Jump to content
Create New...

Recommended Posts

Posted

66 House Members A Send Letter To Stop EPA & California

William Maley - Editor/Reporter - CheersandGears.com

October 21, 2011

post-10485-0-11328700-1319212703.png

66 House of Representative members have sent a letter to House Appropriations Committee Chairman Harold Rogers, R-Ky., urging the house to include a provision prohibiting the Environmental Protection Agency and California from moving forward with new fuel emissions limits.

"A one-year 'timeout' is necessary as EPA and (California) are setting national fuel economy standards without explicit authorization by Congress, under laws not designed to regulate fuel economy," said the letter signed by Reps. Mike Rogers, R-Brighton; Joe Barton, R-Texas; Tim Walberg, R-Tipton; Darrell Issa, R-Calif.; and others.

Back in July, the House Appropriations Committee approved an amendment in July that would bar EPA and California from implementing the new fuel economy mandate.

Their effort is being supported by the National Automobile Dealers Association, which has raised concerns about whether Americans will buy more fuel-efficient but more expensive vehicles.

On Thursday, a group of eight CEOs from U.S. environmental, science and public interest organizations urged the NADA to drop its efforts.

"These standards are supported by major automakers, the United Auto Workers, California and other clean car states, and numerous consumer, environmental, business and national security organizations. By continuing to oppose these standards, NADA is trying to sell Congress, dealers and the American people a lemon," said the letter from the CEOs of the Natural Resources Defense Council, the Sierra Club, Environment America, the Safe Climate Campaign, the Union of Concerned Scientists and others.

Source: The Detroit News

Posted

I think motorcycles should be legislated out of existence. They have no purpose. They're unsafe and they have very little pollution controls. And they get criminally poor fuel economy compared to bicycles.

  • Agree 1
  • Disagree 1
Posted

I think motorcycles should be legislated out of existence. They have no purpose. They're unsafe and they have very little pollution controls. And they get criminally poor fuel economy compared to bicycles.

Surely your being sarcastic, right?

I mean...I think we should have the freedom to drive and ride what we like.

Posted (edited)

Merely a return volley. And don't call me Shirley.;)

...and how are we going to drive what we like if these criminal standards are allowed to finally ruin our auto industry due to poor demand for the wimped-out result?

Edited by ocnblu
Posted
<br>
<br>

Uncle Sam will let you know what you &#39;want&#39; to drive...<br>

<br>

<br>

I guess we&#39;ll have to show him exactly where he can stick that.<br>

</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<p>Yes, I think we should. &nbsp;Otherwise, we&#39;ll have nothing to drive....</p>

Cort | 38.m.IL | pigValve + paceMaker | 5 Monte Carlos + 1 Caprice Classic

* PRE-SURGERY PARTY = ~5:30p-10:30p, Saturday, 10/29/2011 at Beef Villa, 1225 W Spring St, S Elgin IL *

"There's things goin' on make me mad down to the core" __ Charlie Daniels __ 'Simple Man'

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search