win WWII. Europe is still different in some ways because of both World Wars being fought on their soil. Conservation of resources is simply a fact of life over there, I guess.

EDIT: after looking at the gallery, this thing is looking CLEAN. The lower body appears smooth in the photos, I'm betting it's all metal, no bondo. The MB-Tex is flawless, I'm sure the seats have been recovered though.

Nice little buggy.

Edited by ocnblu
Posted (edited)

the

Looks like it's in good condition, hard to tell with the brown in the photos though, it could be hiding some sins.

Was this the top Mercedes sedan in 1960 in Germany?

Nice little buggy.

Nah, the 180/190 was kind of like a C-Class. The 300 was the Big Dog..

Mercedes-Benz_300_Sedan_1959.jpg

Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
Posted

^ is that a circa '60?? Looks like a circa '42 from this side of the pond.

Wonder what their fortunes would look like if mercedees had continued thru to today being 15-20 years behind the market, and was marketing 1990 material today? :P

Posted

^ is that a circa '60?? Looks like a circa '42 from this side of the pond.

It was starting to look a bit old by '60...the basic design lasted from '51-62.

Posted

There was/is a special German love for the 300 design. It was the Adenauer Benz.... basically Germany's "Limo 1" for the first post war Chancellor Konrad Adenauer, who was extremely popular with the German people at the time.... and a symbol that Germany would rebuild.

Posted

It's not at all unpleasant, just soooo dated.

^ is that a circa '60?? Looks like a circa '42 from this side of the pond.

It was starting to look a bit old by '60...the basic design lasted from '51-62.

Being basically 20 years behind is far from "a bit behind"...

Posted

Cheers to that. It may be a base model car, but it is 52 years old and in excellent condition, and not very expensive. And it is Mercedes diesel so it will run forever and it is still covered under Mercedes roadside assistance in case you break down.

Posted

Nicer interior, better trimmed :

Questionable. The Rambler was quite outdated at the time (the Rambler American was an update of an early '50s design).

Posted

Disagree; much more cohesive design, better hardware.

Look for example how the holes the 190's horn ring is attached thru are so openly exposed.

Mostly to the point- how similar it is to the 190.

Posted (edited)

I agree with balthy in that they are somewhat similar (Rambler and 190), but I think compared to American cars of the time, Benz was only 5-10 years behind in body design. The M-B 300 pictured, if that happens to be a 1960 model, compares to something American from about 1952-1954, when you think of fender integration and greenhouse evolution, at least in my recollection.

I can't think of a decade that had more rapid evolution of car body design than 1950-1960.

Edited by ocnblu
Posted

^ I would agree; stylistically, the 190 is circa 53-54 (everything mainstream had integrated rear fenders by '55), but the 300 stylistically is much older.

It still has vestigial running boards, something Cadillac started to minimize in '38 and eliminated entirely by '48. Mercedes was still clinging to them in 60.

Here's a '42 Buick; note the similar fender integration, more cohesive body hardware, the break away to the integrated horizontal grille, smooth surface transitions. Much older, yet still ahead of the 300. Mercedes 300 is somewhere around '42-46 by design cues.

1942-Super-convertible.jpg

Posted

Weren't running boards just tucked behind the doors though on some cars? I see what you mean about the protruding rocker panel area on the 300, but there is no rubber step there visible from outside. Vestigial indeed.

M-B did take a conservative, Old World approach to stylistic progress as defined by Americans Postwar.

Mercedes was interested in keeping their grille design largely intact carried through from the old days, which lends an air of timelessness and permanance, but also a bit of difficulty, perhaps, in keeping up with trends.

One minor but telling note: LOVE the nameplate font on the 190, they used that same font for decades, another sign of resistance to trends.

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search