Jump to content
Create New...

Chevrolet Sonic aims to be the top small car in safety


Drew Dowdell

Recommended Posts

Chevrolet Sonic aims to be the top small car in safety

post-51-0-83863800-1314651220.jpg

August 29th, 2011 - Drew Dowdell - CheersandGears.com

Small cars aren't typically known for their crash worthiness. For 2012, Chevrolet hopes to change that perception with their new Sonic. The main component of the safety design is its exceptionally strong body structure and safety cage. Welded tubular steel members are used to support the the door frame openings while additional steel bracing reinforces the doors. About 60% of the unit body structure is high strength steel while ultra-high-strength steel forms the forward rocker panels.

In the event of a frontal or frontal offset crash, the Sonic's engine cradle and engine compartment rails absorb and distribute the impact energy around the passenger compartment. The A and B pillars are additionally reinforced and the Sonic is capable of withstanding more than 4 times its own weight if overturned.

Keeping the passenger compartment intact in a crash is important but so is cushioning the impact on the passengers inside the car. For that the Sonic employes 10 airbags; Dual stage airbags for the front driver and passenger, Roof-rail mounted head curtain airbags that stay inflated longer, seat mounted side impact airbags and a segment exclusive driver knee airbag.

<iframe frameborder='0' scrolling='no' align='middle' SRC='http://mediasuite.multicastmedia.com/player.php?v=top3gg29' height='215' width='279' allowtransparency='true'></iframe>

<iframe frameborder='0' scrolling='no' align='middle' SRC='http://mediasuite.multicastmedia.com/player.php?v=zd0zja65' height='215' width='279' allowtransparency='true'></iframe>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fill it with packing peanuts.

Just make sure they are the new green eviromental peanuts. LOL!

Hey GM is going to do fine with this car. It is as good of better than the others on the markets based on the first reports. Also it is miles ahead of the Aveo.

GM here is just trying to show an American car buying public small cars can take some mega blows today. This is no different than the video of the Malibu and the 59 Impala in the off set crash last year.

GM has to move more and more smaller cars and they have to convince many that just because they are small they can still take a hard impact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh the Drama.........

The Sonic is expected to be no more than 2800 and no less than 2800 depending on body and engine trim both acceptable for this price of car.

It ain't a Lotus but then you are also not paying $50K for it and needs to get a 5 star crash rating no matter what.

I suspect we will see a Eco version of this one and 50 MPG may be in sight. GM is showing a trend with the Eco models and they are selling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh the Drama.........

The Sonic is expected to be no more than 2800 and no less than 2800 depending on body and engine trim both acceptable for this price of car.

It ain't a Lotus but then you are also not paying $50K for it and needs to get a 5 star crash rating no matter what.

I suspect we will see a Eco version of this one and 50 MPG may be in sight. GM is showing a trend with the Eco models and they are selling.

I doubt it... an 8% weight reduction and similar aerodynamic drag (yes, its a little smaller in profile, but also a draggy hatchback) does not translate into an increase in fuel economy from 42 to 50 mpg. if I have to put a number on it, I'll say 1~2 mpg improvement in the city number, maybe 0~1 mpg on the freeway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh the Drama.........

The Sonic is expected to be no more than 2800 and no less than 2800 depending on body and engine trim both acceptable for this price of car.

It ain't a Lotus but then you are also not paying $50K for it and needs to get a 5 star crash rating no matter what.

I suspect we will see a Eco version of this one and 50 MPG may be in sight. GM is showing a trend with the Eco models and they are selling.

I doubt it... an 8% weight reduction and similar aerodynamic drag (yes, its a little smaller in profile, but also a draggy hatchback) does not translate into an increase in fuel economy from 42 to 50 mpg. if I have to put a number on it, I'll say 1~2 mpg improvement in the city number, maybe 0~1 mpg on the freeway.

You will be suprised at what they can and will do in the future. Many of the numbers you play with leave out a lot of things.

That is not to say you are wrong but even the GM engineers still find things that suprise them in testing. The LNF was increased in performance and they found 1-2 MPG with a simple flash and more boost on a very high drag HHR. The GM Powertrain engineer confirmed it is real and said it was a suprise to them. They were only looking for power.

Note too they also have a sedan.

What ever the case many companies have and will offer higher mileage versions on many cars using many tricks. What was once impossible is not possible due to new technologies and electronics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is the hatch back model getting more attention than the sedan? Hard to find photos or info about the sedan?

The sedan needs little promotion as they expect it to sell well as is. The hatch is the one they feel that needs promoted since hatches have not sold as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search