Jump to content
Create New...

Recommended Posts

Posted

First birdcage liners, now fuel.

Scientists at Tulane University have discovered a new use for discarded newspapers — one that can turn yesterday's news into the alternative fuel of tomorrow.

Their research has hit upon a bacterial strain that chomps away at the cellulose in old newsprint, turning the organic material into butanol, a bio-substitute for the gas tank.

The strain is the first bacterial microbe found in nature that produces butanol directly from cellulose, a material found in all green plants, university officials say.

A team led by Tulane molecular biology professor David Mullin discovered the microbe in animal dung at the New Orleans zoo and dubbed the strain TU-103, using the university's initials.

"In the United States alone, at least 323 million tons of cellulosic materials that could be used to produce butanol are thrown out each year," said Harshad Velankar, a postdoctoral fellow working with Mullin's group.

Turning it into butanol is the "dream of many," he said in a statement.

The researchers are using old editions of the hometown newspaper, the Times Picayune, to experiment with the strain. Unlike other butanol-producing microbes, this one can withstand the presence of oxygen.

A patent is pending on the strain, and it's unclear whether the technology has any market viability.

Other attempts at creating biofuel have failed to gain traction, even though the federal government and the auto industry have spent considerable money trying to broaden their presence in the market place.

Ethanol — a plant-based biofuel — was briefly popular several years ago as the gas alternative of choice. Cellulosic ethanol is made from renewable sources, such as corn sugar, agricultural waste and wood chips.

Some researchers have even gone as far as to experiment with turning algae into this fuel.

But as battery technology improved and more automakers turned to electric cars as a way to cut emissions, ethanol has fallen to the wayside. Some claim it damages engines, as well.

Butanol, however, is different from ethanol. It can readily fuel existing cars and trucks without any engine modification and has a higher energy density, making it more like unleaded gasoline.

The auto industry, however, isn't sold on it. Nor have efforts to promote a butanol-gas mixture caught on.

***********************************************************************

Posted

but this will create competition with recycling newspapers. more paper or energy, oh the choices?!!!!!

Posted

Interesting.... printed newspapers are a dwinding resource, though, as more and more people only consume news content online.

Posted

I wouldn't write-off cellulosic ethanol just yet, but this is a welcome option just the same.

The problem with ethanol is that engines have to get smaller and compressions higher just to equal the fuel economy of gasoline. That ethanol has lower specific energy than gasoline is true, but its combustion properties allow for a more efficient combustion process to extract a greater amount of that energy to bring the efficiency per gallon close to equal of gasoline.

If they could do cellulosic butanol, that would be the holy grail.

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search