Jump to content
Create New...

Cheers or Jeers: 24,000 Mile 1937 Oldsmobile F37


Cheers or Jeers: 24,000 Mile 1937 Oldsmobile F37  

8 members have voted

  1. 1. Cheers or Jeers?

    • Cheers! Cruze mileage in an more stylish package!
      8
    • Jeers! Looks like any generic 1930's car!
      0


Recommended Posts

Cheers or Jeers: 24,000 Mile 1937 Oldsmobile F37

1937 Oldsmobile! FOR SALE

Oldsmobile was one of America’s leading automobile producers in the early 20th century, at a time when Chevrolet and Ford were a bit farther behind. The first production automobile was introduced in 1897 by Ransom E. Olds, which makes Oldsmobile the second oldest nameplate in America, falling right behind Studebaker.

The Oldsmobile L37 was capable of achieving 40 miles to just one gallon of gas. This super popular model has been exported worldwide, and in some instances, customers received custom bodies by famous coachbuilders. Maltby of Folkestone, England was the designer behind the sleek, elegant convertible sedan coachwork that made up the Oldsmobile L37. In this same year, Oldsmobile introduced the safety semi-automatic transmission as an option that cost $100.

28KGrHqFhsE8T5cqr28BPSt2728uQ60_3.jpg

28KGrHqRrcE88g9dqpTBPSt7C2Gg60_3.jpg

28KGrHqZrEE88gWoQIWBPSvu7r0g60_3.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Balthazar, I see lots of references to L37 of the same Oldsmobile that supposedly got 40 miles to the gallon.

In '50, the new OHV Olds 88 returned 20.19 MPG in the Mobilgas Economy run (average speed 41 MPH). And there the cars were 'blueprinted' for max mileage for bragging/advertising rites.

Prior to Mobilgas, the economy runs were called 'Gilmore-Yosemite'. Here's a link to the 1936 winners by class, with all their MPGs.

Olds 6 was 23, Olds 8 was 19. Only car over 30 was the Willys 4.

40 out of a full-sized Olds in this era is fantasy.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree 40 mpg is fantasy, but I suppose GM did some testing that gave them some weak footing to brag 40 mpg.

The economy runs sound like they were on mountainous roads and have a lot of fuel wasting acceleration/deceleration... sure, they probably resulted in accurate numbers, but not numbers that marking wants to hear.

Considering they had the semi-automatic 4 speed tranny in '37, I'm sure that it helped mileage in some sort of rigged test that GM got 40 mpg on (or 39.5 mpg rounded up).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a bunch of Olds' print ads from the '38-39 era - no mention of MPG claims.

1 ad mentions a 'Econo-Master' engine but gives no numeric claim.

I didn't read the specifics RE the Gilmore-Yosemite test, but I can tell you the Mobilgas runs squeezed the best MPG out of the cars in it, ever.

I guarantee you the '40 MPG' thing did NOT originate @ GM... ESP with the actual being so far from 40.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a bunch of Olds' print ads from the '38-39 era - no mention of MPG claims.

1 ad mentions a 'Econo-Master' engine but gives no numeric claim.

I didn't read the specifics RE the Gilmore-Yosemite test, but I can tell you the Mobilgas runs squeezed the best MPG out of the cars in it, ever.

I guarantee you the '40 MPG' thing did NOT originate @ GM... ESP with the actual being so far from 40.

Very cool, Thank you Balthazar for the info. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search