Jump to content
Create New...

Cheers or Jeers: 17,000 Mile Cadillac Coupe DeVille Diesel  

5 members have voted

  1. 1. Cheers or Jeers?

    • Cheers! Cadillac style and diesel efficiency!
      5
    • Jeers! Bad engine in poorly styled car.
      0


Recommended Posts

Posted

Cheers or Jeers: 17,000 Mile Cadillac Coupe DeVille Diesel

1979 Cadillac COUPE DEVILLE DIESEL

THIS IS THE NICEST 1979 CADILLAC COUPE DEVILLE IN THE COUNTRY 17,062 ORIGINAL MILES V8 DIESEL ENGINE ALL ORIGINAL PERFECT CONDITION LOW MILEAGE FACTORY DIESEL ENGINE RUST FREE NON-SMOKER

  • ALL ORIGINAL
  • PERFECT CONDITION
  • 17,062 ORIGINAL MILES
  • 5.7L V8 DIESEL ENGINE
  • RUST FREE
  • LEATHER INTERIOR SEATS
  • WOOD TRIM INTERIOR
  • LEATHER STEERING WHEEL
  • POWER SEATS
  • POWER LOCKS
  • POWER TRUNK/HOOD
  • CLIMATE CONTROL
  • AM/FM RADIO
  • OUTSIDE TEMPERTURE GAUGE
  • INTERIOR/EXTERIOR LIGHTS
  • HALOGEN HEADLIGHTS
  • 15" WHEELS

We offer free airport pick-up. We can help facilitate low-cost shipping directly to your door.

mg_800.jpg

VQ_800.jpg

6Q_800.jpg

1w_800.jpg

Posted

I think it's a good looking CDV. Just think how history would have changed if GM had engineered the Olds diesel to a standard similar to contemporary Benz diesels, which ran for half a million miles if maintained...

Posted

Caddy looks fab; the diesel engine ruined it. A REAL diesel engine (rather than the pseudo-diesels that went into Olds and Caddies at the time) would make them a classic. When I lived in NJ, I heard stories of people swapping out the Olds/Caddy diesels for a Caddy V8 engine and it worked out great for them.

  • Agree 1
Posted

By 1984 they were fine. They had a water separator and stronger head bolts.

According to Wiki, no Olds Diesel ever had an OEM fuel/water separator.

That said, my father fixed diesels early on in his mechanical career... and him and his diesel cohorts felt the 1981 DX block improvements were enough to make for a suitable diesel... problem is, that even after 1981, the people buying them maintained them wrong, leading to more catastrophic failure. I would trust all 1981-1985 diesels about the same.

I believe dad installed a separator on our car.

Posted

that doesn't sound right... and even more suspicious is that the phrase in wikipedia is repeated word for word for word on every search result. But as I'm 4,000 miles away from my reference materials right now, I can't say anything against it. I do believe that a water separator from GM started in 1984, but perhaps that was only on replacement engines. 1984 rings strong in my mind because it was by then that the engine was running properly and the next natural reaction from GM was to kill it after 1985.

Posted

Good buy if it didn't have the diesel engine. Since it has 17,000 miles already, the engine will probably blow soon. It is really nice car in good condition, but it has the wrong engine (unless you don't drive anywhere).

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search